Positive effects of cold atmospheric plasma on pH in wounds: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) is a promising new option for the treatment of hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. The aim of this study was to observe the effect of CAP on wound pH, as a correlation between the pH of a wound and its healing tendency has been established in the literature. METHOD: Patients with hard-to-heal wounds were treated with CAP in addition to standard treatment. Treatment was performed with the aid of a small, mobile plasma device, which was used for one minute at a time during dressing changes. The pH value, wound size, and other parameters, such as exudate and signs of infection, were recorded for each treatment. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients took part in the study. During the observation period, there was a significant reduction in pH from a markedly alkaline pH of 9.6 to a neutral pH of 7. This was accompanied by a marked reduction in wound size by an average of 76% with seven applications of CAP within 28 days. The evaluation of tissue granulation, exudate and signs of infection showed a positive trend. CONCLUSION: The number of patients in the present study is not sufficient to prove the relationship between the pH value of the wound and the treatment with CAP. However, there are clear indications that the positive effects of CAP on wound healing, which are recognised in several publications, are also due to its influence on wound pH value.

Management of hard-to-heal leg ulcers with an acid-oxidising solution versus standard of care: the MACAN study.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of available wound dressings in the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds is limited. A new therapeutic approach using an acid-oxidising solution (AOS) was developed. Its effect on healing progress, tolerability and safety properties were investigated in a clinical study, and compared with standard of care (SOC) wound dressings. The study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of AOS to SOC in terms of wound healing progress. METHOD: This open-label, randomised controlled trial was conducted at two study centres in Austria with patients with either infected or non-infected hard-to-heal leg ulcers of different aetiology. Patients were treated for six weeks either with AOS or SOC wound dressings. Outcome assessments included the percentage of granulation and re-epithelialisation tissue, wound size reduction, changes in wound pH, infection control and wound pain, local tolerability and adverse events (AEs). Healing time and rate were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients took part. In the AOS group, wounds exhibited higher amounts of granulation and re-epithelialisation tissue, and a faster and more pronounced wound size reduction compared with wounds in the SOC group. In the AOS-treated versus SOC-treated patients, a greater percentage of complete healing of hard-to-heal ulcers was achieved by the end of the study period (32% versus 8%, respectively). Furthermore, the wound pH decreased significantly faster in these wounds (p<0.0001). In all patients with infected leg ulcers, local infection was overcome more rapidly under AOS treatment. In the AOS group, one AE and no serious adverse events (SAEs) were detected versus 24 AEs and two SAEs in the SOC group. CONCLUSION: In this study, AOS proved to be a highly effective treatment to support wound healing in infected or non-infected hard-to-heal leg ulcers of different aetiology. Efficacy was found to be not only non-inferior but superior to SOC wound dressings. Furthermore, tolerability and safety profiles were favourable for AOS.

The Management of Critically Colonized and Locally Infected Leg Ulcers with an Acid-Oxidizing Solution: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: Critical colonization or local infection is very common in chronic wounds, but clinically problematic. Because therapeutic options for these conditions are limited in number and efficacy, the study authors tested a new acid-oxidizing solution (AOS [Nexodyn]; APR Applied Pharma Research S.A., Balerna, Switzerland) to determine its ancillary antimicrobial properties and potential support for wound healing. DESIGN AND SETTING: This open-label clinical case series was conducted with a prospective, single-arm design at the Federal County Hospital in Bregenz, Austria. PATIENTS: In the study, 30 patients with critically colonized or locally infected chronic leg ulcers of any origin were included. INTERVENTIONS: The AOS was applied on each leg ulcer at every dressing change for 35 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The tolerability and performance of the AOS were assessed by evaluating the ulcer characteristics and comparing them with those at baseline. The clinical course of wounds was analyzed using standard measures for bioburden, local infection, pain, pH, and wound healing. MAIN RESULTS: Application of the solution was well tolerated, and no adverse events were recorded. In all patients, local infection was overcome, and wound bed pH and wound area decreased significantly. In addition, patient pain levels decreased to a level where interventions were not required after study day 7. In 37% of all patients, a complete resolution of chronic ulcers was achieved by the end of the study period. CONCLUSION: According to these results, the AOS seems to be a valid and highly tolerable treatment to support wound healing in locally infected ulcers. Nevertheless, larger controlled cohort studies are needed to substantiate these findings.

Case 3: chronic venous leg ulcer.

A non-healing, sloughy venous leg ulcer quickly responded to topical treatment including octenilin Wound Gel and octenilin Wound Irrigation Solution. Full healing occurred within 6 weeks.

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of octenidine wound gel in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers in comparison to modern wound dressings.

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of an octenidine-based wound gel in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers. For this purpose, 49 wounds were treated with either modern wound-phase-adapted dressings alone (treatment arm 1; n = 17), octenidine wound gel plus modern wound-phase-adapted dressings (treatment arm 2; n = 17) or octenidine wound gel alone (treatment arm 3; n = 15). During the study period of 42 days with dressing changes every 3-5 days, wound healing characteristics and treatment costs of different dressings were analysed. Wound size reduction was significantly better (P = 0·028) in both octenidine wound gel treatment arms compared to modern dressings alone with total reductions of 14·6%, 64·1% and 96·2% in treatment arms 1-3. Early wound healing was merely observed under octenidine wound gel treatment (n = 9), whereby lowest treatment costs were generated by octenidine wound gel alone (€20·34/dressing change). As a result, the octenidine wound gel is cost-effective and well suitable for the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers, considering both safety and promotion of wound healing.