Regulatory Strategies for Preventing and Reducing Nicotine Vaping Among Youth: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Many jurisdictions have implemented different regulatory strategies to reduce vaping among youth. The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence of the effectiveness of different regulatory strategies for preventing and reducing nicotine vaping among youth. METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2004 to July 17, 2022 for primary studies examining state/provincial or national regulations targeting vaping among youth (aged 12-21 years) in high-income countries. The primary outcome was vaping prevalence. Included studies were qualitatively synthesized through systematic review. RESULTS: The systematic review included 30 studies. There was insufficient evidence to recommend age restrictions (n=16), restrictions on location of use (n=1), and mixed/combined regulations (n=3). Flavor bans (n=4), sales licenses (n=2), and taxation (n=2) were generally shown to be associated with decreased rates of youth vaping. Warning labels (n=2) were associated with a decreased desire to initiate vaping. Included studies had moderate-to-serious risks of bias. DISCUSSION: Although several regulatory interventions have been shown to be effective at reducing vaping among youth, evidence is insufficient to recommend a specific type of regulation. Regulatory authorities could implement various regulations targeting the price, accessibility, and desirability (i.e., flavors and packaging) of E-cigarettes.

Interventions for Preventing E-Cigarette Use Among Children and Youth: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Many nonregulatory interventions targeting children and youth have been implemented at three levels: directed at the individual (e.g., interactive video games), delivered to students at school (e.g., campus bans), and launched in the community (e.g., mass media campaigns). This systematic review aims to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of interventions aimed at preventing e-cigarette initiation among children and youth. METHODS: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, APA PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched for papers published between January 1, 2004 and September 1, 2022 that reported more than one outcome on vaping prevention among individuals aged less than 21-years-old: vaping prevalence/incidence, initiation intentions, knowledge/attitudes, and other tobacco product use prevalence/initiation intentions. Interventions were at the individual, school, or community level. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 1. RESULTS: Thirty-nine publications met the eligibility criteria. Fourteen individually-based (4 parental monitoring, 3 video games, 2 text messages, 3 graphic message themes, 2 healthcare), 19 school-based (14 educational and skill interventions, 5 vape-free policies/bans), and 6 community-based (3 social media, 3 mass media campaigns) interventions were reported. E-cigarette initiation prevention was observed with high perceived parental monitoring; however, the cross-sectional study designs precluded causal claims. There was promising but limited evidence that social-emotional skills curricula and peer leader programming prevented vaping initiation. DISCUSSION: Some individual- and school-based interventions showed promise for preventing e-cigarette initiation among children and youth.

Evaluating the impact of varying expired carbon monoxide thresholds on smoking relapse identification: insights from the E3 trial on e-cigarette efficacy for smoking cessation.

OBJECTIVES: Expired carbon monoxide (ECO) is often used in smoking cessation trials to biochemically validate self-reported smoking status. The optimal ECO threshold to distinguish individuals who smoke from those who do not is debated. DESIGN: The data from the 'Evaluating the Efficacy of E-Cigarette use for Smoking Cessation (E3) Trial' were used; the E3 trial was a randomised controlled trial that examined e-cigarettes efficacy for smoking cessation. SETTINGS: Participants were recruited from 17 Canadian sites across 4 provinces. PARTICIPANTS: This substudy included data from participants who returned for at least one of the clinical visits at week 4 (291), 12 (257) or 24 (218) and provided both self-reported smoking status and ECO measures. Analyses were based on 766 paired measures (ie, self-reported smoking status with corresponding ECO). RESULTS: The ability of ECO measurements to discriminate between adults who reported smoking and those who reported abstinence varied with the threshold used. ECO thresholds of 6, 7, 8 and 9 parts per million (ppm) yielded the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.84). These thresholds produced sensitivities of 84%, 82%, 78% and 76% and specificities of 84%, 87%, 90% and 91%, respectively. However, at a threshold of 6 ppm, intersecting sensitivity (84%) and specificity (84%) were maximised with respect to each other. Biochemical validation had the highest agreement with self-report at an ECO threshold of 6 ppm (κ=0.57; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.64). CONCLUSION: The classification of participants' smoking status depends on the ECO threshold used for biochemical validation. We recommend that future smoking cessation trial investigators analyse and report the impact that varying ECO thresholds has on trial results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02417467.

Effectiveness of Interventions for Prevention of Common Infections Among Opioid Users: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.

Background: The North American opioid crisis is marked by high opioid-related mortality and morbidity, including opioid use-associated infections (OUAIs). Users of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical opioids are at an increased risk of acquiring hepatitis C (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and other infections. No high-level evidence, however, has been synthesized regarding effectiveness of interventions to prevent OUAIs in legal, and illegal/mixed opioid users. The aim of the study is to synthesize available systematic review (SR)-level evidence on the scope and effectiveness of interventions to prevent OUAIs among opioid users. Methods: A SR of SRs approach was applied. We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Epistemonikos and Google Scholar from inception to September 2020. Data selection and extraction were performed independently by three researchers. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using the AMSTAR2 tool. Results were narratively synthesized. Strength of evidence for each category was reported. Results: Eleven of twelve identified SRs included interventions to prevent HCV/HIV transmission in persons who inject drugs (PWID), including opioids. One SR evaluated interventions to prevent recurrent infectious endocarditis. There was sufficient and tentative SR of SRs-level evidence for the effectiveness of opioid substitution therapy (OST) in preventing HIV and HCV, respectively. We found tentative evidence to support effectiveness of needle/syringe exchange programs (NSP) in HIV prevention, and sufficient evidence to support effectiveness of the combined OST and NSP in HCV prevention. There was insufficient SR-level evidence to support or discount effectiveness of other interventions to prevent OUAIs. No SR focused on non-PWID populations. Conclusion: SR-level evidence supports the use of OST, NSP, and combined interventions for the reduction of HCV and HIV transmission in PWID. More research on prevention of other OUAIs and on prevention of OUAIs in non-PWID populations is urgently needed. Systematic Review Registration: Registered in PROSPERO on July 30, 2020. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=195929, identifier: #195929.

Effect of e-Cigarettes Plus Counseling vs Counseling Alone on Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for smoking cessation remain controversial. Objective: To evaluate e-cigarettes with individual counseling for smoking cessation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial enrolled adults motivated to quit smoking from November 2016 to September 2019 at 17 Canadian sites (801 individuals screened; 274 ineligible and 151 declined). Manufacturing delays resulted in early termination (376/486 participants, 77% of target). Outcomes through 24 weeks (March 2020) are reported. Interventions: Randomization to nicotine e-cigarettes (n = 128), nonnicotine e-cigarettes (n = 127), or no e-cigarettes (n = 121) for 12 weeks. All groups received individual counseling. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was point prevalence abstinence (7-day recall, biochemically validated using expired carbon monoxide) at 12 weeks, changed from 52 weeks following early termination. Participants missing data were assumed to be smoking. The 7 secondary end points, examined at multiple follow-ups, were point prevalence abstinence at other follow-ups, continuous abstinence, daily cigarette consumption change, serious adverse events, adverse events, dropouts due to adverse effects, and treatment adherence. Results: Among 376 randomized participants (mean age, 52 years; 178 women [47%]), 299 (80%) and 278 (74%) self-reported smoking status at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively. Point prevalence abstinence was significantly greater for nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling vs counseling alone at 12 weeks (21.9% vs 9.1%; risk difference [RD], 12.8 [95% CI, 4.0 to 21.6]) but not 24 weeks (17.2% vs 9.9%; RD, 7.3 [95% CI, -1.2 to 15.7]). Point prevalence abstinence for nonnicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling was not significantly different from counseling alone at 12 weeks (17.3% vs 9.1%; RD, 8.2 [95% CI, -0.1 to 16.6]), but was significantly greater at 24 weeks (20.5% vs 9.9%; RD, 10.6 [95% CI, 1.8 to 19.4]). Adverse events were common (nicotine e-cigarette with counseling: 120 [94%]; nonnicotine e-cigarette with counseling: 118 [93%]; counseling only: 88 [73%]), with the most common being cough (64%) and dry mouth (53%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults motivated to quit smoking, nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling vs counseling alone significantly increased point prevalence abstinence at 12 weeks. However, the difference was no longer significant at 24 weeks, and trial interpretation is limited by early termination and inconsistent findings for nicotine and nonnicotine e-cigarettes, suggesting further research is needed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02417467.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of E-Cigarette Use for Smoking Cessation in the General Population: E3 Trial Design.

BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation improves morbidity and mortality among smokers who achieve long-term abstinence. Many smokers are using electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) to attempt to quit, despite a lack of data concerning their efficacy and safety for smoking cessation. METHODS: The Evaluating the Efficacy of E-Cigarette use for Smoking Cessation (E3) trial is a multicentre randomized controlled trial (NCT02417467) with a treatment period of 12 weeks and follow-up of 52 weeks. A total of 376 participants motivated to quit smoking were enrolled at 17 Canadian centres (November 2016 to September 2019). Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to 1 of 3 treatment arms: nicotine e-cigarettes, non-nicotine e-cigarettes, or no e-cigarettes. All groups received individual counselling. Treatment allocation was double-blind for the e-cigarette groups. The trial includes follow-ups by telephone at weeks 1, 2, 8, and 18, and clinic visits at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. The primary endpoint is to compare nicotine e-cigarettes to counselling alone in terms of biochemically validated point-prevalence smoking abstinence at 12 weeks; the primary endpoint was changed from 52 weeks after early termination (77% of targeted enrollment) due to a prolonged delay in e-cigarette manufacturing. The secondary objectives are to examine the efficacy of nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes in terms of point-prevalence and continuous smoking abstinence, and reduction in daily cigarette consumption at all follow-ups through week 52, and to describe the occurrence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: The E3 trial will provide regulators, health care professionals, and smokers with important information about the efficacy and safety of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.

CONTEXTE: Le sevrage tabagique améliore la morbidité et la mortalité chez les fumeurs qui parviennent à une abstinence à long term. De nombreux fumeurs utilisent des cigarettes électroniques (e-cigarettes) pour tenter d'arrêter de fumer, malgré le manque de données concernant leur efficacité et leur sécurité pour le sevrage tabagique. MÉTHODES: L'essai "Evaluation l'utilisation de la cigarette Électronique (E3)" pour cesser de fumer (E3)" est un essai contrôlé randomisé multicentrique (NCT02417467) avec une période de traitement de 12 semaines et un suivi de 52 semaines. Au total, 376 participants motivés à cesser de fumer ont été inscrits par 17 centres canadiens (de novembre 2016 à septembre 2019). Les participants ont été randomisés (1:1:1) dans l'un des trois groupes de traitement : e-cigarettes à la nicotine, e-cigarettes sans nicotine ou sans e-cigarette. Tous les groupes ont bénéficié de conseils individuels. Pour les groups avec une e-cigarettes, l'attribution des traitements a été faite en double aveugle. L'essai comprend de suivis par téléphone aux semaines 1, 2, 8 et 18, et des visites à la clinique aux semaines 4, 12, 24 et 52. L'objectif principal est de comparer les e-cigarettes nicotinique au conseils seul, en termes d'abstinence tabagique ponctuelle de 7 jours confirmée par un indicateur biochimique validée à 12 semaines; changé de la 52 semaines en raison d'une fin anticipée (77 % des inscriptions ciblées) dû à un retard prolongé dans la fabrication des e-cigarettes. Les objectifs secondaires sont d'examiner l'efficacité des e-cigarettes à la nicotine et sans nicotine en termes de prévalence ponctuelle et de sevrage tabagique continu, et la réduction quotidienne de cigarettes consommer pour l'ensemble des suivis jusqu'à la semaine 52, et de décrire l'occurrence des effets indésirables. CONCLUSION: L'essai E3 fournira aux régulateurs, aux professionnels de la santé et aux fumeurs des informations importantes sur l'efficacité et la sécurité des e-cigarettes pour le sevrage tabagique.

Isolation and functional characterization of a novel endogenous inverse agonist of estrogen related receptors (ERRs) from human pregnancy urine.

Estrogen-receptor related receptors (ERRs) which consists of ERRα, ERRß and ERRγ belong to the orphan nuclear receptor subfamily 3, group B (NR3B) subfamily, and are constitutively active. ERRs have been shown to actively modulate estrogenic responses, and to play an essential role in pregnancy, and are implicated in breast cancer progression. Despite intensive efforts, no endogenous ligand other than the ubiquitous sterol, cholesterol which binds ERRα, has been identified for ERRs so far. The discovery of ligands that bind these orphan receptors will allow the manipulation of this pathway and may lead to novel strategies for the treatment of cancer and other diseases. We previously reported the identification of a novel endogenous estradienolone-like steroid (ED) that is strongly bound to sex hormone binding globulin, in pregnant women. Our recent results show that ED acts as an inverse agonist of ERRα and ERRγ by directly interacting with these receptors, and inhibiting their transcriptional activity. We also demonstrate that ED inhibits the growth of both estrogen receptor-positive (MCF-7) and estrogen receptor-negative (MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cells in a dose dependent manner, while of displaying a little effect on normal epithelial breast cells. Furthermore, the anti-mitogenic effect of ED in breast cancer cells is ERRα-dependent. These data suggest that ED-ERR interaction may represent a novel physiologically relevant hormone response pathway in the human. The finding that ED inhibits both ER negative and ER positive breast cancer cell growth may have important implications in pathophysiology breast cancer.