In vivo performance evaluation of bi-directional ultrasonic axial transmission for cortical bone assessment.

Our objective was to assess a new quantitative ultrasound device suitable for the measurement of speed of sound in radius. The so-called "bidirectional" technique allows an accurate estimation of velocity based on a compensation for soft tissue effects implemented directly inside the probe. Velocity measurements at 1 MHz of the first arriving signal were performed at the one third distal radius in 358 enrolled women. The average velocity by age decade increases to a peak velocity of 4043 m/s in the class 30-39 y (n = 19) and decreases thereafter. Fracture discrimination was investigated on the subset of the population for which dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement was available, in addition to first arriving signal velocity measurements. The study group consisted of 122 postmenopausal women without history of fracture (group NF) and 44 postmenopausal patients (group F) with osteoporotic fractures (hip, spine, Colles fracture). When adjusted for age and bone mass index, the odds ratio (OR) for fracture prediction by ultrasound velocity, was 1.81 (1.21; 2.70) and OR associated to neck femur BMD was 2.07 (1.31-3.29). For the full model including age and body mass index as cofactors, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77, either for ultrasound velocity or neck femur bone mineral density. Despite the small population and the variety of fractures in the fracture group, our data indicate that the velocity of the first arriving signal measured by bidirectional technique discriminates patients with osteoporotic fracture from controls.

Fluoride for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of fluoride therapy on bone loss, vertebral and non-vertebral fractures and side effects in postmenopausal women. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Medline, Current Contents and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Registry up to December 1998. SELECTION CRITERIA: Two independent reviewers selected RCTs which met predetermined inclusion criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data using predetermined forms and assessed the methodological quality of the trials using a validated scale. For dichotomous outcomes, relative risks (RR) were calculated and for continuous outcomes, weighted mean differences (WMD) of percentage change from baseline were calculated. Where heterogeneity existed (determined by a chi-square test) a random effects model was used. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven studies (1429 subjects) met the inclusion criteria. The increase in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was found to be higher in the treatment group than in the control group with a WMD 8.1% (95%CI: 7.15,9.09) after two years of treatment and 16.1%(95%CI: 14.65,17.5) after four years. The RR for new vertebral fractures was not significant at two years [0.87 (95%CI: 0.51,1.46)] or at four years [0.9(95%CI: 0.71,1.14)]. The RR for new non-vertebral fractures was not significant at two years 1.2(95%CI: 0.68,2.1) but was increased at four years in the treated group 1.85(95%CI: 1.36,2.5), especially if used at high doses and in a non slow release form. The RR for gastrointestinal side effects was not significant at two years 2.18(95%CI: 0.86,1.21) but was increased at four years in the treated group 2.18(95%CI: 1.69,4.57) especially if fluoride was used at high doses and in a non slow release form. The number of withdrawals and dropouts was not different between treated and control groups at two and four years. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Although fluoride has an ability to increase BMD at lumbar spine, it does not result in a reduction of vertebral fractures. In increasing the dose of fluoride, one increases the risk of non-vertebral fracture and gastrointestinal side effects without any effect on the vertebral fracture rate.

Cyclosporine for rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the short-term (up to one year) effects of cyclosporine for rheumatoid arthritis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group trials register, and Medline, up to 1997, using the search strategy developed by the Cochrane Collaboration (Dickersin 1994). The search was complemented with bibliography searching of the reference list of the trials retrieved from the electronic search. Key experts in the area were contacted for further published and unpublished articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing cyclosporine against placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers determined the trials to be included based on inclusion and exclusion criteria (GW, MSA). Data were independently abstracted by two reviewers (DH, GW),and checked by a third reviewer (BS) using a pre-developed form for the rheumatoid arthritis sub-group of the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group. Methodological quality of the RCTs and CCTs was assessed by two reviewers (BS, DH). Rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures were extracted from the publications for change from baseline endpoints. Sufficient data were obtained to include in the pooled analysis the number of swollen joints, physician global assessment, patient global assessment and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). MAIN RESULTS: Three trials and 318 patients were included. A statistically significant decrease in the number of tender and swollen joints was observed for cyclosporine when compared to placebo. The standardized mean difference (SMD) for the change in the number of swollen joints was -0.969. Significant improvements in pain and the functional index were also found for cyclosporine. More side effects occurred in the cyclosporine group compared to placebo. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine has an important clinical benefit int the short-term (up to one year) treatment of patients with progressive rheumatoid arthritis.

Fluoride for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic fractures: a meta-analysis.

We conducted an effectiveness meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of fluoride therapy on bone loss, vertebral and nonvertebral fractures and side effects in postmenopausal women. A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, Current Contents and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Registry. Two independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials which met predetermined inclusion criteria. They independently extracted data using predetermined forms and assessed the methodologic quality of the trials using a validated scale. For dichotomous outcomes, the relative risk (RR) was calculated, and for continuous outcomes, the weighted mean difference (WMD) of percentage change from baseline was calculated. Where heterogeneity existed (determined by a chi-square test) a random effects model was used. Eleven studies (1429 subjects) met the inclusion criteria. The increase in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was found to be higher in the treatment group than in the control group with a WMD 8.1% (95% CI: 7.15, 9.09) after 2 years of treatment and 16.1% (95% CI: 14.65, 17.5) after 4 years. The RR for new vertebral fractures was not significant at 2 years [0.87 (95% CI: 0.51, 1.46)] or at 4 years [0.9 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.14)]. The RR for new nonvertebral fractures was not significant at 2 years [1.2 (95% CI: 0.68, 2.10)] but was increased at 4 years in the treated group [1.85 (95% CI: 1.36, 2.50)], especially if used at high doses and in a non-slow-release form. The RR for gastrointestinal side effects was not significant at 2 years [2.18 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.21)] but was increased at 4 years in the treated group [2.18 (95% CI: 1.69, 4.57)], especially if fluoride was used at high doses and in a non-slow-release form. The number of withdrawals and dropouts was not different between treated and control groups at 2 and 4 years. Thus, although fluoride has an ability to increase bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, it does not result in a reduction in vertebral fractures. Increasing the dose of fluoride increases the risk of nonvertebral fractures and gastrointestinal side effects without any effect on the vertebral fracture rate.

[Respiratory involvement in ankylosing spondylarthritis: relations to alpha-1-antitrypsin phenotypes and tobacco consumption]. / Atteinte respiratoire de la spondylarthrite ankylosante: ses rapports avec les phénotypes de l'alpha-1-antitrypsine et la consommation de tabac.

The distribution of alpha-1-antitrypsin phenotypes was similar in 555 controls and 98 patients with ankylosing spondylitis: the MM phenotype (including "main" MM subtypes, i.e., M2M2 and M3M3, and "secondary" MM subtypes) was found in 86% of subjects and "rare" phenotypes combining M, F, S, and Z in 14%. Six per cent of the controls and none of the ankylosing spondylitis patients had the M4M4 phenotype (p < 0.01). Respiratory function tests were performed in 49 patients with axial ankylosing spondylitis and 30 controls matched on sex, age, body mass index, smoking status, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use and distribution of "main" and "secondary" phenotypes (no subjects in this study had "rare" phenotypes); the significant reduction in chest expansion seen in the ankylosing spondylitis group (5.6 +/- 2.7 cm versus 8.7 +/- 1.2; p < 0.001) was correlated with total capacity (p < 0.04) and vital capacity (p < 0.001). Restrictive ventilatory dysfunction was seen in four ankylosing spondylitis patients versus no controls (p < 0.02). Proximal airway obstruction, pulmonary distension and decreases in the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide were seen in similar proportions of ankylosing spondylitis patients and controls. In the ankylosing spondylitis group, evidence of pulmonary distension included increases in mean residual functional capacity and mean residual volume (105.6 +/- 21.2% versus 94.8 +/- 17.4, p < 0.03, and 100.3 +/- 22.8% versus 88.6 +/- 17.9, p < 0.04, respectively) and bullous emphysema in the lung bases in two patients (versus no controls). In the small subgroup of ankylosing spondylitis patients with lung distension or a decreased diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, smokers and nonsmokers were evenly balanced but subjects with "secondary" phenotypes outnumbered those with "main" phenotypes (p < 0.02); in contrast, our data suggested that smoking may play the central role in the proximal airway obstruction. Our findings suggest that in addition to previously established causes of pulmonary involvement in ankylosing spondylitis a "secondary" MM phenotype (i.e., neither M2M2 nor M3M3) may be a risk factor for lung distension and impaired diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide.