RESUMO
Background: Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, or Sweet's Syndrome (SS), was first characterized by Dr. Robert Sweet in 1964 with eight cases of fever, neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocytosis, dermatological lesions, and histological evidence of dense dermal infiltration by mature neutrophils. SS presents in three settings: idiopathic, malignancy-associated, and drug-induced. In 1996, Walker and Cohen outlined the current diagnostic criteria for drug-induced SS with abrupt onset of painful lesions, dermal histology showing dense neutrophilic infiltrate, pyrexia > 38 °C, temporal relationship of drug administration to clinical presentation, and symptom resolution following drug withdrawal or systemic corticosteroid treatment. SS has rarely been reported in association with gynecologic malignancies. Method: Case Report. Case: A 41-year-old female receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma presented for evaluation of cyclic fevers with dermatologic lesions following treatment with Carboplatin and Taxol, with Pegfilgrastim. On days 11-17 of treatment she reported fevers ranging from 101°F-104°F (38 °C- 40 °C) with subsequent eruption of truncal erythematous, pustular, and painful coalescing plaques. Lesion biopsies confirmed histologic presence of dense neutrophilic infiltration. The patient was initiated on oral corticosteroid therapy with symptom improvement. Discussion: This case represents an example of SS in a patient receiving therapy with the most commonly implicated medication class, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF). In drug-induced SS, there's often a temporal relationship between medication administration and symptom development. In this case, all criteria for drug-induced SS were met with a GCS-F as the likely causative agent. This case illustrates a rare diagnosis in the context of gynecologic cancer treatment and will expand available reports of SS in the Gynecologic Oncology literature. We hope to elicit more prompt recognition and diagnosis of SS from practitioners to minimize patient morbidity and long-term sequelae.
RESUMO
Proteus syndrome is a genetic condition with an estimated incidence of less than one in a million. This condition is sporadic and presents as progressive, mosaic overgrowth of different tissues. Clinical manifestations are diverse, with the reported involvement of lungs, skin, blood cells, the nervous system and bones. Gynecologic manifestations have rarely been reported in the literature. This case is the first to be reported in the literature of a woman with Proteus syndrome diagnosed in her prepubertal years and presenting at 34 years old with a cervical mass protruding from the vagina. The patient sought medical intervention only after the prolapse was advanced and symptomatic. Management of this case was surgical and consisted of vaginal hysterectomy, with vaginal suspension.
RESUMO
Objectives This article estimates and compares public health costs of universal versus risk-based intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) administration for women with unknown Group B streptococcus (GBS) status at term. Study Design The annual number of women in the U.S. who are: unscreened for GBS, without risk factors, delivering vaginally, multiparous, and eligible for discharge within 24 hours was estimated. Under the risk-based strategy, women and neonates were assumed to stay another day for observation and incur the cost of an additional 24-hour stay. With universal IAP administration, women delivering without complications were assumed to be discharged within 24 hours, with an incurred cost of penicillin. Results The estimated cost for the risk-based management of unscreened women at term without rupture of membranes (ROM) > 18 hours ranged from $468,886,831 to $850,556,179. Similarly, the cost of managing unscreened women without maternal intrapartum fever (MIF) ranged from $742,024,791 to $919,269,233. Alternatively, universal IAP administration costs ranged from $470,107,674 to $568,359,086.5. Cost comparisons yielded an equivalence or up to a 33.2% reduction in cost, and 36.6 to 38.2% reduction in cost for women without ROM > 18 hours and MIF, respectively. Conclusions Universal IAP may be cost saving due to the reduction in extended hospitalizations for neonates and healthy mothers.
