Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Am J Surg ; 226(2): 163-169, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36966017

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, post-discharge virtual visits transitioned from a novel intervention to standard practice. Our aim was to evaluate participation in and outcomes of virtual post-discharge visits in the early-pandemic timeframe. METHODS: Pandemic cohort patients were compared to historical patients. Patient demographics, clinical information, and post-discharge 30-day hospital encounters were compared between groups. RESULTS: The historical cohort included 563 patients and the pandemic cohort had 823 patients. There was no difference in 30-day hospital encounters between patients who completed a video vs. telephone visit in the pandemic cohort (3.8% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.11). There was a lower 30-day hospital encounter rate in pandemic video and telephone visits compared to similar historical sub-groups. CONCLUSION: Expansion of virtual post-discharge visits to include all patients and telephone calls did not negatively impact rates of 30-day post-discharge hospital encounters. Offering telehealth options for post-discharge follow-up does not appear to have negative impact on healthcare utilization.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Humanos , Assistência ao Convalescente , Pandemias , Alta do Paciente , COVID-19/epidemiologia
4.
Clin Nephrol ; 97(3): 150-156, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34642017

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a multi-organ system disease, and rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) have varied significantly. Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence of AKI among hospitalized COVID-19-positive patients in a large hospital system in the Southeast of the USA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cohort study of admitted patients discharged between March 1, 2020 and April 30, 2020 at Atrium Health who had tested positive for COVID-19 by polymerase chain reaction testing of a nasopharyngeal swab. The positive test had been within 2 weeks prior to or after admission. AKI was defined and staged using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2012 AKI criteria. Patient-level data including demographic characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and other comorbidities were also obtained. RESULTS: Of the admitted patients with COVID-19, 74 of 254 (29.1%, 95% CI 23.6 - 35.1%) had AKI. Participants with AKI compared to those without AKI tended to be ≥ 65 years of age (57 vs. 39%; p = 0.01), male (62 vs. 46%; p = 0.02), African American (70 vs. 45%; p < 0.01), have a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (28 vs. 15%; p = 0.01), and a higher median Charlson Comorbidity Index score (6.5 vs. 4.0; p < 0.01). After adjusting for other factors, African Americans had three times the odds of developing AKI compared to other racial groups among patients admitted with a COVID-19 diagnosis (OR 3.09; 95% CI 1.49 - 6.41). CONCLUSION: Among the 254 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, we observed a high prevalence of AKI. However, a majority of survivors demonstrated renal recovery at the time of discharge. African American race was strongly associated with development of AKI and portended a poor prognosis.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , COVID-19 , Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Teste para COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2
5.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 21(1): 544, 2021 Jun 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34078374

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sepsis survivors experience high morbidity and mortality, and healthcare systems lack effective strategies to address patient needs after hospital discharge. The Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program is a navigator-led, telehealth-based multicomponent strategy to provide proactive care coordination and monitoring of high-risk patients using evidence-driven, post-sepsis care tasks. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of STAR to improve outcomes for sepsis patients and to examine contextual factors that influence STAR implementation. METHODS: This study uses a hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation design to concurrently test clinical effectiveness and gather implementation data. The effectiveness evaluation is a two-arm, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial at eight hospitals in North Carolina comparing clinical outcomes between sepsis survivors who receive Usual Care versus care delivered through STAR. Each hospital begins in a Usual Care control phase and transitions to STAR in a randomly assigned sequence (one every 4 months). During months that a hospital is allocated to Usual Care, all eligible patients will receive usual care. Once a hospital transitions to STAR, all eligible patients will receive STAR during their hospitalization and extending through 90 days from discharge. STAR includes centrally located nurse navigators using telephonic counseling and electronic health record-based support to facilitate best-practice post-sepsis care strategies including post-discharge review of medications, evaluation for new impairments or symptoms, monitoring existing comorbidities, and palliative care referral when appropriate. Adults admitted with suspected sepsis, defined by clinical criteria for infection and organ failure, are included. Planned enrollment is 4032 patients during a 36-month period. The primary effectiveness outcome is the composite of all-cause hospital readmission or mortality within 90 days of discharge. A mixed-methods implementation evaluation will be conducted before, during, and after STAR implementation. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation will test the effectiveness of STAR to reduce combined hospital readmissions and mortality, while identifying key implementation factors. Results will provide practical information to advance understanding of how to integrate post-sepsis management across care settings and facilitate implementation, dissemination, and sustained utilization of best-practice post-sepsis management strategies in other heterogeneous healthcare delivery systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04495946 . Submitted July 7, 2020; Posted August 3, 2020.


Assuntos
Sepse , Sobrevivência , Adulto , Assistência ao Convalescente , Humanos , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Alta do Paciente , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sepse/terapia
6.
JAMA Surg ; 156(3): 221-228, 2021 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33439221

RESUMO

Importance: Postdischarge video-based virtual visits are a growing aspect of surgical care and have dramatically increased in the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of all-cause 30-day hospital encounter proportion among patients who have a postdischarge video-based virtual visit follow-up compared with in-person follow-up. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, active, controlled noninferiority trial in an urban setting, including patients from a small community hospital and a large, tertiary care hospital. Patients who underwent minimally invasive appendectomy or cholecystectomy by a group of surgeons who cover emergency general surgery at these 2 hospitals were included. Patients undergoing elective and nonelective procedures were included. Interventions: Patients were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to video-based virtual visit or in-person visit. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome is the percentage of patients with 30-day hospital encounter, and we hypothesized that there would not be a significant increase in the 30-day hospital encounter proportion for patients who receive video-based virtual postdischarge care compared with patients who receive standard (in-person) care. Hospital encounter includes emergency department visit, observation, or inpatient admission. Results: A total of 1645 patients were screened; 289 patients were randomized to the virtual group and 143 to the in-person group. Fifty-three patients crossed over to the in-person follow-up group. The percentage of patients who had a hospital encounter was noninferior for virtual visits (12.8% vs 13.3% for in-person, Δ 0.5% with 1-sided 95% CI, -∞ to 5.2%). The amount of time patients spent with the clinician (mean of 8.4 minutes virtual vs 7.8 minutes in-person; P = .30) was not different, but the median overall postoperative visit time was 27.5 minutes shorter (95% CI, -33.5 to -24.0). Conclusions and Relevance: Postdischarge video-based virtual visits did not increase hospital encounter proportions and provided shorter overall time commitment but equal time with the surgical team member. This information will help surgeons and patients feel more confident in using video-based virtual visits. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03258177.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente , Apendicectomia , Colecistectomia , Telemedicina , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Alta do Paciente , Comunicação por Videoconferência , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...