Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Prostate ; 39(4): 316-22, 1999 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10344223

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC, Rotterdam region), men aged 55-74 years are screened for prostate cancer by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) sampling, digital rectal examination (DRE), and transrectal ultrasound investigation (TRUS). All men with a PSA > or =4 ng/ml and/or a suspicious DRE and/or a suspicious TRUS are biopsied. METHODS: Logistic regression analysis was applied to derive a predictive index that equals the chance to find prostate cancer in a biopsy given the outcomes of the screening tests. This model was used to assess the number of cancers that could have been detected if all men had been biopsied (extrapolation). Furthermore, the model was used to study the possibilities for improvement of the current screening protocol. RESULTS: PSA was the dominant predictor for prostate cancer in a biopsy, followed by prostate volume, DRE, and TRUS result. It is assessed that 69% (95% CI, 52-86%) of cancers that could be identified if all men were biopsied are currently detected. Application of the same methods to screening data obtained in Göteborg (the Swedish ERSPC partner) yielded almost identical results. It was found that, in the Rotterdam protocol, a considerable number of men were biopsied according to the screening protocol with an assessed lower chance to have prostate cancer than men who were not biopsied according to the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: The chance to detect prostate cancer in a biopsy can be modeled quite accurately as a function of serum PSA, prostate volume, DRE, and TRUS results. Important improvements in the screening protocol can be achieved by the application of the predictive index.


Assuntos
Biópsia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Palpação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/imunologia , Reto/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia
2.
Epidemiology ; 8(1): 99-103, 1997 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9116104

RESUMO

We analyzed two databases comprising repeated semen analyses of male patients visiting a fertility clinic in the Netherlands to assess intra- and interindividual variability for several semen parameters. We calculated reliability coefficients to estimate the attenuation of the slope if semen parameters are used to predict the probability of conception in regression models. Reliability was lowest for morphology (Population A: R = 0.48, Population B: R = 0.54), but somewhat better for motility (Population A: R = 0.66, Population B: R = 0.71) and count (Population A: R = 0.79, Population B: R = 0.81). Semen concentration had the largest reliability coefficients (Population A: R = 0.84, Population B: R = 0.84). Stimulations using empirical variance components indicated that using semen parameters as endpoints in case-referent studies might substantially underestimate measures of association. The results showed that most semen parameters were just moderately redundant (range: Kappa = 0.28 to Kappa = 0.45); only agreement between concentration and count was substantial (Population A: Kappa = 0.84, Population B: Kappa = 0.80). Hence, epidemiologic studies focusing on male infertility should take into account a variety of parameters.


Assuntos
Infertilidade Masculina/epidemiologia , Sêmen/citologia , Análise de Variância , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/diagnóstico , Infertilidade Masculina/etiologia , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Razão de Chances , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Contagem de Espermatozoides , Motilidade dos Espermatozoides
3.
J Health Econ ; 12(1): 73-93, 1993 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10126491

RESUMO

The Dutch heart transplantation programme was subjected to a prospective economic evaluation and costs and effects with or without such programme were estimated. The no-programme estimates were derived from pretransplant patient data. Future projections of both options were based on micro-stimulation using additional data on severe heart disease prevalence and on multi-organ donation. Costs per life year gained are estimated at NLG 57,650 (quality adjusted: NLG 71,900). Sensitivity analysis showed these results to depend highly on long term incidence of costs and on quality of life after transplantation.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Transplante de Coração/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/economia , Valor da Vida , Análise Custo-Benefício , Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Transplante de Coração/mortalidade , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionais , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...