Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Rev Esp Patol ; 54(1): 17-21, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33455689

RESUMO

Mesenteric arteriovenous vasculopathy (MAVD/V) is an extremely rare and poorly understood disease and its incidence is probably underestimated. It is an uncommon, non-inflammatory and non-atherosclerotic form of mesenteric vascular injury, first reported in 2016, with characteristic histopathologic evidence of fibromuscular dysplasia-like vascular changes. We present the case of a chronically ill 84-year-old female with a 5 year history of recurrent small bowel obstruction, who underwent segmental resection of the small bowel. Intraoperative examination showed bowel stricture with fibrosis, intraluminal pill fragments and creeping mesenteric adipose tissue clinically compatible with Crohn's disease. Histological examination showed acute and chronic mucosal injury characterized by crypt distortion, ulcerations with granulation tissue, pseudo-pyloric metaplasia, areas of fibrosis and serosal adhesions. Multiple blood vessels (including both veins and arteries) demonstrated wall hyalinization, elastic degeneration and non-atherosclerotic luminal occlusion. The pattern of the mucosal injury is, in this case, potentially a consequence of acute and chronic ischemic processes secondary to mesenteric arteriovenous vasculopathy.


Assuntos
Malformações Arteriovenosas/patologia , Doença de Crohn/patologia , Mesentério/irrigação sanguínea , Tecido Adiposo/patologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artérias/anormalidades , Artérias/patologia , Constrição Patológica/complicações , Constrição Patológica/diagnóstico por imagem , Constrição Patológica/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagem , Intestino Delgado/patologia , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Mesentério/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Veias/anormalidades , Veias/patologia
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 58(3): 281-90, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24383612

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent interest has focused on the role of perioperative epidural analgesia in improving cancer outcomes. The heterogeneity of studies (tumour type, stage and outcome endpoints) has produced inconsistent results. Clinical practice also highlights the variability in epidural effectiveness. We considered the novel hypothesis that effective epidural analgesia improves cancer outcomes following gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery in patients with grouped pathological staging. METHODS: Following institutional approval, a database analysis identified 140 patients, with 2-year minimum follow-up after gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery. All patients were operated on by a single surgeon (2005-2010). Information pertaining to cancer and survival outcomes was extracted. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated a 1-year 14% vs. 33% (P = 0.01) and 2-year 27% vs. 40% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.59; 95% CI, 0.32-1.09, P = 0.087] incidence of cancer recurrence in patients with (vs. without) effective (> 36 h duration) epidural analgesia, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated increased time to cancer recurrence (HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.17-0.63, P < 0.0001) and overall survival benefit (HR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.21-0.83, P < 0.0001) at 2-year follow-up following effective epidural analgesia. Subgroup analysis identified epidural-related cancer recurrence benefit in patients with oesophageal cancer (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.75, P = 0.005) and in patients with tumour lymphovascular space infiltration (LVSI), (HR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.26-0.94, P = 0.03). Effective epidural analgesia improved estimated median time to death (2.9 vs. 1.8 years, P = 0.029) in patients with tumour LVSI. CONCLUSIONS: This study found an association between effective post-operative epidural analgesia and medium-term benefit on cancer recurrence and survival following oesophageal surgery. A prospective study that controls for disease type, stage and epidural effectiveness is warranted.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Neoplasias Esofágicas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Gástricas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Idoso , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Esôfago/patologia , Esôfago/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estômago/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Análise de Sobrevida
3.
Br J Anaesth ; 99(5): 662-5, 2007 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17872936

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines of 2002 recommended the use of ultrasound (US) for central venous catheterization in order to minimize complications associated with central line placement. An ongoing audit of line placement by anaesthetists in the theatre complex of a tertiary referral centre looked at the associated complication rates. The objective of the study was to compare complication rates pre- and post-implementation of NICE guidelines. METHODS: This prospective, single centre audit looked at all patients in whom a central venous catheter was placed for surgery. Complication rates were assessed for procedures that were performed pre- and post-implementation of NICE guidelines. In total, 438 patients were identified for the study, and the procedures were performed either by trainee or by consultant anaesthetists. RESULTS: The pre- and post-implementation complication rates were 10.5% (16/152) and 4.6% (13/284), respectively, representing an absolute risk reduction of 5.9% (95% CI 0.5-11.3%). Comparison of those procedures in which US was used when compared with the landmark technique after implementation found a reduction of 6.9% in complications (95% CI 1.4-12.4%). The reduction in complication rates was larger for specialist registrars than for consultants (11.2% vs 1.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of NICE guidelines has been associated with a significant reduction in complication rates in our tertiary referral centre. In the light of the cross-speciality evidence of US superiority and our results, it is imperative that routine use of US guidance becomes more widespread.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Londres , Auditoria Médica , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...