Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(5): 101372, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583715

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Scheduled administration of analgesics was proven superior to on-demand dosing following cesarean deliveries. However, this protocol was not compared after vaginal delivery. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a fixed- vs on-demand analgesic protocol for the management of pain in the first 24 hours after a vaginal delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, prospective, controlled trial was conducted at a single tertiary medical center between June 1, 2020 and June 30, 2022. Vaginally delivered patients were randomly assigned to receive oral analgesics (paracetamol 1 g + ibuprofen 400 mg) either every 6 hours for the first 24 hours postpartum (scheduled analgesia group) or as needed (on-demand group). Pain level during the first 24 hours postdelivery was measured using a 10-point visual analog scale. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were randomized 1:1 to the 2 cohorts. Baseline and delivery characteristics, including oxytocin augmentation, epidural anesthesia, episiotomy rate, and neonatal birthweight, were comparable between groups. Patients in the scheduled group received more paracetamol and ibuprofen doses in the first 24 hours (2.9±1.3 and 2.9±1.2 doses vs 0.8±1.1 and 0.7±1.1 doses, respectively; P<.001). Pain score was comparable between study groups (5.31±1.92 vs 5.29±1.67; P=.626) even after subanalysis for primiparity, episiotomy, and vacuum-assisted delivery (P>.05). However, patients on a fixed treatment schedule were more likely to breastfeed their baby (98% vs 88%; P=.006) as than those receiving treatment on demand. In addition, they were more satisfied with their labor and delivery experience, as evaluated by Birth Satisfaction Scale questionnaires quality control (37.9±4.7 vs 31.1±5.2; P=.0324), patient attributes (35.0±5.1 vs 30.3±6.3; P=.0453), and stress experienced (58.1±8.5 vs 50.1±8.3; P=.0398). No side effects or adverse outcomes were reported in either group. CONCLUSION: A scheduled analgesic protocol for postpartum pain management following vaginal delivery revealed similar pain scores compared with an on-demand protocol, although it was associated with higher breastfeeding rates and higher maternal satisfaction.


Assuntos
Acetaminofen , Parto Obstétrico , Ibuprofeno , Medição da Dor , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Gravidez , Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Ibuprofeno/administração & dosagem , Ibuprofeno/efeitos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração Oral , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição da Dor/métodos , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Esquema de Medicação , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Satisfação do Paciente
2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 159(3): 923-927, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35574997

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The forebag is a pocket of amniotic fluid preceding the fetal presenting part. Herein we describe the feasibility of transvaginal measurements of the forebag and assess its correlation with the standard amniotic fluid index (AFI). METHODS: A prospective study was carried out between January 2019 and July 2020. Eligible cases were women with singletons, vertex presentation, and normal AFI at term. We assessed the implementation and acceptance of a novel process in the clinical practice setting. Feasibility was assessed by using transvaginal ultrasound to measure the three orthogonal planes of the forebag. The vaginal fluid index (VFI) was defined as the volume composite of the three orthogonal planes. Correlations of the forebag measurements with both AFI and maximal vertical pocket were then calculated. RESULTS: In total, 292 out of 305 (95.7%) women were enrolled. All participants completed both transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound, of which the vaginal pocket was demonstrated in 266 (91.1%) cases. We found significant correlations, in both nulliparas and multiparas, between the vaginal pocket measurements and the VFI to both the AFI and maximal vertical pocket measurements (R = 0.38, P < 0.001; R = 0.3, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: We introduced a new ultrasound variable, the VFI, with a high feasibility rate. This may provide invaluable information for future decision making around the time of delivery.


Assuntos
Líquido Amniótico , Líquidos Corporais , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Líquido Amniótico/diagnóstico por imagem , Âmnio , Ultrassonografia , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...