[Evaluation of GP specialty training in Bavaria - An online survey among postgraduate trainees]. / Einschätzung der Weiterbildung im Fach Allgemeinmedizin in Bayern - eine Online-Befragung von Ärzten in Weiterbildung.

BACKGROUND: Statistical projections suggest that by 2020 the number of general practitioners (GPs) in Germany will have decreased by about 13 %, which will lead to a risk of medical undersupply, especially in rural areas. This study was conducted on behalf of the Bavarian Ministry of Environment and Health in order to answer the following questions: How satisfied are young Bavarian physicians in GP specialty training with their training situation? To what extent are they willing to start a private practice, in general and, in particular, in rural areas? METHOD: The study's online questionnaire contained items concerning the context of GP specialty training and the willingness to set up a private practice. In addition, the "Heidelberger Niederlassungsbarometer", a structured questionnaire illustrating self-assessment of competencies of GPs in training, was included in the survey. We asked GP specialty trainees to participate by e-maiI, directly or via their GP trainers. RESULTS: In total, 99 questionnaires were returned, whereof 95 fulfilled the criteria for analysis. In 76 % of the cases participants were female, 63 % working in practice and 37 % in a structured training programme. The majority of participants (58 %) preferred to work in a practice with more than one GP, followed by those preferring to work as a salaried GP (26 %). Their disposition to work in rural areas after having passed their specialty certificate examination was high or very high (59 %). Feedback on a regular basis was given to 29 % of the study participants. Almost every second participant received a structured initial training programme. Most of the participating GP trainees (59%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their training. CONCLUSION: In general, there is a high level of motivation among study participants to become an independent and self-employed GP, also in rural areas. Despite the fact that not even every second received central training elements like individual feedback and structured initial training, the participants were mostly satisfied with their GP specialty training.

The effect of mental comorbidity on service delivery planning in primary care: an analysis with particular reference to patients who request referral without prior assessment.

BACKGROUND: In their everyday practice, primary-care physicians are often asked to refer patients to a specialist without a prior appointment in primary care. Such referrals are problematic, and one might suspect that patients who make such requests are more likely to have mental comorbidities predisposing them toward higher utilization of health-care services. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 307 patients of 13 primary-care practices who requested referral to a specialist without a prior appointment in primary care were given a Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) containing questions that related to depression, anxiety, panic disorder, and somatoform disorder (independent variables). Further information was obtained about these patients' primary-care contacts, referrals, and days taken off from work with a medical excuse over the course of one year (dependent variables). A regression model was used to compare these patients with 977 other primary-care patients. RESULTS: The groups of patients who did and did not request specialist referral without a primary-care appointment did not differ to any statistically significant extent with respect to mental comorbidity. In the overall group, somatoform disorder was found to be associated with a high rate of primary-care contacts (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-4.3). High rates of referral were strongly correlated (percentage of variance explained, R²) with depression (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.0; R² = 35.3%), anxiety (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.8-9.6; R² = 34.5%), panic disorder (OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.1-16.4; R² = 34.3%), and somatoform disorder (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.0; R² = 34.6%). Taking a long time off from work with a medical excuse was correlated with depression (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-4.8), anxiety (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.7-10.5), and somatoform disorder (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.2). CONCLUSION: Mental comorbidity contributes to the increased utilization of health-care services. This should be borne in mind whenever a patient requests many referrals to specialists (either with or without a prior appointment in primary care). It is important to identify "doctor-hopping" patients so that the causes of their behavior can be recognized, discussed, and properly treated.

The impact of psychosomatic co-morbidity on discordance with respect to reasons for encounter in general practice.

OBJECTIVE: Concordance between general practitioners (GPs) and patients is an essential requirement for treatment success and patient satisfaction in general practice. The objectives of this were to estimate the total amount of discordance with respect to reason for encounter (RFE) during consultation in German general practices, and to explore the influence of psychosomatic co-morbidity of the patients in case of discordance. METHODS: 1101 consecutive patients completed a questionnaire, including questions about the RFE and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). RFEs, as stated by the patients and diagnosed by the GPs were matched according to a predefined index. Factors that may influence the level of discordance between patients' RFE and GPs' RFE were analysed. RESULTS: Amount of concordance was 74.9%, incomplete concordance 11.2%, discordance in different physical RFEs was 9.1%, and discordance when GPs diagnosed psychosomatic illness while patients presented physical complaints was found in 2.5%. The number of RFE (OR 3.03; 95%CI 2.48-3.69; P<.001), depression (OR 2.27; 95%CI 1.51-3.41), anxiety (OR 1.78; 95%CI 1.03-3.10) and somatisation syndrome (OR 2.20; 95%CI 1.50-3.22) significantly predicted incomplete concordance and discordance, respectively. The number of RFE was significantly associated with depression (OR 1.32; 95%CI 1.09-1.61) and somatoform syndrome (OR 1.45; 95%CI 1.21-1.74). CONCLUSION: The considerable amount of discordance and incomplete concordance can partly be explained by the psychosomatic co-morbidity of the patients. If it is seen as a fundamental right of patients to be adequately understood, more efforts are necessary to improve patient centredness. Further studies have to evaluate if improvement of identification of psychosomatic co-morbidity might reduce discordance.

How do patients from eastern and western Germany compare with regard to their preferences for shared decision making?

BACKGROUND: Increasing emphasis is being placed on involving patients in decisions concerning their health. This shift towards more patient engagement by health professionals and towards more desire by patients for participation may be partly based on socio-political factors. METHODS: To compare the preferences for shared decision making of patients from eastern and western Germany we analysed five patient samples (n = 2318) (general practice patients and schizophrenia patients from eastern and western Germany). Patients' role preferences for shared decisions were measured using the decision-making subscale of the Autonomy Preference Index. RESULTS: Patients resident in eastern Germany expressed lower preferences for shared decision making than patients in western Germany. This was true after controlling for socio-demographic variables and for patient group. CONCLUSION: The cultural imprint (e.g. western vs. former communist society) seems to have a significant influence on patients' expectations and behaviour in the medical encounter. Health services providers need to be aware that health attitudes within the same health system might vary for historical and cultural reasons. The engagement of patients in medical decisions might not be susceptible to a 'one size fits all' approach; doctors should instead aim to accommodate the individual patient's desire for autonomy.

Unlimited access to health care--impact of psychosomatic co-morbidity on utilisation in German general practices.

BACKGROUND: The effect of psychosomatic co-morbidity on resource use for systems with unlimited access remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact on practice visits, referrals and periods of disability in German general practices and to identify predictors of health care utilisation. METHODS: Cross sectional observational study in 13 practices in Upper Bavaria. Patients were included consecutively and filled in the Patients Health Questionnaire (PHQ). Numbers of practice visits, referrals and periods of disability within the last twelve months and permanent mental and somatic diagnoses were extracted manually by review of the computerised charts. Physicians in Germany are obliged to document repetitive reasons of encounter as permanent diagnoses in terms of ICD-10-codes. These ICD-10-codes are used for legitimisation of reimbursement in German general practices. RESULTS: 1005 patients were included (58.6% female). On average, patients had 15.3 (sd 16.3) practice contacts, 3.8 (sd 4.2) referrals and 7.5 (sd 23.1) days of disability per year. The mean number of coded permanent diagnoses was 0.4 (sd 0.7) for mental and 4.0 (sd 4.0) for somatic diagnoses. Patients with mental diagnoses scored higher in depression, anxiety, panic and somatoform disorder scales of PHQ. Frequent practice visits were associated stronger with coded permanent mental diagnoses (OR 20.0; 95%CI 7.5-53.9) than with coded permanent somatic diagnoses (OR 14.4; 95%CI 5.9-35.4). Frequent referrals were associated stronger with somatic diagnoses (OR 4.9; 95%CI 2.0-11.9) than with mental diagnoses (OR 3.6; 95%CI 1.4-9.8). Periods of disability were predicted by mental diagnoses (OR 5.0; 95%CI 1.6-15.8) but not by somatic diagnoses (OR 2.5; 95%CI 0.7-8.1). CONCLUSIONS: Psychosomatic co-morbidity has a stronger impact on health care utilisation in German general practices with respect to practice visits and periods of disability whereas somatic disorders play a stronger role for referrals. Time constraints in the practices might lead to frequent contacts as too little time is left for patients with mental problems. Therefore, structural changes in the health care reimbursement systems might be necessary. Mental diagnoses might be helpful to identify patients at risk for high health care utilisation. However, the use of routinely coded diagnoses for reimbursement might lead to distorted estimation of resource use.