Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Am J Ind Med ; 67(3): 261-273, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38273456

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To determine if construction and trades workers formerly employed at US Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear weapons sites are at significant risk for occupational diseases, we studied the mortality experience of participants in the Building Trades National Medical Screening Program (BTMed). METHODS: The cohort included 26,922 participants enrolled between 1998 and 2021 and 8367 deaths. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated based on US death rates. Cox models compared construction workers (n = 22,747; 7487 deaths) to two nonconstruction subpopulations: administrative, scientific and security workers (n = 1894; 330 deaths), and all other nonconstruction workers (n = 2218; 550 deaths). RESULTS: Mortality was elevated for all causes, all cancers, cancers of the trachea, bronchus, lung, kidneys, and lymphatic and hematopoietic system, mesothelioma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asbestosis, transportation injuries, and other injuries, particularly accidental poisonings. There were 167 deaths from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which was lower than expected using US death rates. Overall cause-specific mortality was significantly higher among construction workers than for internal comparison groups. CONCLUSIONS: Construction workers employed at DOE sites have a significantly increased risk for occupational illnesses. Apart from COVID-19 deaths, this update: (1) found that mortality among construction workers is significantly elevated compared to the US population and significantly higher than in the internal comparison populations, and (2) confirmed excess risk for these workers for first employment after 1990. Cancer mortality risks are similar to the cancers identified for DOE compensation from radiation exposures. The high lung cancer risk supports the value of early lung cancer detection. Continued medical surveillance is important.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Indústria da Construção , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Seguimentos , Pulmão , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 65(8): 644-651, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35726605

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Few studies have defined the risk of hearing impairment and tinnitus after retirement. This report measures hearing impairment and tinnitus prevalence among older construction trades workers. METHODS: The study cohort included 21,340 participants in a national medical screening program (www.btmed.org). Audiometric hearing impairment was classified according to the Global Burden of Disease Study. Tinnitus was determined by self-report. An internal subcohort of nonconstruction trades workers served as a reference group. Stratified analyses and multivariate analyses were used to measure the prevalence of hearing impairment and tinnitus by age, sex, and job category. RESULTS: Prevalence of any hearing impairment was 55.2% (males, 57.7%; females, 26.8%) and increased rapidly with age. Construction trades workers were 40% more likely to have hearing impairment than the reference group. The overall prevalence of tinnitus was 46.52% and followed patterns similar to hearing impairment. Workers with hearing impairment were more likely to also have tinnitus, but tinnitus was frequently reported in the absence of measured hearing impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing impairment and tinnitus prevalence were much higher in this study than in previous research. A significant reason for the difference is that BTMed follows participants after they have retired. To draw conclusions about the risk for work-related chronic diseases and disorders it is important to monitor workers through their lifetimes. Also, tinnitus by itself should be given greater significance. These findings reinforce the need to promote noise reduction and hearing conservation in construction.


Assuntos
Indústria da Construção , Perda Auditiva , Zumbido , Audiometria , Feminino , Perda Auditiva/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Autorrelato , Zumbido/diagnóstico , Zumbido/epidemiologia , Zumbido/etiologia
3.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(6): 462-475, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33728649

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A 2010 study of construction workers participating in medical screening programs at the Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities demonstrated increased chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) risk. The current study of a larger worker cohort allowed for a more nuanced analysis of COPD risk, including for employment beginning after the mid-1990s. METHODS: Study participants included 17,941 workers with demographic and smoking data and spirometry with a minimum of three recorded expiratory efforts and reproducibility of forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) of 0.2 L or less. COPD was defined as a FEV1 /FVC ratio below the lower limit of normal using established prediction equations without use of bronchodilation. Stratified analyses explored COPD prevalence by demographic variables and trade. Logistic regression analyses assessed risks by trade and time periods of trade and DOE site work, controlling for age, gender, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and smoking. RESULTS: Overall COPD prevalence was 13.4% and 67.4% of cases were classified as moderate to severe. Compared to nonconstruction workers, construction trade workers were at significantly increased risk of all COPD (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.29-1.79) and even more so for severe COPD (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.32-1.96). The highest risk trades were cement masons/bricklayers (OR = 2.36; 95% CI = 1.71-3.26) and roofers (OR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.48-3.32). Risk among workers employed after 1995 was elevated but not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Construction workers are at increased COPD risk. Results support the prevention of both smoking and occupational exposures to reduce these risks. While the number of participants employed after 1995 was small, patterns of risk were consistent with findings in the overall cohort.


Assuntos
Indústria da Construção/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Testes de Função Respiratória , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Espirometria , Capacidade Vital
4.
Am J Ind Med ; 62(9): 742-754, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31380577

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To determine if construction and trades workers employed at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear sites facilities are at significant risk for diseases associated with occupational exposures, we compared the mortality experience of participants in the Building Trades National Medical Screening Program (BTMed) to that of the US population. METHODS: The cohort includes 24,086 BTMed participants enrolled between 1998 and 2016 and 5203 deaths. Cause-specific standardized mortality ratios were calculated based on US death rates. RESULTS: Mortality was elevated for all causes, all cancers, cancers of the trachea, bronchus, and lung and lymphatic and hematopoietic system, mesothelioma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asbestosis, transportation injuries, and other injuries, particularly those caused by accidental poisoning, suggesting a possible effect of the opioid epidemic. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from other injuries, mortality patterns were very similar to those reported in the past in this population. Construction workers employed at DOE sites have a significantly increased risk for occupational illnesses. Risks are associated with employment during all time periods covered including possibly after 1990. The cancer risks closely match the cancers identified for DOE compensation from radiation exposures. The high risk of lung cancer supports the value of early lung cancer detection. Continued medical surveillance is important.


Assuntos
Indústria da Construção/estatística & dados numéricos , Centrais Nucleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Profissionais/mortalidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Lesões por Radiação/mortalidade , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Centrais Nucleares/organização & administração , Vigilância da População , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Government Agencies/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(10): 1083-97, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26123003

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While smoking is the major cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), occupational exposures to vapors, gases, dusts, and fumes (VGDF) increase COPD risk. This case-control study estimated the risk of COPD attributable to occupational exposures among construction workers. METHODS: The study population included 834 cases and 1243 controls participating in a national medical screening program for older construction workers between 1997 and 2013. Qualitative exposure indices were developed based on lifetime work and exposure histories. RESULTS: Approximately 18% (95% CI = 2-24%) of COPD risk can be attributed to construction-related exposures, which are additive to the risk contributed by smoking. A measure of all VGDF exposures combined was a strong predictor of COPD risk. CONCLUSIONS: Construction workers are at increased risk of COPD as a result of broad and complex effects of many exposures acting independently or interactively. Control methods should be implemented to prevent worker exposures, and smoking cessation should be promoted.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/efeitos adversos , Indústria da Construção , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(2): 152-67, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25603938

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Building Trades National Medical Screening Program (BTMed) was established in 1996 to provide occupational medicine screening examinations for construction workers who have worked at US Department of Energy nuclear sites. Workers participating in BTMed between 1998 and 2011 were followed to determine their vital status and mortality experience through December 31, 2011. METHODS: The cohort includes 18,803 BTMed participants and 2,801 deaths. Cause-specific Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMRs) were calculated based on US death rates. RESULTS: Mortality was elevated for all causes, all cancers, cancers of the trachea, bronchus, and lung and lymphatic and hematopoietic system, mesothelioma, COPD, and asbestosis. CONCLUSIONS: Construction workers employed at DOE sites have a significantly increased risk for occupational illnesses. Risks are associated with employment during all time periods covered including after 1980. The cancer risks closely match the cancers identified for DOE compensation from radiation exposures. Continued medical surveillance is important.


Assuntos
Indústria da Construção/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Centrais Nucleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Profissionais/mortalidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Causas de Morte , Emprego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Lesões por Radiação/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Government Agencies/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Fam Med ; 38(5): 349-54, 2006 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16673197

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies have suggested that antibiotics are often inappropriately used in the treatment of acute upper respiratory tract infections (URIs). This study examined antibiotic use for adult URIs in a large national network of offices that use electronic health records (EHRs). METHODS: Using the Medical Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) database, URI episodes were identified for patients ages 18 to 65 years from January 1, 1998, to March 31, 2003. The percentage of episodes for which antibiotics were prescribed and the proportion of antibiotics that were broad spectrum were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 52,135 URI episodes identified, 65% received antibiotics. Antibiotics were prescribed for 78% of acute bronchitis episodes, 65% of acute pharyngitis episodes, 81% of acute sinusitis episodes, and 33% of nonspecific URI episodes. The proportion of antibiotics that were broad spectrum was 56% for all URI episodes, 68% for acute bronchitis, 55% for acute sinusitis and nonspecific URI, and 40% for pharyngitis. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates overuse of antibiotics for adult URIs in a large national ambulatory care network, with particular overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The study also illustrates the enormous potential of EHR data for conducting practice-based research across large national office networks.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Feminino , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Masculino , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
8.
Biotechnol Healthc ; 2(2): 48-53, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23393451

RESUMO

Transferring discoveries and innovations from academia to the business sector can be a tricky yet profitable business that serves the public good. Where does the funding come from, where is it going, and what sorts of issues threaten relations between universities and private industry?

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...