Outcome after resection of hepatic and pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal therapies (especially surgery of metastases and "aggressive" chemotherapy) in patients with metastases of colorectal cancers (CRC) are increasingly performed and may provide long-term survival in selected patients with more than one location of metastases. In the current literature, there are only few studies with relatively low patient numbers reporting on the outcome after resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases of CRC. We therefore evaluated survival of patients who underwent sequential resection of hepatic and pulmonary metastases under potentially curative intention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1987 until 2006, 44 patients (32% female; median age, 58 years) with hepatic and pulmonary CRC metastases underwent resections at both metastatic sites. The primary CRCs were in 50% rectal and in 50% colonic carcinomas (61% node positive, all with free resection margins). Metastases occurred synchronously (regarding primary CRC) in 32% of the patients. In 86%, liver resection was performed prior to pulmonary resection. The first resection of metastases was performed a median of 16 months after resection of the primary CRC; the median interval between the first and the second resection of metastases was 7 months. Forty-seven percent of the patients also underwent at least a third metastasectomy. During resection of the first and second site of metastases, free margins were achieved in 98% and 95%, respectively. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates (SV) were 64% after initial surgery of CRC, 42% after the first resection of metastases, and 27% after the last metastasectomy. Patients with synchronous metastases had a 5-year SV after first metastasectomy of 43% and in patients with metachronous metastases of 41% (n.s.). The location of the primary tumor (20% 5-year SV in rectal vs. 57% in colonic cancer; p < 0.02) and the lung as primary site of metastatic disease (5-year SV 0% vs. 60% in patients with primarily hepatic metastases only; p < 0.001) significantly influenced survival in univariate analysis. Patients with rectal cancer had a significantly higher frequency of the lung as first metastatic site (46%) compared to patients with colonic cancer (14%; p < 0.03). Multivariate survival analysis revealed the lung as first metastatic site and as the sole significant independent factor for the outcome (p < 0.001; relative risk vs. liver first metastases 4.7). CONCLUSION: In selected patients with metastasized CRC resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases may improve survival rates or even provide long-term survival. Patients with lung as the first site of metastatic disease (either lung only or in combination with hepatic metastases) have a significantly worse outcome than patients with metastases primarily confined to the liver.

Sublobar resections in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: segmentectomies result in significantly better cancer-related survival than wedge resections.

OBJECTIVE: Sublobar resections spare pulmonary function and offer a method of increasing resection rates in patients with lung cancer and limited functional operability. Previous studies demonstrated an increased local recurrence rate following wedge resections compared to segmentectomies in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a prognostic impact of this observation has never been shown and is still under debate. Therefore, this study has been performed to analyse the cancer-related survival of sublobar resections in stage IA patients. METHODS: Over a 17-year period 87 patients underwent sublobar complete resection (R0) of stage IA NSCLC via thoracotomy. Sublobar resection was reserved for patients with cardiopulmonary impairment. Wedge resections with selective lymphadenectomy were performed in 31 patients (36%) and segmentectomies with systematic lymphadenectomy in 56 patients (64%). Patient characteristics, functional parameters, tumour specifics and follow-up duration were analysed concerning their distribution between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared and possible joint effects between prognostic parameters were analysed by multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 45 months. There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender (p=0.11), age (p=0.08), American Society of Anesthesiology physical performance status (ASA)-score (p=0.32), forced expiratory volume in 1s FEV(1) (p=0.08), tumour size (p=0.30), histology (p=0.17), grading (p=0.12), complication rate (p=0.15) and follow-up duration (p=0.29). The mean number of dissected lymph nodes in segmentectomies (12+/-6) was higher than in wedge resections (6+/-3) (p=0.0001). The 5-year survival rate was 63%. There were significantly less locoregional recurrences (p=0.001), an equal distribution of distant metastases (p=0.53) and a better cancer-related survival (p=0.016) following segmentectomies compared to wedge resections. Cox regression analysis showed that the prognostic effect of the resection type was independent from gender, age, ASA-score, respiratory function, tumour size, tumour histology, grading and number of dissected lymph nodes (p=0.04, relative risk 1.16). CONCLUSIONS: Studies investigating survival after sublobar resection of stage IA NSCLC should always distinguish between anatomical segmentectomies and wedge resections. If limited functional operability requires a sublobar resection of stage IA NSCLC, segmentectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy should be preferred.