Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of lymphoproliferative disorders--interpretations based on morphologic criteria alone: results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytopathology.

CONTEXT: Diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders is one of the most challenging tasks faced by the cytologist. The initial cytomorphologic evaluation of lymphoproliferative lesions directs the choice of ancillary studies that ultimately lead to a diagnosis based on the World Health Organization classification system using a composite of clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of participating laboratories in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-Gynecologic Cytopathology to appropriately categorize lymphoproliferative lesions based solely on cytomorphologic criteria. DESIGN: Laboratory responses for lymph node aspirates were examined. All responses were based on review of glass slides without ancillary immunologic or molecular data available. The benchmarking data provided for each specific diagnosis were analyzed, with a focus on the performance for evaluation of lymphoproliferative lesions. RESULTS: Based on morphology alone, responses for lymph node aspirates in the Non-Gynecologic Cytopathology program were correct to the exact reference diagnosis for 87.1% of Hodgkin lymphoma. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma was identified in 69.5% of the large cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases, of which 66.8% were correctly classified as large cell type. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma was identified in 68.1% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, other than large cell cases, and of these, 94.7% were identified as other than large cell type. CONCLUSIONS: The spectrum of specific responses was consistent for lymphoproliferative lesions, with a reasonable differential diagnosis based on cytomorphology alone, which, in practice, facilitates the appropriate choice of immunophenotypic markers and other ancillary studies.

Distinguishing carcinoid tumor of the mediastinum from thymoma: correlating cytologic features and performance in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytopathology.

CONTEXT: The cytologic features of carcinoid tumor in mediastinal fine-needle aspiration are well described. Nevertheless, this tumor may be difficult to distinguish from thymoma in this site. OBJECTIVE: We sought to correlate the cytologic features of carcinoid tumor of the mediastinum in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytopathology with the frequency of misclassification as thymoma. DESIGN: We reviewed 446 interpretations from 18 different cases of carcinoid tumor in mediastinum and correlated the cytologic features with performance. RESULTS: Cases were more frequently classified as thymoma (158 responses, 35%) than as carcinoid tumor (126 responses, 28%). The best-performing case was classified as carcinoid tumor only 56% of the time. Three cytologic patterns were identified. Four cases consisted of isolated round cells with salt-and-pepper chromatin. Four cases consisted of isolated spindle and round cells with salt-and-pepper chromatin. The remaining 10 cases consisted of cohesive fragments of crowded cells with finely granular chromatin showing numerous pyknotic cells mimicking lymphocytes. Prominent vasculature patterns were not a feature of any of the cases. There was no correlation between any pattern and the rate of classification as carcinoid tumor or thymoma (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Carcinoid tumor of the mediastinum is frequently misclassified as thymoma in this program. Although some cytologic patterns resemble thymoma, the lack of correlation of these patterns with performance suggests that at least part of the reason for misclassification may be failure to consider the correct diagnosis or a lack of familiarity with discriminating cytologic criteria.