Smart dry powder inhalers and intelligent adherence management.

Adherence to inhaled treatments is a complex challenge for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, it not only involves following the prescribed treatment plans but also administering the medications correctly. When using a dry powder inhaler (DPI), the inhalation flow is particularly critical. Patients frequently fail to use a rapid enough onset and fast enough inhalation when using DPIs. At the same time, there is increasing pressure on physicians to switch patients to DPIs, to minimise the environmental impact of pMDI propellants. This makes it critical to understand whether a patient will maintain or improve disease control by using their new inhaler correctly. However, it is challenging for health care professionals to understand how a patient behaves away from the clinic. Therefore, it would be beneficial to obtain real-world data through the use of monitoring tools, i.e., "smart inhalers". This paper reviews the technologies used to monitor DPIs, how effective they have been in a clinical setting, and how well these have been adopted by patients and health care providers.

Regional Lung Deposition: In Vivo Data.

The method section of this chapter on in vivo regional lung deposition highlights a nonradioactive method to measure regional deposition, which uses a photometer to quantify inhaled and exhaled particles and in that way is able to estimate the lung region from which the particles are exhaled and to what amount. The radioactive methods cover the measurement of clearance of the deposited particles as well as different imaging techniques to determine regional deposition. The result section reviews in vivo trials in human subjects. It also addresses different parameters that influence the regional deposition in the lungs: particle size, inhalation maneuver, carrier gas, disease, and inhalation device. All of these factors can affect regional deposition significantly. By choosing specific values of these parameters, it should be feasible to target different regions of the lungs for the therapy of different diseases.

Reducing Aerosol-Related Risk of Transmission in the Era of COVID-19: An Interim Guidance Endorsed by the International Society of Aerosols in Medicine.

National and international guidelines recommend droplet/airborne transmission and contact precautions for those caring for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in ambulatory and acute care settings. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, an acute respiratory infectious agent, is primarily transmitted between people through respiratory droplets and contact routes. A recognized key to transmission of COVID-19, and droplet infections generally, is the dispersion of bioaerosols from the patient. Increased risk of transmission has been associated with aerosol generating procedures that include endotracheal intubation, bronchoscopy, open suctioning, administration of nebulized treatment, manual ventilation before intubation, turning the patient to the prone position, disconnecting the patient from the ventilator, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, tracheostomy, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The knowledge that COVID-19 subjects can be asymptomatic and still shed virus, producing infectious droplets during breathing, suggests that health care workers (HCWs) should assume every patient is potentially infectious during this pandemic. Taking actions to reduce risk of transmission to HCWs is, therefore, a vital consideration for safe delivery of all medical aerosols. Guidelines for use of personal protective equipment (glove, gowns, masks, shield, and/or powered air purifying respiratory) during high-risk procedures are essential and should be considered for use with lower risk procedures such as administration of uncontaminated medical aerosols. Bioaerosols generated by infected patients are a major source of transmission for SARS CoV-2, and other infectious agents. In contrast, therapeutic aerosols do not add to the risk of disease transmission unless contaminated by patients or HCWs.

Lung Deposition of the Dry Powder Fixed Combination Beclometasone Dipropionate Plus Formoterol Fumarate Using NEXThaler® Device in Healthy Subjects, Asthmatic Patients, and COPD Patients.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the lung deposition and the distribution pattern in the airways of a fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) and formoterol fumarate (FF) (100/6 µg) delivered as an extrafine dry powder formulation (mass median aerodynamic diameter, MMAD (µm) BDP = 1.5; FF = 1.4) through the NEXThaler® device in healthy subjects, asthmatics, and patients with COPD. METHODS: Healthy subjects (n = 10), asthmatic patients (n = 9; 30%≤FEV1 < 80%), and COPD patients (n = 9; FEV1/FVC ≤70%, 30%≤FEV1 < 50%) completed this open-label, single administration (inhalation of four actuations) parallel group study. After inhalation of 99mTc-radiolabeled BDP/FF combination (radiolabeled BDP + unlabeled FF), the drug deposition was assessed using a gamma-scintigraphy technique. Patients' lung function was assessed. RESULTS: No significant difference in drug deposition was observed between the three study groups. Mean lung deposition, extrathoracic deposition, and amount exhaled ranged, respectively, between 54.9% and 56.2%, between 41.8% and 43.2%, and between 1.6% and 3.3% of BDP emitted dose (71.7 ± 2.5 µg) for the three study groups. The central to peripheral ratio (reflecting the lung distribution pattern) ranged between 1.23 and 2.02 for the three study groups, indicating a distribution of the drug throughout the airways, including periphery. The study treatment produced a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) increase over time, reaching a maximum improvement generally within 1-4 hours. CONCLUSIONS: The fixed extrafine dry powder combination BDP/FF (100/6 µg) administered through the DPI NEXThaler® achieved similar intrapulmonary deposition in healthy subjects, in asthmatic patients, and COPD patients (approximately 55% of emitted dose) irrespective of the underlying lung disease with a negligible amount of exhaled particles. The study showed high reliability of the device, reproducible dosing, and distribution throughout the lungs. The results supported the concept of efficient delivery of the combination to the target pulmonary regions, thanks to the extrafine formulation. FEV1 profile confirmed a relevant pharmacodynamic effect of the product.

Lung Deposition of Alpha1-Proteinase Inhibitor (Human) (A1-PI[H]) Inhalation Solution Using Two Inhalation Modes of the I-neb Adaptive Aerosol Delivery (AAD) System in Healthy Subjects and Subjects with Cystic Fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: In cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, inhalation of alpha1-proteinase inhibitor (A1-PI) can prevent or slow down persistent infections and reduce the massive ongoing inflammation and excessive levels of NE that destroy the airway epithelium, leading to progressive loss of pulmonary function and death. It is essential for an efficient treatment with inhaled A1-PI that an adequate and reproducible dose is deposited within all regions of the lung. The I-neb AAD System provides two inhalation modes: the Target Inhalation Mode (TIM) and the Tidal Breathing Mode (TBM). Both were compared in this study for their efficiency to deliver A1-PI to the lungs. METHODS: This was a randomized, open label, cross-over study to investigate the lung deposition of A1-PI in 6 healthy subjects (HS) and 15 CF subjects. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the total lung deposition relative to filling dose of A1-PI inhalation solution using the I-neb AAD System in TIM and in TBM. The main secondary endpoints were extra-thoracic deposition, exhaled drug fraction, nebulizer residue, C/P ratio, and variance of pixel counts. Additional exploratory endpoints were total treatment time and the inhalation time. Radiolabeling was performed considering GMP using a commercially available sterile labeling kit. Radiolabeling was validated using NGI data acquired by gamma scintillation and UV spectrometry. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The intrapulmonary deposition (mean ± SD) in CF subjects was 47.0% ± 6.6% and 46.7% ± 10.3% in TIM and TBM, respectively, and in healthy subjects, 50.0% ± 6.7% and 54.8% ± 7.0% in TIM and TBM, respectively. TIM resulted in an approximately 40% lower treatment time (HS 6.4 min vs. 10.3 min, CF 5.3 min vs. 10.7 min) and less extra-thoracic deposition compared to TBM, and showed a higher residue of drug in the nebulizer, compared to TBM. In both groups, inhalation of a single dose of 77 mg of A1-PI was efficient, safe, and well tolerated using TIM and TBM.

Effects of a helium/oxygen mixture on individuals' lung function and metabolic cost during submaximal exercise for participants with obstructive lung diseases.

BACKGROUND: Helium/oxygen therapies have been studied as a means to reduce the symptoms of obstructive lung diseases with inconclusive results in clinical trials. To better understand this variability in results, an exploratory physiological study was performed comparing the effects of helium/oxygen mixture (78%/22%) to that of medical air. METHODS: The gas mixtures were administered to healthy, asthmatic, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) participants, both moderate and severe (6 participants in each disease group, a total of 30); at rest and during submaximal cycling exercise with equivalent work rates. Measurements of ventilatory parameters, forced spirometry, and ergospirometry were obtained. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in ventilatory and cardiac responses to breathing helium/oxygen during submaximal exercise. For asthmatics, but not for the COPD participants, there was a statistically significant benefit in reduced metabolic cost, determined through measurement of oxygen uptake, for the same exercise work rate. However, the individual data show that there were a mixture of responders and nonresponders to helium/oxygen in all of the groups. CONCLUSION: The inconsistent response to helium/oxygen between individuals is perhaps the key drawback to the more effective and widespread use of helium/oxygen to increase exercise capacity and for other therapeutic applications.

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide in clinical trials: an overview.

Designing clinical trials in asthma it is crucial to find the perfect primary endpoint for showing bioequivalence, especially when the investigational medicinal product is not a bronchodilator, but a substance, which suppresses the inflammatory process, e.g. inhalative corticosteroids (ICS). In the past, lung function parameters were used as the primary endpoint, which entails a long study duration and hundreds of patients. The measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is established as a non-invasive marker for eosinophilic inflammation, and several guidelines focus on that diagnosis. FeNO is a surrogate measure of eosinophilic inflammation and at the same time, eosinophilic airway inflammation is usually steroid responsive. Thus, FeNO should be a part of the clinical management of asthma in ambulatory settings in conjunction with other conventional methods of asthma assessment. Furthermore, FeNO should be used to determine the presence or absence of eosinophilic airway inflammation, to determine the likelihood of steroid responsiveness, to measure response to steroid therapy, and level of inflammation control. In addition, FeNO is a useful tool to monitor patient ICS treatment adherence and allergen exposure. FeNO may be used to predict steroid responsiveness and as a measure to determine the optimal treatment of airway inflammation. FeNO has all characteristics of a good marker for bioequivalence measurements in the market approval process of generic ICS products. With a reliable study design in terms of patient population, concomitant medication, equipment and other factors, which can influence the measurement, efficient clinical trials can be performed, with a relatively short treatment time of 2-4 weeks and 50-100 patients.

An in vitro assessment of aerosol delivery through patient breathing circuits used with medical air or a helium-oxygen mixture.

BACKGROUND: The bench experiments presented herein were conducted in order to investigate the influence of carrier gas, either medical air or a helium-oxygen mixture (78% He, 22% O2), on the droplet size distribution and aerosol mass delivered from a vibrating mesh nebulizer through a patient breathing circuit. METHODS: Droplet size distributions at the exit of the nebulizer T-piece and at the patient end of the breathing circuit were determined by laser diffraction. Additional experiments were performed to determine the effects on measured size distributions of gas humidity and of the droplet residence time during transport from the nebulizer to the laser diffraction measurement volume. Aerosol deposition in the nebulizer, breathing circuit, and on expiratory and patient filters was determined by photometry following nebulization of sodium fluoride solutions into the breathing circuit during simulated patient breathing. RESULTS: With no humidification of the carrier gas, droplet volume median diameter (VMD) at the exit of the nebulizer T-piece was 5.5±0.1 µm for medical air, and 4.3±0.1 µm for helium-oxygen. Varying the aerosol residence time between the nebulizer and the measurement volume did not affect the measured size distributions; however, humidification of the carrier gases reduced differences in VMD at the nebulizer exit between medical air and helium-oxygen. At the patient end of the breathing circuit, droplet VMDs were 1.8±0.1 µm for medical air and 2.2±0.1 µm for helium-oxygen. The percentages of sodium fluoride recovered from the nebulizer, breathing circuit, patient filter, and expiratory filter were, respectively, 29.9±8.3, 40.4±5.6, 8.3±1.5, and 21.5±2.1% for air, and 32.6±2.2, 36.3±0.7, 12.0±1.4, and 19.1±1.1% for helium-oxygen. CONCLUSIONS: Ventilation with helium-oxygen in place of air-oxygen mixtures can influence both the droplet size distribution and mass of nebulized aerosol delivered through patient breathing circuits. Assessment of these effects on aerosol delivery is important when incorporating helium-oxygen into patient ventilation strategies.

Lung deposition of formoterol HFA (Atimos/Forair) in healthy volunteers, asthmatic and COPD patients.

In this study, the influence of lung function on lung deposition of a radioactively labeled Formotoerol HFA MDI (Forair) was investigated. Eighteen subjects were measured: 6 healthy subjects (FEV(1) = 107% pred), 6 patients with Asthma (FEV(1) = 72% pred), and 6 patients with COPD (FEV(1) = 40% pred). The lung deposition of the radioactive-labeled drug was measured with a gamma camera. The lung deposition relative to the emitted dose was 31% for healthy subjects, 34% for asthmatics, and 35% for COPD patients. These data suggest a comparable lung deposition in the different populations. There was no significant correlation between lung function (FEV(1)) and lung deposition. The extrathoracic deposition was around 50%. The finding were that lung deposition of the inhaled Formoterol did not depend on lung function and the relative high values of lung deposition can be explained by the small particle size (0.8 microm) of the HFA-Formoterol-Formulation and the slow inhalation (30 L/min flow) used in this study. It can be concluded, that with this modern HFA drug formulation, the deposition is high, even in obstructed lungs.