Screening mammography: effect of national guidelines on current physician practice.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of national breast cancer screening guidelines on current physician attitudes toward and practice of screening mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaire responses from 278 physicians were analyzed. The questionnaire had four sections: general information on physician practice and experience, current use of breast cancer screening, perceptions of screening mammography, and physician awareness of and response to the controversy in breast cancer screening. RESULTS: In women aged 40-49 years, 144 (52%) of 278 physicians performed annual clinical breast examination and screening mammography every 2 years; 57 (21%) favored annual mammography and clinical breast examination. In women aged 50 years and older, 232 (83%) physicians screened patients annually with clinical breast examination and mammography. Two hundred seventeen (78%) physicians were aware of the recommended changes in screening guidelines; 54 (19%) were not aware of the changes. Of those aware of the changes, 56 (26%) changed to the new guidelines, 150 (69%) did not change, and six (3%) modified their practice somewhat. CONCLUSION: Physician practice as regards screening mammography is influenced by national guidelines.

Physicians' opinions on the delivery of mammographic screening services: immediate interpretation versus double reading.

OBJECTIVE: Mammographic services are delivered in many ways. Emphasis has been placed on providing women with immediate reports of their screening mammograms. We believe that double reading of mammograms is more important than an immediate report. We sought to determine physicians' attitudes toward this issue and if education affects their opinions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to 1000 physicians in Massachusetts who were randomly selected from 16,000 members of the state medical society. The questionnaire had four sections, of which two were pertinent to this subject. The first section collected general information on the physician's practice and experience. The second section described two common delivery systems for mammographic screening services and asked physicians to choose the delivery system that would most benefit their patients. RESULTS: Of the 1000 physicians, 294 returned the questionnaire, giving a response rate of 29%. Of these, 16 physicians returned blank surveys, leaving 278 for analysis. Two hundred forty-nine (90%) valued off-site, delayed interpretation of mammographic screening for their patients over on-site reading by a single radiologist if an off-site, delayed reading made double reading possible. CONCLUSION: An off-site, double-reading delivery system for mammographic screening services is preferred by many physicians for their patients once they are educated as to the benefits of double reading.