Respiratory recovery trajectories after severe-to-critical COVID-19: a 1-year prospective multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of severe-to-critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may have functional impairment, radiological sequelae and persistent symptoms requiring prolonged follow-up. This pragmatic study aimed to describe their clinical follow-up and determine their respiratory recovery trajectories, and the factors that could influence them and their health-related quality of life. METHODS: Adults hospitalised for severe-to-critical COVID-19 were evaluated at 3 months and up to 12 months post-hospital discharge in this prospective, multicentre, cohort study. RESULTS: Among 485 enrolled participants, 293 (60%) were reassessed at 6 months and 163 (35%) at 12 months; 89 (51%) and 47 (27%) of the 173 participants initially managed with standard oxygen were reassessed at 6 and 12 months, respectively. At 3 months, 34%, 70% and 56% of the participants had a restrictive lung defect, impaired diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO) and significant radiological sequelae, respectively. During extended follow-up, both D LCO and forced vital capacity percentage predicted increased by means of +4 points at 6 months and +6 points at 12 months. Sex, body mass index, chronic respiratory disease, immunosuppression, pneumonia extent or corticosteroid use during acute COVID-19 and prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) were associated with D LCO at 3 months, but not its trajectory thereafter. Among 475 (98%) patients with at least one chest computed tomography scan during follow-up, 196 (41%) had significant sequelae on their last images. CONCLUSIONS: Although pulmonary function and radiological abnormalities improved up to 1 year post-acute COVID-19, high percentages of severe-to-critical disease survivors, including a notable proportion of those managed with standard oxygen, had significant lung sequelae and residual symptoms justifying prolonged follow-up.

Forkhead Box F1 represses cell growth and inhibits COL1 and ARPC2 expression in lung fibroblasts in vitro.

Aberrant expression of master phenotype regulators or alterations in their downstream pathways in lung fibroblasts may play a central role in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Interrogating IPF fibroblast transcriptome datasets, we identified Forkhead Box F1 (FOXF1), a DNA-binding protein required for lung development, as a candidate actor in IPF. Thus we determined FOXF1 expression levels in fibroblasts cultured from normal or IPF lungs in vitro, and explored FOXF1 functions in these cells using transient and stable loss-of-function and gain-of-function models. FOXF1 mRNA and protein were expressed at higher levels in IPF fibroblasts compared with normal fibroblasts (mRNA: +44%, protein: +77%). Immunohistochemistry showed FOXF1 expression in nuclei of bronchial smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and lung fibroblasts including fibroblastic foci of IPF lungs. In normal lung fibroblasts, FOXF1 repressed cell growth and expression of collagen-1 (COL1) and actin-related protein 2/3 complex, subunit 2 (ARPC2). ARPC2 knockdown inhibited cell growth and COL1 expression, consistent with FOXF1 acting in part through ARPC2 repression. In IPF fibroblasts, COL1 and ARPC2 repression by FOXF1 was blunted, and FOXF1 did not repress growth. FOXF1 expression was induced by the antifibrotic mediator prostaglandin E2 and repressed by the profibrotic cytokine transforming growth factor-ß1 in both normal and IPF lung fibroblasts. Ex vivo, FOXF1 knockdown conferred CCL-210 lung fibroblasts the ability to implant in uninjured mouse lungs. In conclusion, FOXF1 functions and regulation were consistent with participation in antifibrotic pathways. Alterations of pathways downstream of FOXF1 may participate to fibrogenesis in IPF fibroblasts.

Bevacizumab and weekly paclitaxel for non-squamous non small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Combination of bevacizumab and weekly paclitaxel showed synergitic effects, anti-tumor efficacy and a good toxicity profile for patients with breast cancer but has never been evaluated in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively reviewed safety and efficacy of this regimen in metastatic non-squamous NSCLC as fourth-line therapy or beyond. METHODS: Patients were identified from a prospective database. Treatment consisted in paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1, every 3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included in this study. Objective response rate at first evaluation was 40% (8/20), confirmed response rate was 15% (3/20) and disease control rate was 75% (15/20). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.4 months (CI95% 4.1-9) and 9.6 months (CI95% 7-19.7). Grade 3-4 adverse events included neutropenia (4/20), onycholysis (2/20) and infection (2/20). One patient died from a bowel perforation and another one died from unknown cause. Prolonged responses were observed in a patient who had received bevacizumab as part of first-line chemotherapy and in another one who harbored an ALK rearrangement. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, combination of bevacizumab and weekly paclitaxel exhibited acceptable toxicity and had encouraging anti-tumor efficacy as fourth-line treatment or beyond for non-squamous NSCLC patients, supporting further evaluation in larger prospective studies.