Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Esp Urol ; 51(10): 965-70, 1998 Dec.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9951116

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze our experience in the management of complications of ureteroenteric reimplantation in patients undergoing urinary diversion by endourological techniques or open surgery, in order to identify a useful algorithm that takes the oncologic prognosis into account, as well as the probability of success. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 136 patients who had undergone urinary diversion from 1987-1998. Of these, 126 had transitional cell carcinoma, two had infiltrating carcinoma, two had a benign condition and 6 had undergone urinary diversion for patient comfort without cystectomy. The following techniques were utilized: cutaneous ureteroileostomy or Bricker technique (104 patients), Mainz neobladder (10 patients), ileal neobladder (15 patients), colonic conduit (5 patients) and cutaneous ureter (2 patients). RESULTS: Overall, 56 patients (41%) had some type of alteration at the ureteroenteric reimplantation site, but only 36 (26%) required intervention. The reimplantation techniques utilized were: the Bricker direct ureteroileostomy (26 patients), Le Duc (6 patients), Leadbetter (3 patients), and the direct cutaneous technique (1 patient). Patient mean age was 67 years (range 53-80). There were 35 males and one female. Seven patients required immediate reimplantation due to a persistent urinary fistula and 29 had late obstruction (more than 3 months), accounting for 21.3% of the cases undergoing urinary diversion. The antegrade endourological approach was utilized in 24 patients (5 nephrostomy alone and 19 stent or balloon dilatation). Dilatation was performed palliatively in 6 cases with extensive tumor spread. Permanent success was achieved in 5 cases (38%) and in spite of the initial success, there were 4 reobstructions. Open surgery was performed in 24 patients (66% of the complicated reimplantations); 5 of these patients had another pathology that warranted laparotomy, 7 required reimplantation early due to a fistula and two patients with a nonfunctioning kidney underwent nephrectomy. Ureteral replacement using the ileum was performed in 4 patients and direct reimplantation to the primary loop was performed in 6 patients. Good surgical results were consistently achieved. CONCLUSIONS: The complication rate of ureteral reimplantation is high in patients undergoing urinary diversion. Endourology has an important role in these cases, particularly in patients with a poor prognosis. Surgery achieves the best results. Although they may entail difficulty, complex cases such as extensive ureteral necrosis can be managed successfully.


Assuntos
Derivação Urinária/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colo/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Íleo/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Derivação Urinária/métodos , Fístula Urinária/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...