Consensus Recommendations for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome from the INTOS Workgroup.

Background: There is significant variation in methods used for diagnosis and treatment of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS). The lack of definitions and criteria for diagnosis as well as controversy in treatment options hampers standardized reporting of outcomes. In the orthopedic and plastic hand surgery literature, there are not standardized guidelines to direct evidence-based practice for hand surgeons relating to NTOS. Hence, expert consensus may provide guidance for clinical practice. Methods: An international workgroup of 21 expert hand surgeons with cumulative experience of 5519 NTOS procedures was assembled. The Delphi method was used to arrive at consensus recommendations to guide diagnosis, treatment, surgery, and postoperative management of patients with NTOS. Results: The workgroup achieved majority (greater than 75%) consensus with 17 statements. A modified version of the Society for Vascular Surgery clinical diagnostic criteria is recommended for diagnosis of NTOS. The elevated arm stress test and Tinel sign are recommended as provocative maneuvers. A cervical spine or chest radiograph should be routinely obtained preoperatively. Conservative management should be first line for NTOS, except in patients with significant muscle atrophy or weakness. An anterior supraclavicular approach is recommended for exposure of the supraclavicular brachial plexus, with the necessity for an additional infraclavicular approach or adjunctive surgeries indicated for specific patients. Conclusions: Standardized consensus guidelines help guide management of NTOS by specialized hand surgeons, with an aim toward standardizing criteria for diagnosis and treatment of patients as well as measures and tools used for research and reporting of outcomes.

Reoperation Following Primary Greater Occipital Nerve Decompression Surgery: Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although nerve decompression surgery is an effective treatment for refractory occipital neuralgia (ON), a proportion of patients experience recurrence of pain and undergo reoperation. This study analyzes the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of reoperation following primary greater occipital nerve (GON) decompression. METHODS: 215 patients who underwent 399 primary GON decompressions were prospectively enrolled. Data included patient demographics, past medical and surgical history, reoperation rates, intraoperative findings, surgical technique, and postoperative outcomes in terms of pain frequency (days/month), duration (hours/day), intensity (scale 0-10), and migraine headache index (MHI). Bivariate analyses, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: 27 (6.8%) GON decompressions required reoperation with neurectomy at a median follow-up time of 15.5 months (9.8-40.5). Cervical spine disorders on imaging that did not warrant surgical intervention (OR, 4.88; 95% 1.61-14.79; p<0.01) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 1.45-15.2; p<0.05) were significantly associated with higher rates of reoperation. At 12 months postoperatively, patients who underwent reoperation achieved similar mean reductions in pain frequency, duration, intensity and MHI, as compared to patients who underwent only primary decompression (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with ON who have a history of cervical spine disorders or RFA should be counseled that primary decompression has a higher risk of reoperation, but outcomes are ultimately comparable.

Reset Neurectomy for Cutaneous Nerve Injuries.

Diffuse cutaneous nerve injuries, often caused by a crush mechanism, are challenging for the nerve surgeon. Discrete nerve transections and focal neuromas are easier to identify and have a more distinct treatment algorithm. Following crush injury to a noncritical sensory nerve, a successful local anesthetic block proximal to the injury may help determine the possibility of surgical intervention. In these cases, we describe a technique of "reset neurectomy" whereby a neurectomy is performed proximal to the zone of injury, and immediate repair or reconstruction (with or without a nerve graft) is performed. This technique may be useful in cases of diffuse, nontransection nerve injuries in which neuropathic pain is the primary symptom.

Novel Surgical Approach for Decompression of the Scalene Triangle in Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a cause of upper extremity and shoulder dysfunction. TOS can present with a wide range of symptoms due to compression of the brachial plexus or its branches during their passage through the cervicothoracobrachial region or scalene triangle. There are three types of TOS: arterial, venous, and neurogenic. Neurogenic TOS (nTOS) is by far the most frequent type and represents more than 95% of all cases. Historically, surgical intervention for all types of TOS has evolved based on the treatment for a vascular etiology and has typically included a first rib resection. Despite nTOS being by far the more common type, most previous interventions have not considered treatment via peripheral nerve decompression.We describe surgical treatment of nTOS, performed on an outpatient basis, which focuses on the surgical decompression of the structures associated with the scalene triangle in conjunction with release of the pectoralis minor insertion through limited incisions. The procedure avoids the morbidity associated with first rib resection and is successful in ameliorating nTOS symptoms. Further, we propose a nomenclature shift to scalene triangle syndrome (STS) to reflect the nerve and arterial compressions needing to be addressed.

Supraorbital Rim Syndrome: Definition, Surgical Treatment, and Outcomes for Frontal Headache.

BACKGROUND: Supraorbital rim syndrome (SORS) is a novel term attributed to a composite of anatomically defined peripheral nerve entrapment sites of the supraorbital rim region. The SORS term establishes a more consistent nomenclature to describe the constellation of frontal peripheral nerve entrapment sites causing frontal headache pain. In this article, we describe the anatomical features of SORS and evidence to support its successful treatment using the transpalpebral approach that allows direct vision of these sites and the intraconal space. METHODS: A retrospective review of 276 patients who underwent nerve decompression or neurectomy procedures for frontal or occipital headache was performed. Of these, treatment of 96 patients involved frontal surgery, and 45 of these patients were pure SORS patients who underwent this specific frontal trigger site deactivation surgery only. All procedures involved direct surgical approach through the upper eyelid to address the nerves of the supraorbital rim at the bony rim and myofascial sites. RESULTS: Preoperative and postoperative data from the Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire were analyzed with paired t test. After surgical intervention, Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire scores decreased significantly at 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: SORS describes the totality of compression sites both at the bony orbital rim and the corrugator myofascial unit for the supraorbital rim nerves. Proper diagnosis, full anatomical site knowledge, and complete decompression allow for consistent treatment. Furthermore, the direct, transpalpebral surgical approach provides significant benefit to allow complete decompression.

The anatomical morphology of the supraorbital notch: clinical relevance to the surgical treatment of migraine headaches.

BACKGROUND: Current literature for surgical deactivation of frontal migraine trigger points does not incorporate decompression of the supraorbital foramen or fascial bands at the supraorbital rim (frontal exit) as part of the surgical procedure. To evaluate this primary compression site for the supraorbital nerve, anatomical dissections were performed and a classification system was developed. METHODS: Sixty supraorbital regions from 30 ethylene glycol-preserved cadaveric heads were dissected. Particular attention was focused on the morphology of the supraorbital rim, specifically, the presence of a supraorbital notch or supraorbital foramen. The presence or absence of a fascial band completing the notch and the patterns of fascial band variations were documented. RESULTS: A supraorbital foramen was identified 27 percent of the time and a notch was identified 83 percent of the time. When a notch was encountered, a fascial band forming the floor of the notch that completed the encirclement of the supraorbital nerve was noted in 86 percent of supraorbital regions. A classification system was developed to categorize the four common fascial band variation patterns observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study verifies the presence of a primary compression site for the supraorbital nerve that is proximal to the glabellar myofascial complex. Knowledge of this compression site and its possible anatomical variations will enable surgeons to perform a more complete supraorbital nerve decompression for migraine amelioration.

Chronic daily headaches secondary to greater auricular and lesser occipital neuromas following endolymphatic shunt surgery.

In head and neck surgery, peripheral sensory nerves are at risk for traumatic injury. These injuries are known to be peripheral triggers of chronic headaches if left untreated or unrecognised. We report the case of a patient that presented with a severe headache, nausea and emesis of 2 years duration following endolymphatic shunt placement for Meniere's disease. Nerve blockade suggested a peripheral trigger, and surgical exploration of the incision site revealed traumatic neuromas of the greater auricular and lesser occipital nerves. Subsequent nerve resection yielded complete symptomatic relief. This is the first case report of a peripherally triggered migraine headache due to the development of neuromas of the greater auricular and lesser occipital nerves, also representing a previously unreported complication of endolymphatic shunt placement. It is recommended that in patients presenting with intractable migraines and a history of head and neck surgery, diagnostic nerve blockage be used to assess for neuromas.

Soleal sling syndrome (proximal tibial nerve compression): results of surgical decompression.

BACKGROUND: Although distal tibial nerve compression is well recognized, proximal tibial nerve compression remains a rarely recognized clinical condition. This report defines the presentation, diagnosis, surgical decompression technique, and clinical outcome of neurolysis of the tibial nerve at this soleal sling compression site. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with 69 proximal tibial nerves (20 bilateral) were stratified retrospectively into three groups: neuropathy (n = 10), failed tarsal tunnel syndrome (n = 25), and trauma (n = 14). Pain level, strength of the flexor hallucis longus muscle, neurosensory testing of the hallux, and subjective sensory improvement were evaluated. Each proximal tibial nerve compression was subjected to neurolysis with division of the soleal sling. RESULTS: Results were stratified into poor, fair, good, and excellent based on the amount of pain relief and improvement in motor and sensory function. In all groups combined, there were 13 excellent (26.5 percent), 13 good (26.5 percent), 18 fair (36.7 percent), and five poor (10.2 percent) results. Results in the neuropathy group were excellent in two patients, good in three, fair in four, and poor in one (mean follow-up, 18.7 months). Results in the failed tarsal tunnel syndrome group were excellent in two, good in six, fair in 13, and poor in four patients (mean follow-up, 13.9 months). The trauma subgroup had the best outcomes: excellent in nine patients, good in four, fair in one, and poor in zero (mean follow-up, 13.4 months). CONCLUSION: Regardless of cause, if a proximal tibial nerve compression beneath the soleal sling is identified, neurolysis may improve pain and sensory and motor function. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.