Prevention of agricultural injuries: an evaluation of an education-based intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an agricultural health and safety program in reducing risks of injury. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: 50 rural municipalities in the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada. INTERVENTION: The Agricultural Health and Safety Network (AHSN), a mainly educational program that administered 112 farm safety interventions over 19 years. SUBJECTS: 5292 farm people associated with 2392 Saskatchewan farms. Farms and associated farm people were categorized into three groups according to years of participation in the AHSN. IMPACT: self-reported prevalence of: (1) farm safety practices; (2) physical farm hazards. OUTCOME: (1) self-reported agricultural injuries. RESULTS: After adjustment for group imbalances and clustering at the rural municipality level, the prevalence of all impact and outcome measures was not significantly different on farms grouped according to years of AHSN participation. To illustrate, the adjusted relative risk of reporting no rollover protection on tractors among farms with none (0 years) versus high (>8 years) levels of AHSN participation was 0.95 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.30). The adjusted relative risk for agricultural injuries (all types) reported for the year before the survey was 0.99 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.32). CONCLUSIONS: Educational interventions delivered via the AHSN program were not associated with observable differences in farm safety practices, physical farm hazards, or farm-related injury outcomes. There is a need for the agricultural sector to extend the scope of its injury prevention initiatives to include the full public health model of education, engineering, and regulation.

Effect of age on hospitalized machine-related farm injuries among the Saskatchewan farm population.

Machinery-related injuries are the leading cause of fatal and hospitalized injuries on Canadian farms. In Saskatchewan, the proportion of all farm injuries related to farm machinery exceeds that reported for all of Canada. This project examined the relationship between age and various factors associated with farm machine-related injuries in Saskatchewan. A retrospective review of hospital discharge data from the administrative data set of Saskatchewan Health was conducted using external cause of injury codes to identify cases of farm machinery injury that occurred in Saskatchewan during the period April 1, 1990, to March 31, 2000. Log linear estimates of association of various factors in four age groups were derived. There were 1,493 hospitalizations attributed to farm machinery-related injuries. Among the injured cohort, age was a predictor of the rate of injury. Significant association for nature of injury, mechanism of injury, and type of machine varied by age group. These data provide insights for a case-control study of farm machinery-related injuries with the objective of determining personal, environmental, and machine-related factors that are responsible for this serious public health issue.

Case reports of on-site investigations of auger-related farm injuries.

Previous reports have indicated that injuries involving augers (screw conveyors) are a serious problem in agriculture, but to date on-site engineering inspections linking injuries to mechanical and procedural aspects have not been available. This article details four events involving injuries as the result of being entangled in auger flighting. In each report, the circumstances surrounding the injury event are outlined, and the machinery involved is evaluated in terms of its compliance with current safety standards. In three of the four instances, the machinery did not conform to current guarding standards or to safety sign standards. In these three cases, injuries were preventable with improved guarding according to ASAE Standards. In the other case, the machine complied with ASAE Standards, but the injury could have been prevented with improved guarding of the auger flighting.

Health and environment of rural families: results of a Community Canvass survey in the Prairie Ecosystem Study (PECOS).

This cross-sectional survey was conducted as Phase I of the Prairie Ecosystem Study (PECOS): Environmental Pesticide Exposure and Human Health. In November of 1995, community volunteers delivered a self-administered household questionnaire to 1185 rural households in southern Saskatchewan, Canada. The survey provided a broad description of the general health and the physical environment of 511 men, 499 women, and 393 children (< 18 years of age) residing in 549 respondent households in the rural study area (population density of about one person/km2). Families in the respondent households resided on a farm, in town or both. Of the 369 households that operated a farm, 25.2% of the households did not list the farm as their primary household. Residents of both farming and non-farming households reported contact with pesticides and fertilizers through home or garden use. History of smoking was greater among men and women from non-farming households. The most commonly reported health problems among the children were a history of bronchitis, asthma, skin allergies, pneumonia, and hay fever. The most frequently reported health problems among the men were a history of high blood pressure, bronchitis, pneumonia, hearing problems, and stress; and among the women were a history of bronchitis, high blood pressure, shortness of breath, and pneumonia. Compared to farming households, more members of non-farming households reported a history of respiratory problems, particularly bronchitis among the women and children. Overall, there were important differences in the smoking history, the occupational use of pesticides and fertilizers, and the general health status between the farming and non-farming households and individuals in this rural population.