Tiotropium Handihaler and the risk of cardio- or cerebrovascular events and mortality in patients with COPD.

BACKGROUND: Tiotropium has been associated with an increased risk of mortality and/or cardiovascular events. Recent data from RCTs suggests tiotropium Handihaler to be safe, but its safety has not yet been fully investigated under real-life circumstances. METHODS: We conducted 2 nested case-control studies in a COPD cohort from the Dutch IPCI database. In the first case-control study, cases had a cardiovascular or cerebrovascular endpoint (CCVE): stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction, heart failure and/or ventricular arrhythmia. In the second, cases were all patients who died. Cases were matched to controls on age, sex and index date. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR(adj)) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for tiotropium vs. long-acting beta-agonists (LABA). RESULTS: Within a cohort of 6788 COPD patients, 784 CCVE's and 1032 deaths were reported. Compared to current LABA use, use of tiotropium Handihaler was neither associated with an increased risk of a CCVE (OR(adj) 0.89, 95% 0.55-1.44) nor with an increased risk of death (OR(adj) 0.79, 95% CI 0.49-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: In real life, use of tiotropium Handihaler in COPD patients is not associated with an increased risk of a CCVE or mortality compared to LABA.

Duration of antihypertensive drug use and risk of dementia: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The evidence from prospective observational research for a protective effect of antihypertensive drug use on the risk of dementia is far from uniform. Duration of follow-up was limited and relied mainly on baseline drug exposure data without information on duration of use. We investigated the association between the duration of antihypertensive use and risk of dementia. METHODS: We followed 6,249 participants (mean 68.4 years, 60% women) of a prospective, population-based cohort from baseline (1990-1993) until 2005 for incident dementia. Continuous data on filled prescriptions came from pharmacy records. Total cumulative duration of antihypertensive use was expressed in years. We subtracted a latent 4-year period before the date of dementia diagnosis in the quantification of exposure duration to avoid potential bias in antihypertensive prescription due to prodromal changes in blood pressure or cognition. With Cox regression models, we calculated crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of all dementia and Alzheimer disease (AD) with antihypertensive use vs never used. RESULTS: Compared to never used, antihypertensive use was associated with a reduced risk of all dementia (adjusted HR per year of use 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-0.99). We observed an 8% (95% CI -15% to -1%) risk reduction per year of use for persons < or =75 years, whereas for persons >75 years this was 4% (95% CI -11% to 4%). Equivalent estimates were observed for AD. No apparent differences were observed among different types of antihypertensive drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive drug use was associated with 8% risk reduction of dementia per year of use for persons < or =75 years.

Statins are associated with a reduced risk of Alzheimer disease regardless of lipophilicity. The Rotterdam Study.

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional reports suggest that statin users are less likely to have Alzheimer disease (AD). Prospective studies have provided inconsistent evidence. Moreover, it is unclear whether the association differs for lipophilic statins, those that could more easily pass the blood-brain barrier and hydrophilic statins. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate whether use of statins is associated with the risk of AD, and to determine whether associations differ for lipophilic and hydrophilic statins. METHOD: 6992 participants of the prospective, population-based Rotterdam Study were followed, from baseline (1990-1993) until January 2005 for incident AD. Data on all filled prescriptions came from pharmacy records. For each date on which each event occurred, cholesterol-lowering drug use for the person who experienced the event and all remaining persons in the cohort was categorised as "any" or "never" use. A distinction was made between statin, lipophilic and hydrophilic statins, and non-statin cholesterol-lowering drugs. Data were analysed with the Cox regression analysis, adjusting for sex, age and potential confounders. RESULTS: During follow-up (mean 9 years), 582 persons developed AD. Compared with never use of cholesterol-lowering drugs, statin use was associated with a decreased risk of AD (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.90), but non-statin cholesterol-lowering drug use was not (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.45 to 2.44). HRs were equal for lipophilic (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.89) and hydrophilic statins (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.11). CONCLUSION: In the general population, the use of statins, but not of non-statin cholesterol-lowering drugs, was associated with a lower risk of AD compared with never use of cholesterol-lowering drugs. The protective effect was independent of the lipophilicity of statins.

A study to examine the accuracy of potassium measurements in clinical laboratories across Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of potassium measurements in clinical laboratories across Canada. DESIGN AND METHOD: The flame atomic emission spectrophotometry reference method for the determination of potassium was established at the Canadian Reference Laboratory by using National Institute of Science and Technology standard reference materials. The method was subsequently used to assign target values for potassium to Canadian Reference Laboratory's External Quality Assessment human-serum-based testing material. A total of 503 laboratories participated and 9,279 individual External Quality Assessment test results were included in the study. Bias was determined by using difference plots. RESULTS: Clinically significant bias (>1.6%) was observed in 45.9% of the laboratories. Bias ranged from 0.34 mmol/L to -0.54 mmol/L. At low concentrations (<3.5 mmol/L) a positive bias was most frequently observed (14.7% of analytical systems). At high potassium concentrations (>5.1 mmol/L) a negative bias was most frequently observed (31.4% of analytical systems). CONCLUSION: Inaccuracy in potassium results can contribute to test redundancy and mismanagement of patients, while prohibiting the merger of laboratory data from disparate testing sites for the purpose of trending and consolidation within a "universal health record." Inaccurate test results and the lack of standardization among laboratories adversely impact our ability to establish common reference intervals and critical limits. This inability has an adverse effect on medical decisions and patient care.