Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 32(1): 97-9, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23010903

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to determine the extent and associated costs of repeat Clostridium difficile stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays in patients with initially negative PCRs. C. difficile stool PCRs were done on adult hospitalized patients with diarrhea. The number/time course of repeat PCRs on initially negative PCR patients was determined. Of 5,027 C. difficile stool PCRs, 814 (16.2 %) were positive and 4,213 (83.8 %) were negative. Ninety-seven of the initially PCR-negative patients had >2 repeat tests 1-59 days after the initial negative stool PCR. Repeat negative PCR testing rarely resulted in a subsequent positive result (0.05 %). The unnecessary costs of 97 repeat PCRs was $32,658.00. Many of these patients were originally given empiric oral anti-C. difficile therapy, in spite of repeatedly negative PCRs.


Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Diarreia/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Adulto , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economia , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Diarreia/etiologia , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/economia
5.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 167(6): 1451-5, 1996 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8956576

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We compare the reliability and define the role of plain film radiography and CT in the assessment of various severities of small-bowel obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A blinded retrospective analysis was done on 78 patients who underwent plain abdominal radiography, CT, and enteroclysis to assess for suspected small-bowel obstruction. The findings at enteroclysis and the clinical outcomes were used as standards of reference. RESULTS: The sensitivity of plain film radiography for revealing small-bowel obstruction was 69% (44/64), and its specificity was 57% (8/14). Overall accuracy of plain film radiography was 67% (52/78). The sensitivity and specificity of CT were 64% (41/64) and 79% (11/ 14), respectively. Overall accuracy of CT was 67% (52/78). When obstructions were classified as low- and high-grade partial obstruction, plain film radiography and CT had sensitivities of 86% (24/28) and 82% (23/28), respectively, for high-grade obstruction and 56% (20/36) and 50% (18/36), respectively, for low-grade obstruction. CT revealed the cause of the small-bowel obstruction in 95% (39/41) of those patients in who CT correctly showed the obstruction. CONCLUSION: Plain film radiography and CT had similar overall accuracies in showing small-bowel obstruction of various severities. Plain film radiography should remain the initial method of imaging patients with suspected small-bowel obstruction. The ability of CT to show the cause of small-bowel obstruction makes CT an important additional diagnostic tool when specific management issues must be addressed.


Assuntos
Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Idoso , Sulfato de Bário , Meios de Contraste , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...