Nose-shaped mass in the ascending aorta.

A 79-year-old man was referred for urgent coronary artery bypass grafting. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed an atypically nose-shaped contrast defect, which intraoperatively turned out to be an atheromatous plaque. Its preoperative detection allowed us to prevent an adverse cerebral event. This case highlights that a thorough preoperative work-up should ideally include a CT angiography, in patients where atherosclerotic changes are to be expected.

Conduction disturbances following surgical aortic valve replacement with a rapid-deployment bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND: The implantation of rapid-deployment aortic valves may interfere with the conduction system of the heart. This study evaluates the occurrence and predictive factors of conduction anomalies in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a rapid-deployment balloon-expandable bioprosthesis in a single-center, real-world experience. METHODS: Between May 2010 and April 2019, 700 consecutive patients were included in a prospective, ongoing database with a longitudinal follow-up preoperatively, at discharge, and at 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years postoperatively. Thirty-seven patients (5.3%) had a permanent pacemaker at baseline and were excluded from further analysis, leaving 663 patients for analysis. Assessment of conduction anomalies was performed by electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring and repeated 12-lead ECG during the hospital stay and at postoperative follow-ups. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 126 patients (19.0%) presented with different conduction disturbances. New permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) occurred in 61 patients during the first 14 days (cumulative incidence, 9.4%). The indication for PPI was complete atrioventricular block in 47 cases (77%). Preoperative conduction anomalies, such as right bundle branch block, as well as operative characteristics (concomitant procedures) were found to be independent predictors for new PPI. One-year survival was 98% in patients with new early PPI and 96% in those without new early PPI (P = .60). CONCLUSIONS: The PPI rate was in the range of previous reports for rapid-deployment prostheses. PPI did not have a significant influence on short- to intermediate-term survival. Case selection with exclusion of patients presenting with baseline conduction disturbances may decrease the rate of new PPIs after SAVR with rapid-deployment balloon-expandable bioprostheses.

Awake Implementation of Extracorporeal Life Support in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.

Background and objectives: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is a widely accepted and effective strategy for use in patients presenting with refractory cardiogenic shock. Implantation in awake and non-intubated patients allows for optimized evaluation of further therapy options while avoiding potential side effects associated with the need for sedation and intubation. The aim of the study was the assessment of safety and feasibility of awake ECLS implementation and of outcomes in patients treated with this concept. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the concept of awake ECLS implantation in 16 consecutive patients (mean age 58 ± 8 years; male: 88%; ischemic cardiomyopathy: 50%) from 02/2017 to 01/2021. Study endpoints were survival to weaning or bridging to durable support or organ replacement and development of end-organ function and hemodynamic parameters on ECLS. Results: Fourteen patients (88%) were able to be successfully transitioned to definite therapy options. ECLS support stabilized end-organ function, led to a decrease in mean lactate levels (5.3 ± 3.7 mmol/L at baseline to 1.9 ± 1.3 mmol/L 12 h after ECLS start; p = 0.01) and improved hemodynamics (median central venous pressure 20 ± 5 mmHg vs. 10 ± 2 mmHg, p = 0.001) over a median duration of two days (1-8 days IQR). Two patients (13%) died on ECLS support due to multi-organ dysfunction syndrome. Survival to discharge of initially successfully bridged or weaned patients was 64%. Conclusions: Awake ECLS implantation is feasible and safe with the key advantage of omitting or delaying general anesthesia and intubation, with their associated risks in cardiogenic-shock patients, facilitating further decision making.

Anterior Right Thoracotomy for Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through anterior right thoracotomy (ART) has shown to be safe and feasible. However, acceptance within the surgical community is low. Rapid-deployment aortic valves may be a game changer due to simplified surgical technique and shorter operative times. Therefore, the combination of advanced surgical techniques like the ART access with rapid-deployment aortic valves was assessed in this study. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients undergoing ART with the Edwards Intuity Elite (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) valve system between 2011 and 2018. Patient data were collected prospectively in an ongoing, single-center registry. Data analysis regarding valve outcome was performed according to current guidelines. RESULTS: In all, 165 patients underwent aortic valve replacement through ART access with the Edwards Intuity valve system (age 73 ± 9 years, 49% female, median European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score 1.6 [range, 0.6 to 10.6]). Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 114 minutes (range, 61 to 310) and median aortic cross-clamp time was 80 minutes (range, 45 to 230). Thirty-day as well as inhospital mortality was 0.6% (n = 1). Postoperative neurologic events occurred in 3%, resulting in major neurologic deficit in 1 patient. Intermediate and long-term survival was 99%, 98%, and 93% after 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the Edwards Intuity valve system through ART is safe, feasible, and reproducible. The overall results of this single center experience are excellent compared with contemporary series of both surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacements.

Interdependence of VA-ECMO output, pulmonary congestion and outcome after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a life-saving method for patients with low-output failure after cardiac surgery. However, VA-ECMO therapy may increase left ventricular afterload due to retrograde blood flow in the aorta, which may lead to progression of pulmonary congestion. We examined the predictive value of pulmonary congestion in patients that need VA-ECMO support after cardiovascular surgery. METHODS: We enrolled a total of 266 adult patients undergoing VA-ECMO support following cardiovascular surgery at a university-affiliated tertiary care centre into our single-center registry. Pulmonary edema was assessed on bedside chest X rays at day 0, 3, 5 after VA-ECMO implantation. RESULTS: Median age was 65 (57-72) years, 69% of patients were male and 30-day survival was 63%. At ICU-admission 20% of patients had mild, 54% had moderate and 26% showed severe pulmonary congestion. Pulmonary congestion at day 0 was not associated with outcome (adjusted HR 1.31; 95%-CI 0.89-1.93;P = 0.18), whereas pulmonary congestion at day 3 (adj. HR 2.81; 95%-CI 1.76-4.46;P<0.001) and day 5 (adj. HR 3.01;95%-CI 1.84-4.93;P<0.001) was significantly associated with survival. Linear regression revealed that out of left ventricular function, cardiac output, central venous saturation, maximum dobutamine and norepinephrine dose as well as fluid balance solely ECMO rotation was associated with the evolution of pulmonary congestion (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary edema three and five days after ECMO implantation are associated with poor survival. Interestingly, a high VA-ECMO output was the most important determinant of worsening pulmonary congestion within the first five days.

Outcome of rapid deployment aortic valves: long-term experience after 700 implants.

BACKGROUND: The Edwards Intuity Valve System is a bioprosthesis with a balloon-expandable stent frame which enables rapid-deployment (RD). We aimed to analyze our single-center long-term experience with a follow-up until 9 years after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with this bioprosthesis. METHODS: Between May 2010 and May 2019, 700 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis or combined aortic valve disease, implanted with a RD valve at our institution, were included in a prospective database. Median follow-up was 19 months and the total accumulated follow-up was 2,140 patient-years. Pre-operative characteristics, operative parameters, survival rates, valve-related adverse events and valve hemodynamics were assessed. RESULTS: Mean age was 74±8 years, 45% female. Concomitant procedures were performed in 339 (48.4%) patients. In case of isolated AVR (361/700), a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach was conducted in 283 patients (78.4%). Cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times for isolated AVR were 107.7±28.2 and 73.8±21.3 minutes for MIS approaches and 92.8±28.8 and 57.5±20.6 minutes for full sternotomy (P<0.001), respectively. Mean gradients at discharge, 1, 3 and 5 years were 13±5, 11±4, 12±5 and 13±8 mmHg. New early pacemaker implantation was required in 8.9% of patients. Re-intervention or re-operation with valve explantation for structural degeneration, non-structural dysfunction or endocarditis, occurred in 21 cases (3%). Thirty-day mortality was 0.7% (5/700) and overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 98%, 91% and 76%. CONCLUSIONS: We report excellent long-term results in this updated single center experience for RD aortic valves regarding durability, safety and hemodynamic performance.

Molecular-level HLA mismatch is associated with rejection and worsened graft survival in heart transplant recipients - a retrospective study.

The aim was to evaluate the association of molecular-level human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching with post-transplant graft survival, rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). We retrospectively analyzed all primary cardiac transplant recipients between 01/1984-06/2016. 1167 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria and had HLA typing information available. In 312 donor-recipient pairs, typing at serological split antigen level was available. We used the Epitope MisMatch Algorithm to calculate the number of amino acid differences in antibody-verified HLA eplets (amino acid mismatch load (AAMM)) between donor and recipient. Patients with a higher HLA-DR AAMM load had inferior 1-year graft survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.28). The HLA-AB AAMM load showed no impact on graft survival. In the subgroup with available split-level information, we observed an inferior graft survival for a higher HLA-DR AAMM load 3 months after transplantation (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.44) and a higher risk for rejection for an increasing HLA-AB (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.29-2.24) and HLA-DR (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.09-1.61) AAMM load. No impact on the development of CAV was found. Molecular-level HLA mismatch analysis could serve as a tool for risk stratification after heart transplantation and might take us one step further into precision medicine.

Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valves for Patients With a Small Aortic Root: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement in patients with a small aortic root is a matter of concern in terms of prosthesis-patient mismatch. We evaluated the survival and hemodynamic performance after implantation of a small rapid-deployment aortic valve (EDWARDS INTUITY valve system sizes 19 and 21 mm). METHODS: Between May 2010 and November 2018, 659 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who received a rapid-deployment valve were included in a prospective and ongoing database. A small aortic bioprosthesis (sizes 19 mm and 21 mm) was implanted in 217 (32.9%) patients (mean age 74.9 ± 7.9 years, 85.3% women). Preoperative characteristics, operative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Mean gradients at discharge and 1 year were 14.8 ± 5.6 mm Hg and 13.6 ± 4.9 mm Hg, respectively. Mean effective orifice area and the indexed effective orifice area at discharge were 1.55 ± 0.36 cm2 and 0.87 ± 0.22 cm2/m2, respectively, and prosthesis-patient mismatch occurred in 77 (35.5%) patients (25.8% moderate and 9.7% severe). Perioperative mortality was 1.8% (n = 4 of 217) and overall survival at 1 year and 5 years was 91% and 79%, respectively. The presence of any prosthesis-patient mismatch degree did not have a significant influence on overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.19; P = .638). At the last follow-up, mean New York Heart Association functional class was 1.5 ± 0.7 vs 2.8 ± 0.6 at baseline (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical aortic valve replacement with rapid-deployment valves has shown improved results concerning hemodynamic performance, with decreased rates of prosthesis-patient mismatch. We observed excellent early-term and midterm survival and a significant improvement in functional class in this subgroup of patients with a small annulus.

A rare case of quadruple valve surgery with bioprosthetic pulmonary valve replacement in an octogenarian for degenerative valvular disease: Technical aspects.

Quadruple valve surgery represents a complex and rare surgical procedure, requiring a systematic and standardized approach. In this intervention, pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) in patients without pre-existing congenital heart disease represents a challenge and no large data have been reported yet. We hereby report a case of bioprosthetic PVR in an octogenarian within a quadruple valve procedure, illustrating our preferred technique of PVR with bioprosthetic implantation and right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction.

Discriminatory power of scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following cardiovascular surgery†.

OBJECTIVES: Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents a rapidly evolving treatment option in patients with refractory heart or lung failure, survival remains poor and appropriate risk stratification challenging because established risk prediction models have not been validated for this specific population. METHODS: This observational single-centre registry included a total of 240 patients treated with venoarterial ECMO therapy following cardiovascular surgery and analysed the discriminatory power of the European System of Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) additive, the EuroSCORE II, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, the SAPS III, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, the Risk of renal failure, Injury to the kidney, Failure of kidney function, Loss of kidney function and End-stage renal failure (RIFLE) classification, the survival after venoarterial ECMO (SAVE) score, the prEdictioN of Cardiogenic shock OUtcome foR AMI patients salvaGed by VA-ECMO (ENCOURAGE) score and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk model for outcome prediction. RESULTS: During a median follow-up time of 37 months (interquartile range 19-67), 65% of the patients died. Only the SAVE score and the SAPS II were significantly associated with the 30-day mortality rate with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.06 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.11; P = 0.002] for the SAVE score and an HR of 1.02 (95% CI 1.01-1.03; P = 0.004) for the SAPS II with a modest discriminatory power displayed by a C-index of 0.61 and 0.57, respectively. Seven out of 10 scoring systems revealed significant association with long-term mortality, with the SAVE score and the SAPS II remaining the strongest predictors of long-term mortality with an HR of 1.06 (95% CI 1.03-1.09; P < 0.001, C-index 0.61) for the SAVE score and an HR of 1.02 (95% CI 1.01-1.03; P < 0.001, C-index 0.58) for the SAPS II. CONCLUSIONS: Risk assessment based on established risk models in patients with ECMO remains difficult. Only the SAPS II and the SAVE score were exclusively found to be suitable for short- and long-term outcome prediction in this specific vulnerable patient population.

Excessive Pannus Overgrowth on the Aortic Side of Trifecta Valve Causing Severe Regurgitation.

Structural valve deterioration represents the most important concern regarding the implantation of a biologic heart valve in young patients. Several strategies have been proposed to improve prosthesis design in order to optimize performance and durability. This report describes an early and specific mode of valve degeneration of prostheses with outward-mounted pericardial leaflets resulting from pannus overgrowth on the aortic side. This led to leaflet retraction in two consecutive cases 4 and 6 years after the first implantation of a Trifecta valve (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN).

Awake extracorporeal life support (ECLS) implantation in profound cardiogenic shock.

Awake extracorporeal life support (ECLS) implantation is an attractive option for unstable patients for whom avoiding the risk of hemodynamic deterioration during intubation is important. In this video tutorial we show, step by step, a successful awake ECLS implantation, placing special emphasis on safeguards and potential pitfalls.

Minimally invasive approaches for implantation of left ventricular assist devices.

The era of intracorporal continuous flow pumps has initiated significant success of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery. However, median sternotomy has been the only surgical approach for implantation over many years. During the last decade, less-invasive access ways gained popularity. Within this review, we describe our own clinical experience in minimally invasive ventricular assist device (VAD) surgery and summarize the current scientific literature on this topic.

Donor heart selection and outcomes: An analysis of over 2,000 cases.

BACKGROUND: Decision-making when offered a donor heart for transplantation is complex, and supportive data describing outcomes according to acceptance or non-acceptance choices are sparse. Our aim was to analyze donor heart acceptance decisions and associated outcomes at a single center, and after subsequent acceptance elsewhere. METHODS: This investigation was a retrospective analysis of data obtained from the University of Vienna Medical Center and Eurotransplant centers for the period 2001 to 2015. RESULTS: Our center accepted 31.8% (699 of 2,199) of donor hearts offered. Unlike other centers, the acceptance rate, with or without transplantation, did not increase over time. Of the donor hearts rejected by our center, 38.1% (572 of 1,500) were later accepted elsewhere. Acceptance rates were twice as high for donor hearts initially rejected for non-quality reasons (339 of 601, 56.4%) compared with initial rejection for quality reasons (233 of 899, 25.9%). Three-year patient survival rate was 79% at Vienna; for donor hearts initially rejected by Vienna for non-quality reasons or quality reasons, it was 73% and 63%, respectively (p < 0.001). Outcomes at other centers after transplantation of grafts rejected by Vienna varied according to the reason for rejection, with good 3-year survival rates for rejection due to positive virology (77%), high catecholamines (68%), long ischemic time (71%), or low ejection fraction (68%), but poor survival was observed for hearts rejected for hypernatremia (46%), cardiac arrest (21%), or valve pathology (50%). CONCLUSIONS: A less restrictive policy for accepting donor hearts at our center, particularly regarding rejection for non-quality reasons or for positive virology, high catecholamine levels, longer ischemic time, or low ejection fraction, could expand our donor pool while maintaining good outcomes.

Mitral valve repair with adjustable ring annuloplasty.

We demonstrate the technical aspects of a novel adjustable mitral ring. This new ring was implanted in a female landrace pig, for training and educational purposes. It can be adjusted independently in the P1, P2 and P3 segments, if required, to treat  recurrent mitral regurgitation, and this is a key difference to comparable devices. The first-in-man implantation is anticipated in the near future.

Duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and survival in cardiovascular surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: The overall therapeutic goal of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with postcardiotomy shock is bridging to myocardial recovery. However, in patients with irreversible myocardial damage prolonged ECMO treatment would cause a delay or even withholding of further permanent potentially life-saving therapeutic options. We therefore assessed the prognostic effect of duration of ECMO support on survival in adult patients after cardiovascular surgery. METHODS: We enrolled into our single-center registry a total of 354 patients who underwent venoarterial ECMO support after cardiovascular surgery at a university-affiliated tertiary care center. RESULTS: Through a median follow-up period of 45 months (interquartile range, 20-81 months), 245 patients (69%) died. We observed an increase in mortality with increasing duration of ECMO support. The association between increased duration of ECMO support and mortality persisted in patients who survived ECMO support with a crude hazard ratio of 1.96 (95% confidence interval, 1.40-2.74; P < .001) for 2-year mortality compared with the third tertile and the second tertile of ECMO duration. This effect was even more pronounced after multivariate adjustment using a bootstrap-selected confounder model with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.30 (95% confidence interval, 1.52-3.48; P < .001) for 2-year long-term mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged venoarterial ECMO support is associated with poor outcome in adult patients after cardiovascular surgery. Our data suggest reevaluation of therapeutic strategies after 7 days of ECMO support because mortality disproportionally increases afterward.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

OBJECTIVES: Right ventricular (RV) failure complicating left ventricular assist device implantation is associated with increased mortality. Despite a lack of supporting evidence, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is increasingly being used as an alternative to traditional temporary RV support. We report our institutional experience with ECMO-facilitated RV support after left ventricular assist device implantation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the concept of temporary ECMO support for perioperative RV failure in 32 consecutive left ventricular assist device (mean age 52 ± 14 years; male 84.4%; ischaemic cardiomyopathy 40.6%; INTERMACS Level I 71.8%; INTERMACS Level II 6.3%; INTERMACS Level III 12.5%; INTERMACS Level IV-VII 9.4%; HeartWare ventricular assist device 75%; HeartMate II: 25%) from May 2009 to April 2014. The study end points were RV recovery during ECMO support, mortality and causes of death. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (90.6%) patients were successfully weaned from ECMO support after RV recovery. Three (9.4%) patients expired during ECMO support. ECMO support improved RV function and haemodynamic parameters (central venous pressure 13 mmHg vs 10 mmHg, P < 0.01; mean pulmonary artery pressure 28 mmHg vs 21 mmHg, P < 0.01; cardiac output 5.1 l/min vs 5.9 l/min, P = 0.09) over a median period of 3 (range 1-15) days. Thirty-day and in-hospital mortality were 18.8% and 25%, respectively. One-year survival was 75%, causes of death were multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (50%), sepsis (25%), haemorrhagic stroke (12.5%) and ischaemic stroke (12.5%). Causes of death during ECMO support were ischaemic stroke, sepsis and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary ECMO-facilitated RV support is associated with good long-term outcomes and high rates of RV recovery.

Interventional Treatment of LVAD Outflow Graft Stenosis by Introduction of Bare Metal Stents.

Left ventricular assist device outflow graft stenosis is a rare but life-threatening complication of mechanical cirulatory support therapy. Current treatment modalities (pump exchange or systemic thrombolytic therapy) are associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Implantation of bare metal stents within the stenosed outflow graft is an alternative. Herein, we describe a series of three cases with successful stent placement. This seems to be safe and successful; however, correct and early diagnosis of outflow stenosis can be challenging. Information provided by the HeartWare ventricular assist device (HVAD) logfiles is extremely helpful for diagnosis.

Increased Thromboembolic Events With Dabigatran Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device-supported patients are usually anticoagulated with a combination of aspirin and vitamin K antagonists. Long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy can be complicated by unstable international normalized ratio values and patient-related compliance problems. Therefore, direct thrombin inhibitors may represent an alternative to vitamin K antagonists. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty HeartWare ventricular assist device patients with stable renal function were planned for this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study. Patients were randomized to receive either phenprocoumon or dabigatran in addition to aspirin for long-term anticoagulation. Treatment duration was scheduled for 1 year and stopped after observation of a primary end point. Dabigatran dose was 110 and 75 mg BID in patients with normal or impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate >80 mL/min or between 80 and 30 mL/min, respectively). The study was stopped prematurely for safety reasons after 16 patients (61±8 years, 1 female) were randomized. Thromboembolic events occurred in 4 subjects receiving dabigatran (50%) and in 1 receiving phenprocoumon (13%; P=0.28). No major bleeding was recorded, and no patient died during the study. Median time to treatment termination was significantly shorter in dabigatran patients (8.5 versus 12.0 months; P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Thromboembolic events on dabigatran led to early termination of a randomized controlled trial of dabigatran versus phenprocoumon in left ventricular assist device patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02872649.