[Aftercare Following Inpatient Rehabilitation of Patients with Obesity: Feasibility of the KgAS-Concept]. / Ambulante Nachsorge nach stationärer Adipositasrehabilitation: Machbarkeit des KgAS-Nachsorgekonzeptes.

Even though the inpatient rehabilitation of children and adolescents with obesity shows beneficial effects in short term, the relapse rate afterwards is high. Previous attempts to implement successful aftercare programs that are open to all patients were either not successful or have been cancelled. Therefore, a new program was developed and evaluated in terms of feasibility. In a cooperation of a rehabilitation clinic with aftercare specialists, 25 families were enabled to participate. During the inpatient treatment a case management was established to accompany and transfer the patients to the ambulatory care afterwards. The process and the aftercare were evaluated by questionnaires (children/adolescents, parents, aftercare specialists) as well as one-on-one interviews and a focus group with the aftercare specialists that were also analyzed. Results show the feasibility of the program and good satisfaction rates among all participating groups (children/adolescents, parents, aftercare specialists, inpatient rehabilitation center). Thus, the program might be eligible in the treatment process. However, the evaluation of the effectiveness in a randomized controlled study is recommended.

Monitoring minimal residual disease in children with high-risk relapses of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: prognostic relevance of early and late assessment.

The prognosis for children with high-risk relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is poor. Here, we assessed the prognostic importance of response during induction and consolidation treatment prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) aiming to evaluate the best time to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) for intervention strategies and in future trials in high-risk ALL relapse patients. Included patients (n=125) were treated uniformly according to the ALL-REZ BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster) 2002 relapse trial (median follow-up time=4.8 years). Patients with MRD ⩾10(-3) after induction treatment (76/119, 64%) or immediately preceding HSCT (19/71, 27%) had a significantly worse probability of disease-free survival 10 years after relapse treatment begin, with 26% (±6%) or 23% (±7%), respectively, compared with 58% (±8%) or 48% (±7%) for patients with MRD <10(-3). Conventional intensive consolidation treatment reduced MRD to <10(-3) before HSCT in 63% of patients, whereas MRD remained high or increased in the rest of this patient group. Our data support that MRD after induction treatment can be used to quantify the activity of different induction treatment strategies in phase II trials. MRD persistence at ⩾10(-3) before HSCT reflects a disease highly resistant to conventional intensive chemotherapy and requiring prospective controlled investigation of new treatment strategies and drugs.

Very early/early relapses of acute lymphoblastic leukemia show unexpected changes of clonal markers and high heterogeneity in response to initial and relapse treatment.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) quantified after induction treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) predicts risk of relapse. It has been assumed that early relapses derive from a residual population of leukemic cells, which is still present after induction and that relapsed disease will consequently be more resistant to treatment. To test these hypotheses, we performed a prospective study on patients treated according to the frontline-trial ALL-BFM 2000, which used MRD response for risk-group stratification. Patients (n=45) showed a median time to relapse of 1.5 years. In 89% of patients at least one T-cell-receptor/immunoglobulin gene rearrangement chosen for initial MRD quantification remained stable; however, at least one of the preferred markers for MRD stratification at relapse was different to diagnosis in 50% of patients. A similar proportion of very early, early and late relapses appeared to gain a marker at relapse although backtracking-analysis revealed that in 77% of cases, the gained markers were present as small sub-clones at initial diagnosis. Comparing initial and relapse MRD response to induction, 38% of patients showed a similar, 38% a better and 25% a poorer response after relapse. These data demonstrate an unexpectedly high clonal heterogeneity among very early/early relapses and challenge some current assumptions about relapsed ALL.