TV news and concerns about - the EHEC-outbreak 2011 in Germany.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In the beginning of May 2011 and finally terminated on July 26th 2011 an outbreak of infections with enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia (E.) coli (EHEC) strain O104:H4 occurred in Germany. The aim of this study is to analyse whether media coverage of the outbreak influenced the number of patients presenting with diarrhoea to the emergency room of a tertiary centre and to evaluate the influence of information on perception and rating of symptoms. METHODS: Prospectively collected data in a tertiary centre on the number of patients presenting to the emergency room with diarrhea during the EHEC outbreak was correlated with retrospectively collected data about the media coverage of the outbreak on TV and compared to the number of patients that had presented with diarrhea during a comparative period in 2010. RESULTS: A total of 1,625 patients presented to our emergency room during the observation period in 2011 between May 31st and June 13th, including 72 patients (4.4%) presenting with the predominant symptom of diarrhoea, of whom six patients (0.4%) reported haemorrhagic diarrhoea. In the comparative period in 2010, between May 31st and June 13th, twelve patients (1.6%) presenting the symptom of diarrhea were treated in our emergency room. The analysis of the news reports in 2011 revealed a total of 1,150 reports broadcast in the ARD and a total of 173 reports broadcast in the regional news channel MDR between May 29th and June 11th. In 2010 not a single report regarding our search terms was broadcast in the corresponding time period. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest a clear positive correlation of the frequency of TV reports dealing with the epidemic disease outbreak and the rate of outpatient consultations in emergency rooms because of diarrhoea and could make an important contribution for future discussions.

[The G-DRG system 2008. Relevant changes for rheumatology]. / Das G-DRG-System 2008. Relevante Neuerungen für die Rheumatologie.

The G-DRG system 2008 once again brings many changes to rheumatological departments in Germany. The following article presents the main general and specific changes in the G-DRG system, as well as in the classification systems for diagnoses and procedures and in invoicing for 2008. Since the G-DRG system is only a tool for the redistribution of resources, every hospital needs to analyze the economic effects of the system by applying the G-DRG transition grouper to its own cases. Depending on their clinical focus, rheumatological departments may experience positive or negative effects from the system's application. The strain placed on hospitals by the inadequate funding of increased costs needs to be assessed separately from the effects of redistribution by the G-DRG system.

[Clinical pathways in rheumatological inpatient treatment - a structured process management]. / Klinische Behandlungspfade in der akut-stationären Rheumatologie - ein strukturiertes Prozessmanagement.

Clinical pathways for three rheumatological indications have been successfully developed in the rheumatological departments of two hospitals. These diseases were selected because of the number of inpatients seen and/or the costs for diagnostics and therapy. Three quota-concepts, the coordination of treatment processes (quota-concept I), the sequence of implementing services (quota-concept II), and the economical utilization of available resources as well as the transparent definition of therapies (quota-concept III) have been established. These concepts have been tested individually as well as in complex situations.

[Cooperation between primary care physicians and rheumatologists in Lower Saxony. Results of a survey of primary care physicians]. / Kooperation zwischen Hausärzten und Rheumatologen in Niedersachsen. Ergebnisse einer Hausarztbefragung.

AIM: Between 2000 and 2003 the collaborative arthritis center Hanover implemented a quality management program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Fourteen rheumatologists in private practice participated in this model project. One of the aims of the project was to improve the cooperation between primary care physicians and rheumatologists. A survey of the primary care physicians was conducted to evaluate rheumatological care. METHODS: A total of 340 patients with RA were included in the study. All primary care physicians of these patients were informed about the goals of the project and asked to answer a questionnaire on cooperation with rheumatologists. The questionnaire contained 14 questions and was sent to 270 primary care physicians. RESULTS: Of the primary care physicians, 83% returned the questionnaire, and 81% percent of these were family practitioners. The primary care physicians treated a mean of 19 patients with RA, of whom 14 were attended in cooperation with rheumatologists. High mean values were found for satisfaction with different aspects of rheumatological patient care on a numerical rating scale from 0 (not satisfied at all) to 10 (completely satisfied). Mean values for satisfaction: diagnosis 7.9, therapy recommendations 7.6, follow-up 7.2,and usefulness of medical report 7.7. A total of 70% of primary care physicians reported difficulties in realizing the recommendations of the rheumatologists. Of the respondents, 90% saw a need for improvement in cooperation with rheumatologists, the most frequently mentioned being the difficulty of consultation with appointments. CONCLUSION: This survey of primary care physicians of patients with RA reveals a positive assessment of the cooperation with rheumatologists. The problems which exist mainly concern the realization of recommendations. There is a great requirement for further improvement in the cooperation between primary care physicians and rheumatologists.

[What changes for rheumatologists in the G-DRG system 2006?]. / Was ändert sich für die Rheumatologie im G-DRG-System 2006?

Once more, the revision of the German DRG catalogue 2006 provides for more accurate reimbursement, particularly for specialised medical services. The newly established DRG I97Z (Rheumatologische Komplexbehandlung bei Krankheiten und Störungen an Muskel-Skelett-System und Bindegewebe) for the complex and multimodal treatment of rheumatic diseases allows an accurate picture of clinical practice in specialized rheumatologic departments and hospitals. Using this specific DRG-description, it will be possible to reduce the financial pressure which results from the redistribution of budgets in the second year of the period of convergence. A precondition for the affected hospitals is to deal with budget planning and calculation of G-DRGs without calculated cost weights for 2006. In addition, this article discusses the relevance of other modifications to the G-DRG system, additional payments, the conditions for payment, the coding standards, and the classification systems for diagnosis and procedures.

[Increasingly appropriate depiction of rheumatology for G-DRG reimbursement 2006]. / Zunehmend sachgerechte Abbildung der Rheuma- tologie im G-DRG- Fallpauschalensystem 2006.

Starting with the second year of the so called "convergence period", specialized rheumatological treatment is now represented by a specific DRG (197Z) in the German G-DRG system. The definition of this DRG is based on the procedure codes for the complex and multimodal treatment of rheumatological inpatients (OPS 8-983 and 8-986). This will result in a more appropriate reimbursement of rheumatological treatment. The implementation of specialized rheumatological treatment can be regarded as exemplary for the incorporation of medical specializations into DRG systems. The first step is the definition of the characteristics by procedure codes, which can consequently be utilized within the grouping algorithm. After an inadequate representation of a medical specialization within the DRG system has been demonstrated, a new DRG will be established. As no cost data were available, the calculation of a cost weight for the new G-DRG 197Z is not yet possible for 2006. Hence, reimbursement has to be negotiated between the individual hospital and the budget commission of the health insurers. In this context, the use of clinical pathways is considered helpful.

[Early diagnosis of arthritis and spondyloarthritis within the framework of integrated health care in Lower Saxony]. / Frühdiagnose von Arthri- tiden und Spondyloarthri- tiden im Rahmen einer Integrierten Versorgung in Niedersachsen.

In September 2005, the Collaborative Arthritis Center in Hannover, the Hannover Medical School, general practitioners, rheumatologists in private practice, the League against Rheumatism in Lower Saxony (Rheuma-Liga Niedersachsen, a regional patient self-help organization), the State Pension Authority (Deutsche Rentenversicherung Braunschweig-Hannover) and a health insurance fund (Kaufmännische Krankenkasse), in collaboration with the Physician's Association of Lower Saxony, entered a contract for integrated health care in rheumatology in Lower Saxony. The agreement aims at patients with early arthritis or spondyloarthritis. Through close collaboration between primary health care physicians and rheumatologists, the diagnosis of arthritis or spondyloarthritis should be made soon after disease manifestation and an adequate therapy initiated. The article describes the background and contents of the contract.

Costs in rheumatology: results and lessons learned from the 'Hannover Costing Study'.

The objective of this study is to review the concept of the 'Hannover Costing Study' and to present and discuss the major insights generated during the course of the project. The costing study was performed in conjunction with a randomized controlled prospective trial assessing the effectiveness of a disease management module in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A full set of clinical and cost data both from patient-reported and payer-derived cost data was developed. In particular the study included (1) the development of a matrix of cost domains which might be used as a common taxonomy in costing studies, (2) the descriptive analysis of payer derived cost data, (3) the analysis of cost data in patients with uncertain diagnosis; (4) the development and validation of a patient-reported costing instrument, and (5) an assessment of productivity costs. The following are the results (1) the developed matrix of cost domains included 16 separate cost domains: 7 outpatient, 3 inpatient, 4 other disease related, and 2 productivity domains; (2) the micro-costing analysis showed total direct costs of 3,815 per patient-year (standard error of mean, SEM: 267) and RA-related direct costs were 2,312 per patient-year; (3) in patients with uncertain diagnosis of RA and no treatment with 'Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs' (DMARD) costs were significantly lower; (4) the comparison of patient-reported with payer-reported cost data generally supports the use of highly aggregated items to assess health care utilization in RA; (5) productivity costs in patients that are gainfully employed and in patients who receive RA-related retirement payments exceed RA-related direct costs. Furthermore, RA-patients reported their productivity losses adequately. The study added some additional insights to the following questions: What costs should be collected, what level of detail is required for that task, what patients should by analyzed, and what data sources should be used in further studies in RA.

[The multimodal rheumatologic complex treatment (OPS 8-983)--challenges, solutions and perspectives]. / Die multimodale rheumatologische Komplexbehandlung (OPS 8-983) Herausforderungen, Lösungen und Perspektiven.

As from 2005 the specialized complex rheumatologic treatment can be assigned to the code category 8-983 (Multimodale rheumatologische Komplexbehandlung) of the OPS procedure classification system. Only by means of this specific procedure code, has an appropriate description and consideration in the G-DRG system of the common clinical practice in specialized rheumatologic hospitals/clinics become possible. The complex and multimodal treatment reflects the rheumatologic therapeutic standard for the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases and non-inflammatory pain syndromes. The article focuses on the minimal criteria that have to be met for coding the OPS 8-983. Helpful practical instructions are given concerning how to implement the complex procedure into practice. Even though the newly introduced procedure code OPS 8-983 will not yet develop influence on the grouping process in 2005, other changes in the GDRG system lead to an improved economic valuation of rheumatological services in comparison to 2004.

Direct costs related to rheumatoid arthritis: the patient perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To determine rheumatoid arthritis related out of pocket expenditure (OOPE) in Germany and to disaggregate the total OOPE into contributing cost domains. METHODS: Data for the cost analysis were drawn from a multicentre randomised controlled prospective trial to assess the effectiveness of clinical quality management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Both payer sources and patient cost questionnaires were used to generate health care utilisation data. All cost domains of a recently published matrix were reviewed and potential sources of OOPE were determined. Health care utilisation data were developed throughout 2001. Co-payment regulations as per January 2004 were applied in order to indicate the most recent level of OOPE in Germany. Data were analysed in both physical and monetary units using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In all, 136 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were included. Mean total OOPE per patient and year was 417.20 Euro (SEM 38.8, median 271.2). OOPE accounted for 15.3% of the total direct costs of rheumatoid arthritis. Total OOPE were further subdivided into cost domains: "non-physician service utilisation"' (194.40 Euro per patient and year; SEM 24.2), "medication" (99.00 Euro; 6.1), "transportation" (56.20 Euro; 17.4), "visits to physicians" (38.40 Euro; 0.6), "hospital facilities" (24.00 Euro; 5.6), and "devices and aids" (5.10 Euro; 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with substantial OOPE, imposing a considerable economic burden for patients. OOPE contribute significantly to the total health care expenditure in rheumatoid arthritis. The patient perspective has to be taken into account when calculating the overall direct costs of rheumatoid arthritis from a societal point of view.

[Changes for rheumatology in the G-DRG system 2005]. / Veränderungen für die Rheumatologie im G-DRG-System 2005.

The German prospective payment system G-DRG has been recently adapted and recalculated. Apart from the adjustments of the G-DRG classification system itself changes in the legal framework like the extension of the "convergence period" or the limitation of budget loss due to DRG introduction have to be considered. Especially the introduction of new procedure codes (OPS) describing the specialized and complex rheumatologic treatment of inpatients might be of significant importance. Even though these procedures will not yet develop influence on the grouping process in 2005, it will enable a more accurate description of the efforts of acute-rheumatologic treatment which can be used for further adaptations of the DRG algorithm. Numerous newly introduced additive payment components (ZE) result in a more adequate description of the "DRG-products". Although not increasing the individual hospital budget, these additive payments contribute to more transparency of high cost services and can be addressed separately from the DRG-budget. Furthermore a lot of other relevant changes to the G-DRG catalogue, the classification systems ICD-10-GM and OPS-301 and the German Coding Standards (DKR) are presented.

[Conceptual and methodological basics of cost assessments in rheumatology]. / Konzeptionelle und methodische Grundlagen von Krankheitskostenerhebungen in der Rheumatologie.

Cost-of-illness studies in rheumatic conditions show an enormous variability in reported costs. Reasons are-among others-a lack of standardization with regards to relevant cost domains and the utilization of various insufficiently validated costing sources. A flow scheme is presented which may serve as a systematic basis for a valid costing analysis. The scheme includes: i) Selection of relevant cost domains. A comprehensive matrix of cost domains may be used as a framework. According to the specific aims of any costing study individual domains might be selected. ii) An adequate level of detail has to be determined taking into account factors such as the validity of the data collection and the feasibility. iii) Appropriate objective (i. e. usage of administrative data) or subjective (i. e. patient-derived) data sources have to be identified under consideration of respective strengths and weaknesses. While administrative sources provide a valid access to costing data accessibility and feasibility are important advantages of patient-derived costing procedures. iv) During data collection the potential bias due to protocol-driven costs and the differentiation of disease-related from other health care costs should be considered. v) The data analysis should support a transparent presentation of the costing data both in physical and monetary units. In summary, no 'gold standard' has been established for costing studies yet. However, valid costing approaches might follow the flow scheme presented in this analysis.

[Rheumatologic treatment in the G-DRG system]. / Rheumatologie im G-DRG-Fallpauschalensystem.

On June 27 2000, the German Self-Administration and lately the German Ministry of Health set the general conditions for a new reimbursement system for the inpatient hospital sector which is based nearly exclusively on lump-sum payments. The Association of Acute Rheumatology Hospitals (VRA) and the DRG-Research-Group, Münster University Hospital, conducted a multi-center trial which included 7266 cases from 22 different hospitals. The data were used to analyze how well the not yet German healthcare adjusted G-DRG system (version 1.0) accounts for rheumatologic diagnostics and treatment as well as problems of specialized hospitals. 7 Adjacent-DRGs covered 91% of all cases, 68% of all cases were grouped into only two different Adjacent-DRGs (169 Bone Diseases and Specific Arthropathies and 166 Other Connective Tissue Disorders). Groups with different complexity which are not appropriately covered by the existing G-DRG system could be identified. The data further revealed a systematically longer length of stay in rheumatology clinics opposed to the average length of stay in the data used for calculating the G-DRGs, due to different structures and procedures of the complex rheumatologic treatment. The results strongly supported the assumption that an accurate reimbursement of rheumatologic cases in the current G-DRG system 1.0 would not have been possible. Adaptations made in the new G-DRG Version 2004 can only partly solve these problems, despite an improved construction of the DRGs. In order to guarantee an appropriate reimbursement of rheumatology clinics from 2005 on, the G-DRG system must be adapted to specific rheumatological pathways and/or alternative or additional reimbursement systems have to be found.

Costs of rheumatoid arthritis in Germany: a micro-costing approach based on healthcare payer's data sources.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a systematic set of German cost data in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based solely on valid healthcare payer's cost data sources. METHODS: Retrospectively one year cost data of 338 patients with RA were generated and analysed. The cost data were derived from a major statutory health insurance plan ("Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Niedersachsen") and the regional physicians' association ("Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Niedersachsen"). The recently published matrix of cost domains in RA was applied to structure the analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: The total direct costs for the 338 patients during one year (third quarter 2000 to second quarter 2001) were euro 3815 per patient-year. RA related direct costs were euro 2312 per patient-year. Outpatient costs accounted for 73.7%, inpatient costs for 24.0%, and other disease related costs for 2.3% of RA related direct costs. Outpatients cost drivers were RA related drugs (euro 1019 per patient-year), physician visits (euro 323 per patient-year), diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and tests (euro 185 per patient-year), and devices and aids (euro;168 per patient-year). 98 patients were retired prematurely owing to RA related work disability and incurred costs of euro;8358 per retired patient-year. 96 patients were gainfully employed and incurred sick leave costs of euro 2835 per employed patient-year. CONCLUSION: Micro-costing based on healthcare payer's data provides a relatively conservative albeit highly accurate estimate of costs in RA. Both RA related and non-RA related costs must be taken into account. In gainfully employed patients and in patients who receive RA related retirement payments productivity costs exceed direct costs.

Early arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in Germany.

Early arthritis is challenging because the clinical picture often does not allow a distinction between rheumatoid arthritis (RA), self-limiting disease, and other forms of inflammatory arthritis. In Germany the first early synovitis clinic and several inception cohorts of patients with early RA were initiated and evaluated during the 1980s and 1990s to learn more about diagnostic classification, psycho-social problems and socio-economical status including sick-leave, work loss, and indirect costs of patients with early arthritis and early RA. Unclassified arthritis was described as the most frequent diagnosis and the term "undifferentiated arthritis" was chosen to underline the heterogeneity of theses arthritides and the preliminary state of this classification as a working diagnosis. A large National Databank of the German Regional Collaborative Arthritis Centres has been established over the last 10 years. In total, there are some 170,000 cases in the database. Moreover, a prospective multicentre inception cohort of early RA of less than 1 year's disease duration has been started recently to evaluate parameters of potential relevance for the pathogenesis of RA and eventually for the prediction of erosive disease. Studies are in progress to test the diagnostic performance of specific antibodies and antibody patterns for RA. Another topic of research addresses the identification of bacterial DNA in synovial fluid and synovial tissues to improve the differentiation of patients with reactive arthritis from those with early RA and to narrow the working diagnosis of undifferentiated arthritis.

Lessons from an international survey of paper cases of 10 real patients from an early arthritis clinic. CRI (Club Rhumatismes et Inflammation) Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how experts would classify 10 early-arthritis cases (7 atypical) and to study discrepancies in diagnoses relative to ACR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or ESSG criteria for spondyloarthropathy (SpA). METHODS: Ten real cases (5 met ACR criteria for RA, 6 ESSG criteria for SpA, 3 both and 2 neither) followed for 28.5 +/- 4.8 months were sent as paper cases to 20 international and 12 French experts. Each expert selected a diagnosis among 8 possible choices and rated it on a 0-10 confidence scale. For each case, 3 analog scales (0-100 mm) were used to indicate the probability of RA, SpA or undifferentiated arthritis (UA). RESULTS: Experts often disagreed about diagnoses (up to 5 different diagnoses for a given case, with a mean of 3.9 per case). Similarly, expert opinions on probabilities for RA and SpA differed widely, with great overlap between confidence for RA, SpA and UA. Fulfilment of ACR or ESSG criteria was poorly related to the experts' diagnosis and evaluation of probabilities for RA and SpA. However, UA was a relatively infrequent choice (19%). CONCLUSIONS: There was no general consensus about the nosology of early RA and SpA. Classification of atypical early arthritis was not resolved by currently available criteria for RA and SpA. This may have implications for therapy in early disease.

[Cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) selective inhibitors: socioeconomic and pharmaco-epidemiologic aspects]. / Cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) selektive Inhibitoren: sozioökonomische und pharmakoepidemiologische Aspekte.

Health authorities of several European countries recently introduced guidelines for socioeconomic evaluations. Additionally the activities of OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials) indicate an increasing awareness for the need of socioeconomic studies in rheumatology. The planned 2000 OMERACT meeting in Toulouse will address transfer of socioeconomic standards into rheumatology. In terms of cost effectiveness of selective Cox-2 inhibitors, a reference has to be made to the preceding discussion of cost effectiveness of Misoprostol. In addition, there are two models examining the cost effectiveness of Cox-2 inhibitors: a Canadian model comparing Nabumetone and Naproxen and an unpublished model assessing the cost effectiveness of Celecoxib (ACCES: Arthritis Cost Consequence Evaluation System). German data indicate that gastrointestinal bleedings account for 32.9% of all adverse drug events leading to a hospital admission. Further data assessing the morbidity due to adverse effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are needed. Such data would allow the quantification of possible savings related to the usage of Cox-2 inhibitors in Germany.

Evaluation of costs in rheumatic diseases: a literature review.

The aim of our review was to examine recently published cost-evaluations presenting originally developed data in rheumatic conditions. We identified 21 articles: 9 presenting original data on rheumatoid arthritis and/or osteoarthritis; 7 focusing on other musculoskeletal conditions such as back pain, scleroderma, Lyme disease, and fibromyalgia; and 5 assessing costs in total knee and hip arthroplasty. Most of the studies originated in the United States. In contrast to earlier reviews in this journal, fewer studies focused on only pharmacoeconomic aspects. In reviewing these studies, we found a lack of standardization in cost-assessment leading to a limited comparability of study results. As main tasks to improve the evidence achieved by performing cost-evaluations in clinical settings, we identified a standardization of main cost-components that should be covered by each clinical trial and the assessment of validity, reliability, and comparability of different data sources used to collect cost-data.

Diagnostic evaluation of classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and reactive arthritis in an early synovitis outpatient clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and reactive arthritis (ReA) in an early synovitis outpatient clinic. METHODS: In a prospective two year survey consecutive patients with early synovitis of less than one year duration were documented using a standardised registry and were classified after an expert diagnosis. Of a total of 320 patients 39 (19%) were diagnosed as having RA, 24 (11%) patients had ReA, 117 (54%) patients did not have an unequivocal diagnosis, and were considered as undifferentiated arthritis. RESULTS: The retrospective application of the revised 1987 ACR criteria for the classification of RA in this data set revealed a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 90%. The positive predictive value was 0.67, the negative predictive value 0.98. Similarly, the criteria for ReA of the French Society of Rheumatology (FSR) showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 90% with a positive predictive value of 0.55 and a negative predictive value of 0.97. Both criteria sets had a satisfying likelihood ratio of 9 and 10, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both the 1987 ACR criteria for RA and the criteria of the FSR for ReA have a reasonable diagnostic validity in patients with early synovitis, including a large portion of undifferentiated arthritis.