AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8.b: Linear accelerator performance tests.

The purpose of this guideline is to provide a list of critical performance tests to assist the Qualified Medical Physicist (QMP) in establishing and maintaining a safe and effective quality assurance (QA) program. The performance tests on a linear accelerator (linac) should be selected to fit the clinical patterns of use of the accelerator and care should be given to perform tests which are relevant to detecting errors related to the specific use of the accelerator. Current recommendations for linac QA were reviewed to determine any changes required to those tests highlighted by the original report as well as considering new components of the treatment process that have become common since its publication. Recommendations are made on the acquisition of reference data, routine establishment of machine isocenter, basing performance tests on clinical use of the linac, working with vendors to establish QA tests and performing tests after maintenance and upgrades. The recommended tests proposed in this guideline were chosen based on consensus of the guideline's committee after assessing necessary changes from the previous report. The tests are grouped together by class of test (e.g., dosimetry, mechanical, etc.) and clinical parameter tested. Implementation notes are included for each test so that the QMP can understand the overall goal of each test. This guideline will assist the QMP in developing a comprehensive QA program for linacs in the external beam radiation therapy setting. The committee sought to prioritize tests by their implication on quality and patient safety. The QMP is ultimately responsible for implementing appropriate tests. In the spirit of the report from American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 100, individual institutions are encouraged to analyze the risks involved in their own clinical practice and determine which performance tests are relevant in their own radiotherapy clinics.

Assessment of unintended shifts during frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery using cone beam computed tomography image guidance.

PURPOSE: To investigate the frequency, magnitude and possible causes of frame-shifts that may occur between treatment planning and treatment delivery when performing Gamma Knife radiosurgery with rigid frame-based immobilization. METHODS: Differences between computed tomography (CT) framed fiducial stereotactic coordinate reference and cone beam computed tomography stereotactic coordinates after image registration were recorded for 49 frame-based GK radiosurgery cases performed using the Gamma Knife Icon. Parameters recorded include rotational shifts, translational shifts, and the GK-computed Maximum Shot Displacement (MSD) between the two stereotactic coordinate spaces. Other patient-specific parameters were collected and linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of increased displacement. RESULTS: The median values of rotational shifts were: pitch 0.14°, yaw 0.17°, and roll 0.13°. The median absolute values of translational shifts were: left-right 0.39 mm, anteroposterior 0.14 mm, and superior-inferior 0. 22 mm. The median value of MSD was 0.71 mm. Twelve cases (24.5%) had a MSD of greater than 1.0 mm. Male gender was associated with increased MSD (p = 0.013) and translational shifts (root-mean-squared value, p = 0.017). Cases with large differences between right and left sided pin lengths were also associated with increased MSD (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CBCT image guidance in frame-based GK radiosurgery allows unintended frame shifts to be identified and corrected. A significant fraction (24.5%) of patients had large enough shifts to result in a MSD of greater than 1.0 mm. Male gender and eccentrically placed frames were associated with increased MSD, and particular care should be taken in these cases.

Intracranial motion during frameless Gamma-Knife stereotactic radiosurgery.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: The Gamma-Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) (Elekta AB, Stockholm) platform delivers highly conformal and precise radiation; however, intracranial displacement during treatment allows for the potential of a marginal target-miss. Frameless (mask-based) GKRS using the Gamma Knife Icon system monitors nasal tip motion as a surrogate for intracranial motion by tracking an infrared marker using a high-definition motion management (HDMM) system. To date, there is limited data available regarding the incidence and severity of motion and factors that impact intrafraction motion when treating with frameless GKRS. MATERIALS/METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to evaluate patients with brain tumors who were treated with frameless GKRS using the Gamma Knife Icon between May and December 2018. All patients underwent mask-based immobilization using a thermoplastic mask. Data on patient demographics, mask type, use of bite block, and number of treatments received, use of anxiolytics, treatment time, and whether a physics clearance check was performed prior to treatment were collected. For each treatment session, average displacement (mm), maximum displacement (mm) and total treatment time (min) were recorded and logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Data was collected for 89 consecutive treatments (38 patients). Of these, an anxiolytic was used in 61 treatments and a physics clearance check was performed for 45 treatments. The median average and maximum displacement was 0.60 mm and 1.22 mm, respectively. An average displacement greater than 0.60 mm was seen with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG) > 1, male gender, and malignant tumors (p < 0.05). Anxiolytic use prior to treatment was associated with a significant reduction in average displacement (p < 0.05). Significantly greater odds of observing a maximum displacement over 1.22 mm was seen with patients with ECOG > 1, male gender, and increased treatment time (p < 0.05). Age > 65 and anxiolytic use were associated with a significant reduction in maximum displacement (p < 0.05). Performance of clearance checks and use of bite block use did not impact average or maximum patient displacement. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate patient and treatment-related factors that influence intrafraction motion during GKRS with mask-based immobilization through HDMM tracking. Increased intracranial displacement during frameless GKRS was associated with higher ECOG, male gender, increased treatment time and malignant tumors, while anxiolytics were shown to mitigate excessive motion. Radiosurgery teams should consider these patient factors when treating patients with mask immobilization.

Observation or stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors with a slow growth rate. There exists controversy regarding whether patients should receive upfront observation, SRS, FSRT, or surgery at the time of diagnosis. For patients declining resection, this systematic review evaluates the risks and benefits between observation and SRS upon diagnosis of VS. METHODS: Published studies on VS (including acoustic neuromas) were systematically reviewed for clinical series including patients with newly/recently diagnosed unilateral VS. Studies that included patients with previous treatment for the VS or focused on patients with neurofibromatosis (or other genetic conditions) were excluded. Review articles and systematic reviews were excluded but reviewed for relevant references that would otherwise meet search criteria. RESULTS: Most patients electing observation underwent their first surveillance scan 6 months after initial diagnosis, then annually or every-other-year thereafter. Follow up was similar for patients receiving radiosurgery. The follow up period varied between studies as not all studies published at a specific time point. Observation alone conferred a radiographic tumor control rate of 65% and serviceable hearing in 71.3% at by the end of the follow up period in the reviewed studies, and 34% of patients initially opting for observation went on to ultimately elect for treatment. Initial radiosurgery resulted in a tumor control rate of 97% and serviceable hearing rate of 73.8% at by the end of the follow up period. Radiosurgery resulted in improved tumor control at the end of the follow up period (p < 0.0001), and serviceable hearing did not statistically differ (p = 0.69). There is an early risk of progressive hearing decline on patients who chose initial observation. CONCLUSION: Based on the available published data, observation after initial diagnosis is appropriate for many patients with VS without symptomatic brainstem compression. However, initial observation does risk early progressive hearing dysfunction and patients with serviceable hearing at diagnosis may benefit from early therapy. Long term follow up is critical, and an algorithm to better risk-stratify patients with newly diagnosed VS is underway.

Data collection of patient outcomes: one institution's experience.

Patient- and provider-reported outcomes are recognized as important in evaluating quality of care, guiding health care policy, comparative effectiveness research, and decision-making in radiation oncology. Combining patient and provider outcome data with a detailed description of disease and therapy is the basis for these analyses. We report on the combination of technical solutions and clinical process changes at our institution that were used in the collection and dissemination of this data. This initiative has resulted in the collection of treatment data for 23 541 patients, 20 465 patients with provider-based adverse event records, and patient-reported outcome surveys submitted by 5622 patients. All of the data is made accessible using a self-service web-based tool.

A single-gradient junction technique to replace multiple-junction shifts for craniospinal irradiation treatment.

Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) requires abutting fields at the cervical spine. Junction shifts are conventionally used to prevent setup error-induced overdosage/underdosage from occurring at the same location. This study compared the dosimetric differences at the cranial-spinal junction between a single-gradient junction technique and conventional multiple-junction shifts and evaluated the effect of setup errors on the dose distributions between both techniques for a treatment course and single fraction. Conventionally, 2 lateral brain fields and a posterior spine field(s) are used for CSI with weekly 1-cm junction shifts. We retrospectively replanned 4 CSI patients using a single-gradient junction between the lateral brain fields and the posterior spine field. The fields were extended to allow a minimum 3-cm field overlap. The dose gradient at the junction was achieved using dose painting and intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning. The effect of positioning setup errors on the dose distributions for both techniques was simulated by applying shifts of ± 3 and 5mm. The resulting cervical spine doses across the field junction for both techniques were calculated and compared. Dose profiles were obtained for both a single fraction and entire treatment course to include the effects of the conventional weekly junction shifts. Compared with the conventional technique, the gradient-dose technique resulted in higher dose uniformity and conformity to the target volumes, lower organ at risk (OAR) mean and maximum doses, and diminished hot spots from systematic positioning errors over the course of treatment. Single-fraction hot and cold spots were improved for the gradient-dose technique. The single-gradient junction technique provides improved conformity, dose uniformity, diminished hot spots, lower OAR mean and maximum dose, and one plan for the entire treatment course, which reduces the potential human error associated with conventional 4-shifted plans.