Norepinephrine transporter and catecholamine-O-methyltransferase gene variants and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in adults.

Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a complex, highly heritable psychiatric condition. Neuropsychological and pharmacological studies suggest a dysregulation of central noradrenergic neurotransmission in addition to dopaminergic and serotonergic mechanisms. Only a few studies have focused on the association of noradrenergic susceptibility genes with ADHD. In this study, we investigated the association of several ADHD symptom scores (German short form of the Wender Utah Rating Scale, WURS-k; ADHD self report, ADHD-SB, and the German validated version of the WRAADDS, WRI) with haplotypes of the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and the norepinephrine transporter (SLC6A2) genes. Subjects were genotyped for three SLC6A2 (rs5569, rs998424, rs2242447) and two COMT single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs4680, rs4818). In addition, psychosocial adversity in childhood was assessed in order to evaluate putative gene-environment interactions. We did not find main effects of the COMT and SLC6A2 NET1 gene haplotypes on any ADHD symptom severity score. Childhood psychosocial adversity was strongly associated with number of ADHD symptoms. No gene-environment interaction was found. A specific combination of two COMT and SLC6A2 gene haplotypes, containing the low functioning COMT variant was nominally associated with low ADHD scores in all scales. Results do not support the hypothesis that common variants in the SLC6A2 and COMT genes in particular are associated with ADHD, but might give some evidence for interactive effects between these gene variants on ADHD severity.

[Proteomics: biomarker research in psychiatry]. / Proteomics--Biomarkerforschung in der Psychiatrie.

Over the last decade, genomics research in psychiatry and neuroscience has provided important insights into genes expressed under different physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Contrary to the great expectations regarding a clinical use of these datasets, genomics failed to improve markedly the diagnostic and therapeutic options in brain disorders. Due to alternative splicing and posttranslational modifications, one single gene determines a multitude of gene products. Therefore, in order to understand molecular processes in neuropsychiatric disorders, it is necessary to unravel signal transduction pathways and complex interaction networks on the level of proteins, not only DNA and mRNA. Proteomics utilises high-throughput mass spectrometric protein identification that can reveal protein expression levels, posttranslational modifications and protein-protein interactions. Proteomic tools have the power to identify quantitative and qualitative protein patterns in postmortem brain tissue, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or serum, thus increasing the knowledge about etiology and pathomechanisms of brain diseases. Comparing protein profiles in healthy and disease states provides an opportunity to establish specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. In addition, proteomic studies of the effects of medication - in vitro and in vivo - might help to design specific pharmaceutical agents with fewer side effects. In this overview, we present the most widely used proteomic techniques and illustrate the potential and limitations of this field of research. Furthermore, we provide insight into the contributions of proteomics to the study of psychiatric diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, drug addiction, schizophrenia and depression.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of quetiapine in adolescents with psychotic disorders.

INTRODUCTION: There are developmental and age-dependent differences in the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of drugs in children and adolescents. Therefore, there is a need to carry out standardised studies to find out therapeutic ranges of plasma/serum concentrations in psychopharmacotherapy of children and adolescents. The aim of this prospective study was to examine the relationship between quetiapine serum concentration, treatment response, and side effects in a clinical setting to elucidate the age-specific therapeutic range of quetiapine in adolescents. METHODS: Over a period of two years, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was routinely performed in 21 adolescents (mean age was 15.9+/-1.5 years, 57% male) with psychotic disorders according to the guidelines of the AGNP TDM expert group. The psychopathology was assessed by using the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Side effects were assessed by using the Dose Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (DOTES). Trough quetiapine concentrations were determined under steady state conditions after multiple-dose regimes (median 600 mg/day; range 100-800 mg/day). RESULTS: There was a marked variability of the serum concentrations, ranging from 19-877 ng/ml. 40.8% of the determined values were below and 24.5% above the therapeutic range (70-170 ng/ml) recommended for adults. None of the patients had severe side effects. We found a weak correlation between dose and serum concentration of quetiapine and no relationship between serum concentration and treatment response. DISCUSSION: There are several limitations of this study, and our results should therefore be interpreted with caution. Notwithstanding, differences in the ontogenesis of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may be the reason for the difference in the relationship between blood concentrations and therapeutic response to psychopharmaca in children, adolescents and adults. Further studies using larger samples, baseline assessment of psychopathology, definition of the treatment interval and investigation of clinically relevant interactions with various co-medications are warranted to improve the limitations of this pilot study.

Allelic variation in serotonin transporter function associated with the intensity dependence of the auditory evoked potential.

The intensity dependence of the auditory evoked potential (AEP) has been suggested as an indicator of central serotonergic function, a strong intensity dependence presumably reflecting low serotonergic activity. As individual differences in serotonergic neurotransmission can be accounted for in part by genetic variation in genes of the serotonergic pathway, we investigated whether a functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR) is associated with the AEP intensity dependence. Because dopaminergic influences on the intensity dependence have also been reported, we furthermore explored the role of a functional polymorphism in the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4 exon III) in the modulation of the AEP intensity dependence. AEPs to tones of six intensity levels were recorded from 60 healthy young individuals, and N1/P2 linear as well as median slopes at central electrode sites were computed as measures of the AEP intensity dependence. Analyses of variance showed that there was a significant effect of the 5-HTTLPR on the AEP intensity dependence. Individuals with the ll genotype exhibited a stronger intensity dependence compared to individuals with the ls genotype. This effect was even more pronounced when DRD4 exon III was considered in the analyses. In conclusion, these findings provide further evidence for a role of serotonergic neurotransmission in the modulation of the AEP intensity dependence. The results also point to possible dopaminergic influences on the AEP intensity dependence.