High-Frequency Ultrasound for Assessment of Peri-Implant Bone Thickness.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) for measurement of bone thickness surrounding dental implants. METHODS: Eight porcine bone samples containing dental implants were scanned by a HFUS scanner and compared using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and an optical scanner. Bone thickness was measured in the buccolingual region of dental implants in 10 points distributed between the platform and apical portion of the implant. RESULTS: The mean measurement error for the ultrasound method was 0.11 mm, whereas CBCT showed a measurement error of 0.20 mm. For both devices, the maximal measurement error was 0.28 mm. CONCLUSION: Within the simulated limited conditions of this study, high-frequency ultrasound, with optical scanning used as a reference, presented higher accuracy in comparison to CBCT, and seems to be a promising tool for measuring peri-implant bone.

Assessment of Buccal Bone Surrounding Dental Implants Using a High-Frequency Ultrasound Scanner.

The purpose of this study was to determine the buccal bone dimensions surrounding dental implants using a high-frequency ultrasound (US) scanner and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Dental implants (n = 10) inserted in the maxilla of dry skulls were scanned using US (28 MHz, bandwidth 84%, aperture 6 mm, focal depth 13.2 mm) and CBCT (70 kV, 6.3 mA, voxel size 0.18 mm). The bone level and buccal bone thickness were determined on the buccal-lingual diameter of the implant. As a control group, the evaluated site was represented by a stone block containing the dental implant, and measurements were performed using an optical microscope. Statistical analysis was performed using a mixed linear regression model at a significance level of p < 0.05. There was no statistical difference among groups for the two measurements. For ultrasound, the mean discrepancy was 0.38 mm for bone thickness and 0.68 mm for bone level. For CBCT, the mean discrepancy was 0.51 mm for bone thickness and 0.09 mm for bone level. High-frequency ultrasound was able to measure buccal bone dimensions surrounding dental implants.

Accuracy of High-Frequency Ultrasound Scanner in Detecting Peri-implant Bone Defects.

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of high-frequency ultrasound (US) in the measurement of peri-implant bone defects in comparison with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and micro-computed tomography (µCT). Bone defects were mechanically created around dental implants inserted into porcine ribs (n = 10). The bone samples were scanned by CBCT, µCT and US. Linear dimensions of the peri-implant defects were determined for supra-alveolar component, intra-bony component and width. The accuracy of measurements was evaluated with repeated-measures analysis of variance and the intra-class correlation coefficient at p ≤ 0.05. US underestimated the measurements for the supra-alveolar and intra-bony components in comparison to CBCT and µCT, and there were no statistically significant differences in the measurements of width. The intra-class correlation coefficient of US ranged from 0.96 to 0.98, whereas that for CBCT ranged from 0.77 to 0.97. US was accurate in measuring the width of peri-implant defects, although vertical measurements were underestimated by approximately 1 mm in comparison to those of CBCT and µCT.

Assessment of cortical bone thickness using ultrasound.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to analyze the accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness using a combination of low- and high-frequency ultrasound (US) compared with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and using stereomicroscopy as reference method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten jawbone models were prepared using bovine ribs and porcine gingiva. A dental implant was placed in each model. All models were investigated by US, CBCT, and stereomicroscopy. The cortical bone thickness was measured directly above and 4 mm beside the implant with each method in different slices. RESULTS: The median deviation of US measurements compared to the reference method was 0.23 mm. The CBCT method was slightly more accurate (median percent deviation of 9.2%) than the US method (10.3%). However, US measurements directly above the implant were more accurate than CBCT measurements with a median percent deviation of 10.5% for US vs. 11.8% for CBCT. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound showed a high potential to supplement CBCT for measurements of the cortical bone thickness.

Soft tissue-preserving computer-aided impression: a novel concept using ultrasonic 3D-scanning.

Subgingival preparations are often affected by blood and saliva during impression taking, regardless of whether one is using compound impression techniques or intraoral digital scanning methods. The latter are currently based on optical principles and therefore also need clean and dry surfaces. In contrast, ultrasonic waves are able to non-invasively penetrate gingiva, saliva, and blood, leading to decisive advantages, as cleaning and drying of the oral cavity becomes unnecessary. In addition, the application of ultrasound may facilitate the detection of subgingival structures without invasive manipulation, thereby reducing the risk of secondary infection and treatment time, and increasing patient comfort. Ultrasound devices commonly available for medical application and for the testing of materials are only suitable to a limited extent, as their resolution, precision, and design do not fulfill the requirements for intraoral scanning. The aim of this article is to describe the development of a novel ultrasound technology that enables soft tissue-preserving digital impressions of preparations for the CAD/CAM-based production of dental prostheses. The concept and development of the high-resolution ultrasound technique and the corresponding intraoral scanning system, as well as the integration into the CAD/CAM process chain, is presented.