Short-Term Risk Factors for Subtalar Arthrodesis After Primary Tibiotalar Arthrodesis.

While adjacent joint arthritis is a recognized long-term downside of primary tibiotalar arthrodesis (TTA), few studies have identified risk factors for early subtalar arthrodesis (STA) after TTA. This study aims to identify the risk factors for STA within the first few years following TTA. All patients older than 18 years undergoing TTA between 2008 and 2016 were identified retrospectively. Demographic data and comorbidities were collected alongside prior operative procedures, postoperative complications, and subsequent STA. Pre-and postoperative Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis grade of the subtalar joint and postoperative radiographic alignment were obtained. A total of 240 patients who underwent primary TTA were included in this study with median follow up of 13.8 months. Twenty patients (8.3%) underwent STA after TTA due to symptomatic nonunion of TTA in 13 (65%), progression of symptomatic subtalar osteoarthritis (OA) in 4 (20%), and symptomatic nonunion of primary TTA combined progressively symptomatic subtalar OA in 2 (10%). Preoperative radiographic subtalar OA severity and postoperative radiographic alignment were not correlated with subsequent STA. Diabetes mellitus, Charcot arthropathy, neuropathy, alcohol use, substance use disorder, and psychiatric disease were significantly associated with having a subsequent STA. The most common postoperative contributing factor for subsequent STA following primary TTA was the salvage of symptomatic ankle nonunion rather than subtalar joint disease. Patients considering an ankle fusion should be counseled of the risk of subsequent STA, especially if they have risk factors that include diabetes, Charcot arthropathy, neuropathy, alcohol use, substance use disorder, or psychiatric disease.

Arthroscopic assessment of syndesmotic instability: Are we pulling correctly in the coronal plane?

BACKGROUND: While the lateral hook test (LHT) has been widely used to arthroscopically evaluate syndesmotic instability in the coronal plane, it is unclear whether the angulation of the applied force has any impact on the degree of instability. We aimed to determine if changing the direction of the force applied while performing the LHT impacts the amount of coronal diastasis observed in subtle syndesmotic injuries. METHODS: In 10 cadaveric specimens, arthroscopic evaluation of the syndesmotic joint was performed by measuring anterior and posterior-third coronal plane diastasis in the intact state, and repeated after sequential transection of the 1) anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), 2) interosseous ligament (IOL), and 3) posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL). In all scenarios, LHT was performed under 100 N of laterally directed force. Additionally, LHT was also performed under: 1) anterior inclination of 15 degrees and 2) posterior inclination of 15 degrees in intact and AITFL+IOL deficient state. RESULTS: Compared to the intact state, the syndesmosis became unstable after AITFL +IOL transection under laterally directed force with no angulation (p = 0.029 and 0.025 for anterior and posterior-third diastasis, respectively), which worsened with subsequent PITFL transection (p = <0.001). Moreover, there was no statistical difference in anterior and posterior-third coronal diastasis in both intact and AITFL+IOL deficient states under neutral, anterior, and posteriorly directed force (p-values ranging from 0.816 to 0.993 and 0.396-0.80, respectively). However, in AITFL+IOL transected state, posteriorly directed forces resulted in greater diastasis than neutral or anteriorly directed forces. CONCLUSIONS: Angulation of the applied force ranging from 15 degrees anteriorly to 15 degrees posteriorly during intraoperative LHT has no effect on coronal plane measurements in patients with subtle syndesmotic instability. On the other hand, posteriorly directed forces result in more sizable diastasis, potentially increasing their sensitivity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When arthroscopically evaluating subtle syndesmotic instability, clinicians should assess coronal diastasis with the hook angled 15 degrees posteriorly.

Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the incidence rate of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in patients with acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries. DESIGN: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE (Ovid) databases from 2000 to September 2021. Two authors independently screened the search results, and risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) criteria. Studies on acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries with pre-operative or intra-operative imaging were included. The primary outcome was the incidence rate with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in combined and separate groups of acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries. Secondary outcomes were anatomic distribution and mean size of the (osteo)chondral lesions. RESULTS: Nine articles (402 syndesmotic injuries) were included in the final analysis. Overall (osteo)chondral lesion incidence was 20.7% (95% CI: 13.7%-29.9%). This rate was 22.0% (95% CI: 17.1-27.7) and 24.1% (95% CI: 15.6-35.2) for acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries, respectively. In the combined acute and chronic syndesmotic injury group, 95.4% of the lesions were located on the talar dome and 4.5% of the lesions were located on the distal tibia. (Osteo)chondral lesion size was not reported in any of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle are present in 21% of the patients with isolated syndesmotic injuries. No difference in incidence rate was found between the different syndesmotic injury types and it can be concluded that the majority of lesions are located on the talar dome. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020176641.

Lisfranc injury: Refined diagnostic methodology using weightbearing and non-weightbearing radiographs.

BACKGROUND: To compare diagnostic parameters for Lisfranc instability on WB and NWB radiographs and to assess the inter-observer reliability of a standardized diagnostic protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had undergone surgical treatment for subtle, purely ligamentous Lisfranc injury with both WB and NWB post-injury, pre-surgery films (n = 26) were included in this multicentre, retrospective comparative study. Also included was a control group (n = 26) of patients with isolated fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures who similarly had both WB and NWB films. Multiple midfoot distance and alignment measurements were used to evaluate the Lisfranc joint on both WB and NWB views. To evaluate interobserver reliability, measurements were made by two independent observers across a cohort subset. RESULTS: When comparing the NWB views between groups, only C1M2 (medial cuneiform- second metatarsal) distance was found to be significantly larger (∆ = 1.35 mm, p <0.001) for Lisfranc injuries. Most notably, C2M2 (Intermediate cuneiform - second metatarsal) step off-caused by lateral translation of the second metatarsal base-was not significantly different (∆ = 0.39 mm, p = 0.101) between Lisfranc patients and controls. On WB views, Lisfranc patients had significantly larger changes to C1M2 distance and C2M2 step-off as compared to controls (∆ = 2.97 mm, p <0.001 and ∆ =  1.98 mm, p <0.001 respectively). M1M2 (first to second intermetatarsal) distance was not significantly different between patients and controls in WB films. Within the cohort of ligamentous Lisfranc patients, C1M2 distance and C2M2 step-off were significantly larger in WB when compared to NWB films (∆ =  1.77 mm, p <0.001 and ∆ =  1.58 mm, p <0.001 respectively). For these parameters, inter-observer reliability scores (ICC) of >0. 90 were found when interpreting WB radiographs and ICC's ranging between 0.61 and 0.80 were found when interpreting NWB radiographs. CONCLUSION: Using WB imaging for diagnosing subtle Lisfranc instability reveals larger diastasis in the tarsometatarsal joint and has a higher interobserver reliability compared to NWB imaging. Clinical concern for subtle or occult Lisfranc instability in any patient should therefore trigger WB radiographic assessment since such injuries may be missed on NWB views.

Novel values in the radiographic diagnosis of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries.

BACKGROUND: Ligamentous Lisfranc instability is commonly missed on unilateral radiographs. However, measurement protocols for bilateral weightbearing radiographs have not been standardized. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the optimal cut-off values for diagnosing Lisfranc instability by evaluating the side-to-side differences of preoperative bilateral weightbearing radiographs among patients with surgically-confirmed ligamentous Lisfranc instability. A secondary aim was to investigate whether the midfoot measurements for detecting Lisfranc injury could also be used in patients with a pre-existing bilateral Hallux Valgus (HV) deformity by evaluating whether the Lisfranc measurements could be affected by a foot deformity as HV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical repair of ligamentous Lisfranc instability, as well as a separate cohort with bilateral hallux valgus deformity, were included in this multicenter retrospective cohort study. A standardized radiographic measurement protocol was used to assess the midfoot and a receiver operator correlation (ROC) analysis was used to identify the optimal cut-off value for measurements. Interclass Correlation (ICC) scores were calculated to assess the interrater reliability of the Lisfranc area measurement. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included in the Lisfranc group with a mean age of 33 (± 15) years and 25 patients were included in the HV group with a mean age of 51 (± 15) years. For the Lisfranc group, measurements that demonstrated a significant side-to-side difference included; increased C1M2 diastasis of 2.4 mm (± 1.4, P<0.001), increased C1M2 surface area of 24 mm2 (± 15, P<0.001), C2M2 malignment by 1.7 mm (± 1.2, P<0.001), second tarsometatarsal joint dorsal step-off sign by 0.8 mm (± 0.7, P<0.001), and arch height by 2.5 mm (± 6.4, P<0.048), all greater on the injured side. In the HV group, side-to-side measurements were not significantly different. There was no significant difference comparing the M1M2 measurement in the HV group with the injured (P = 0.16) or uninjured (P = 0.08) foot in the Lisfranc group. The optimal cut-off points were between the injured and uninjured foot in the Lisfranc group were 2.1 mm for C1M2 diastasis, 0.7 mm for the C2M2 alignment, and 30 mm2 for the C1M2 surface area. The ICC-score for the second C1M2 area measurement was 0.88. CONCLUSION: Bilateral foot weightbearing radiographs can effectively diagnose ligamentous Lisfranc instability using a standardized measurement protocol. Malalignment of the medial aspect of the second metatarsal base ≥0.3 mm relatively to the intermediate cuneiform offers a high sensitivity, and distance ≥2.1 mm between the second metatarsal base and the medial cuneiform has a high specificity. Intermetatarsal distance between the first and second metatarsal base has a low sensitivity and specificity and should not be used in solitary for diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Fusion Versus Joint-Sparing Reconstruction for Patients With Flexible Flatfoot.

AIMS: Passively correctible, adult-acquired flatfoot deformities (AAFD) are treated with joint-sparing procedures. Questions remain as to the efficacy of such procedures when clinical deformities are severe. In severe deformities, a primary fusion may lead to predictable outcomes, but risks nonunion. We evaluated pre- and postsurgical flexible AAFD patients undergoing joint-sparing or fusion procedures, comparing reoperation and complication rates. METHODS: We identified patients with flexible AAFD between January 1, 2001 and 2016. Exclusion criteria were incomplete medical record, rigid AAFD, and prior flatfoot surgery. Patient demographics, pre- and postsurgical radiographic measurements, surgery performed, and postoperative complications were evaluated by bivariate analysis, comparing joint-sparing versus fusion procedures. RESULTS: Of 239 patients (255 feet) (mean follow-up 62 ± 50 months), 209 (87%) underwent joint-sparing reconstructions, 30 (12.6%) underwent fusions. Fifty-four (24.1%) feet underwent joint-sparing reconstruction with reoperation versus 11 (35.5%) in fusion patients (P = .17). Radiographic improvement in talonavicular angle, talar first-metatarsal (anteroposterior view), and Meary's angle was higher in fusion patients (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .003, respectively). DISCUSSION: More nonunion reoperations among fusion patients were offset by reoperations in joint-sparing patients. Fusion uniquely corrected Meary's angle. Nonunion is of less concern for joint-sparing versus fusion for patients with severe flexible AAFD. Degree of deformity versus advantage of joint motion should improve decision making. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: Retrospective case series.

Medial Ankle Stability Evaluation With Dynamic Ultrasound: Establishing Natural Variations in the Healthy Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Destabilizing injuries to the deltoid ligament have relied on radiographic stress examination for diagnosis, with a focus on medial clear space (MCS) widening. Recently, studies have demonstrated the use of ultrasonography to assess deltoid ligament injury, but not the medial ankle stability. The purpose of this study was to assess the MCS via ultrasonography while weight-bearing and with a gravity stress test (GST) in the uninjured ankle as a means of establishing normative values for future comparison. METHODS: Twenty-six participants with no reported ankle injury in their premedical history were included. The MCS was examined using ultrasonography with the patient lying in a lateral decubitus position to replicate a GST with the ankle held in a neutral and plantarflexed position as well as while weight-bearing. The MCS was assessed in mm at the anteromedial and inferomedial aspect of the ankle joint. RESULTS: With weight-bearing, the average anterior MCS and inferior MCS were 3.6 and 3.3 mm, respectively. During the GST in neutral ankle position, the average anterior MCS was 4.1 mm, whereas the average inferior MCS was 4.0 mm. When measured during the GST in plantarflexed ankle position, the averages anterior MCS and inferior MCS increased to 4.4 mm. MCS values were notably higher with GST than with weight-bearing measurements (P < 0.001). MCS values were notably higher with the foot in a plantarflexed compared with a neutral position when doing GST (P < 0.001). No notable differences in MCS distance were found when comparing laterality (P > 0.05). Height had a notable effect on all MCS values (P < 0.05). Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities for ultrasonographic MCS measurements were all excellent (interclass correlation coefficient >0.75). DISCUSSION: Ultrasound can reliably measure the MCS of the ankle while doing dynamic stress manoeuvres. With the deltoid ligament intact, a GST increases MCS widening more than weight-bearing, and holding the ankle in plantarflexion while doing a gravity stress view, further increases this difference. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic studies-investigating a diagnostic test: Level III.

Screw versus suture button in treatment of syndesmosis instability: Comparison using weightbearing CT scan.

BACKGROUND: The superiority of screw or suture button fixation for syndesmotic instability remains debatable. Our aim is to compare radiographic outcomes of screw and suture button fixation of syndesmotic instability using weight bearing CT scan (WBCT). METHODS: Twenty patients with fixation of unilateral syndesmotic instability were recruited and divided among two groups (screw = 10, suture button = 10). All patients had WBCT of both ankles ≥12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In suture button group, injured side measurements were significantly different from normal side for syndesmotic area (P = 0.003), fibular rotation (P = 0.004), anterior difference (P = 0.025) and direct anterior difference (P = 0.035). In screw group, syndesmotic area was the only significantly different measurement (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: While both screw and suture button didn't completely restore the syndesmotic area as compared to the contralateral uninjured ankle, external malrotation of the fibula was uniquely associated with suture button fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Retrospective Cohort Study.

Arthroscopic coronal plane syndesmotic instability has been over-diagnosed.

PURPOSE: Ankle arthroscopy is widely used for diagnosis of syndesmotic instability, especially in subtle cases. To date, no published article has systematically reviewed the literature in aggregate to understand which instability values should be used intraoperatively. The primary aim was to systematically review the amount of tibiofibular displacement that correlates with syndesmotic instability after a high ankle sprain. A secondary aim is to assess the quality of such research. METHODS: Systematic searches of EMBASE (Ovid) and MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were used. INCLUSION CRITERIA: studies that arthroscopically evaluated the fibular displacement at various stages of syndesmotic ligament injury. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality using the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) Tool and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). RESULTS: Eight cadaveric studies and three clinical studies were included for review. All studies reported displacement in the coronal plane, four studies reported in the sagittal plane, and one reported findings in the rotational plane. Four cadaveric studies had a similar experimental set up and the weighted mean associated with instability in the coronal plane could be calculated and was 2.9 mm at the anterior portion of the distal tibiofibular joint and 3.4 mm at the posterior portion. Syndesmotic instability in the sagittal plane is less extensively studied, however available data from a cadaveric study suggests thresholds of 2.2 mm of posterior fibular translation when performing an anterior to posterior hook test and 2.6 mm of anterior fibular translation when performing a posterior to anterior hook test. CONCLUSIONS: The results have concluded that the commonly used 2.0 mm threshold value of distal tibiofibular diastasis may lead to overtreatment of syndesmotic instability, and that using threshold values of 2.9 mm measured at the anterior portion of the incisura and 3.4 mm at the posterior portion may represent better cut off values. Given the ready availability of 3 mm probes among standard arthroscopic instrumentation, at the very least surgeons should use 3 mm in lieu of 2 mm probes intraoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The Effect of Gastrocnemius Recession and Tendo-Achilles Lengthening on Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the available clinical and radiographic evidence for incorporation of a gastrocnemius recession or tendo-Achilles lengthening into the surgical correction of adult acquired flatfoot deformity. A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Among the relevant articles, the level of evidence and quality was identified using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies tool. No study explicitly examined whether clinical or radiographic outcomes after adult acquired flatfoot deformity correction are improved when incorporating a gastrocnemius recession or tendo-Achilles lengthening compared with when no such procedure is performed, nor have they directly compared outcomes between 2 procedures. Studies demonstrated an overall improvement in postoperative range of motion and plantar flexion power after gastrocnemius recession, but such findings are hard to separate from the clinical contribution of concomitant corrective procedures to the foot itself. All studies that analyzed anteroposterior talo-calcaneal angle, anteroposterior lateral talo-first metatarsal angle and calcaneal inclination angle revealed improvement of each parameter postoperatively. There were no high-level evidence studies in the literature explicitly quantifying ankle range of motion, plantar flexion power, or radiographic impact of gastrocnemius recession or tendo-Achilles lengthening on adult acquired flatfoot deformity correction. Although gastrocnemius-soleus complex contractures have certainly been demonstrated to coexist with adult acquired flatfoot deformity, support for lengthening procedures is largely based on expert opinion or case series and is difficult to distinguish from the clinical contribution of associated corrective procedures.

Utility of Volumetric Measurement via Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography Scan to Diagnose Syndesmotic Instability.

BACKGROUND: Weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) allows evaluation of the distal syndesmosis under physiologic load. We hypothesized that WBCT volumetric measurement of the distal syndesmosis would be increased on the injured as compared to the contralateral uninjured side and that these 3-dimensional (3D) calculations would be a more sensitive determinant than 2-dimensional (2D) methodology among patients with syndesmotic instability. METHODS: Twelve patients with unilateral syndesmotic instability requiring operative fixation who underwent preoperative bilateral foot and ankle WBCT were included in the study group. The control group consisted of 24 patients without ankle injury who underwent similar imaging. On WBCT scan, 2D measurements of the syndesmosis joint were first measured 1 cm above the joint line in the axial plane via syndesmotic area and distances between the anterior, middle, and posterior quadrants. Thereafter, comparative 3D volumetric measurements of the syndesmotic joint were also calculated: (1) from the tibial plafond extending until 3 cm proximally, (2) 5 cm proximally, and (3) 10 cm proximally. RESULTS: In patients with unilateral syndesmotic instability, all 3 weight-bearing volumetric measurements were significantly larger on the injured side as compared to the contralateral, uninjured side (P < .001). In the control group, there was no difference between syndesmotic volumes at any level. Of these 3 anatomic reference points, the 3D measurement spanning from the tibial plafond to a level 5 cm proximally had the highest relative volumetric ratio between the injured and uninjured side, suggesting it is the most sensitive in distinguishing between stable and unstable syndesmotic injury (P < .001). Notably, this 3D volumetric measurement was also more sensitive than 2D measurements (P = .001). CONCLUSION: 3D volumetric measurement of the syndesmosis joint appears to be the most effective way to diagnose syndesmotic instability, compared with more traditional 2D syndesmosis measurement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Follow-up radiographs in isolated Greater Tuberosity fractures lead to a change in treatment recommendation; an online survey study.

INTRODUCTION: It is common practice to obtain follow-up radiographs of non-operatively treated isolated greater tuberosity (GT) fractures 1 to 2 weeks after trauma. However, the majority of non-operatively treated GT fractures remain stable and do not require reconsideration of the initial treatment decision. Radiological follow-up therefore might be unnecessary. Our primary objective was to study whether radiological folow-up changes the initial treatment recommendation, hypothesizing no change. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographs of 25 patients diagnosed with an isolated GT fracture were selected from our hospital database and presented on a web-based platform. Sixty-eight trauma- and orthopedic surgeons evaluated these radiographs. First the radiographs directly post-trauma and then, in random order, the radiographs 5-14 days post-trauma alongside the first radiographs. Each observer evaluated each set of radiographs once. The observers answered which treatment they would recommend (non-operative/operative), and how certain they were about their advice (absolutely certain, certain, some doubt, very uncertain). Recommendation-consistency and inter-observer agreement are presented as percentages and intra class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Overall, 84% (95% CI 82.1-85.8) of treatment recommendations was unchanged after evaluation of the second radiograph. Agreement within each observer ranged from 60 to 98%. The mean proportion of patients about whom the observers were (absolutely) certain of their recommendation increased from 70% at the first evaluation to 83% at the second evaluation (12.8; 95% CI 9.8-15.9). Furthermore, the ICC between the surgeons improved from 0.37 (95% CI 0.26-0.54) for the first evaluation to 0.60 (95% CI 0.47-0.74) for the second. CONCLUSION: In 16% of the patients the treatment recommendation for an isolated GT fracture changed after the evaluation of radiographs 1 to 2 weeks post-trauma. In addition, surgeons were more certain about their recommendation and there was less inter-observer variation. Radiological follow-up of a non-operatively treated isolated GT fracture therefore seems justifiable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, diagnostic study.

Tibial Stress Fracture Following Ankle Arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: End-stage ankle arthritis is frequently treated with either tibiotalar or tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis, but the inherent loss of accommodative motion increases mechanical load across the distal tibia. Rarely, patients can go on to develop a stress fracture of the distal tibia without any antecedent traumatic event. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of tibial stress fracture after ankle arthrodesis, highlight any related risk factors, and identify the effectiveness of treatment strategies and their healing potential. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at 2 large academic medical centers to identify patients who had undergone ankle arthrodesis and subsequently developed a stress fracture of the tibia. Any patient with a tibial stress fracture before ankle arthrodesis, or with a nontibial stress fracture, was excluded from the study. RESULTS: A total of 15 out of 1046 ankle fusion patients (1.4%) developed a tibial stress fracture at a mean time of 42 ± 82 months (range, 3-300 months) following the index procedure. The index procedure for these 15 patients who went on to subsequently develop stress fractures included isolated ankle arthrodesis (n = 8), ankle arthrodesis after successful subtalar fusion (n = 2), primary TTC arthrodesis (n = 2), and ankle arthrodesis subsequent to successful subtalar fusion with resultant ankle nonunion requiring revision TTC nailing (n = 3). Four patients had undergone fibular osteotomy with subsequent onlay strut fusion, and 5 had undergone complete resection of the lateral malleolus. Stress fracture location was found to be at the level of the fibular osteotomy in 2 patients and at the proximal end of an existing or removed implant in 9. Fourteen of the 15 patients had a nondisplaced stress fracture and were initially treated with immobilization and activity modification. Of these, 3 failed to improve with nonoperative treatment and subsequently underwent operative fixation (intramedullary nail in 2; plate fixation in 1). Only 1 of the 15 patients presented with a displaced fracture and underwent immediate plate fixation. All patients reported pain improvement and were ultimately healed at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this case series review, we found a 1.4% incidence of tibial stress fracture after ankle arthrodesis, and both hardware transition points and a fibular resection or osteotomy appear to be risk factors. Operative intervention was required in approximately 25% of this population, but the majority of tibial stress fractures following ankle fusion were successfully treated nonoperatively, and ultimately all healed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Graft Site Morbidity in Elbow Ligament Reconstruction Procedures: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear which tendon harvest for ulnar or lateral collateral ligament reconstruction has the lowest graft site morbidity rate. PURPOSES: To obtain graft site morbidity rates after tendon harvest for ulnar and lateral collateral ligament reconstruction procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review/Meta-analysis. METHODS: Studies were eligible if (1) patients had undergone elbow ligament reconstruction procedures; (2) original data for at least 5 patients were available; (3) the article was written in English, German, or Dutch; (4) a full-text article was available; and (5) information about graft site morbidity was available. The review excluded studies about complicated elbow ligament reconstruction procedures due to initial fractures, revision procedures, or circumferential graft techniques; animal studies; (systematic) reviews; and expert opinions. Because the majority of studies were case reports, no selection form or overall scoring system to evaluate methodological quality was used. RESULTS: The review included 619 patients with an ulnar or lateral collateral ligament reconstruction procedure. The autograft types used included palmaris longus tendon (58%), gracilis tendon (24%), semitendinosus tendon (8%), triceps tendon (7%), toe extensor tendon (<2%), plantaris tendon (<2%), extensor carpi radialis longus tendon (<1%), and Achilles tendon (<1%). CONCLUSION: Graft site morbidity occurred in 1% of the patients after an ulnar or lateral collateral ligament reconstruction procedure. This study did not have enough samples of all the autograft types to conclude that autograft type and graft site morbidity are unrelated.