Five-Year Survival and Complications of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR): A Single Tertiary Center Registry for All-Comers Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Studies on the mid and long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are scarce. This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of TEVAR for all-comers patients with various types of thoracic aortic pathologies, predominantly thoracic aortic dissections and thoracic aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2015, 123 consecutive patients with thoracic aortic pathologies underwent TEVAR. The patients were divided into groups based on aortic pathologies (dissections or aneurysms) and the type of procedure (hybrid TEVAR or non-hybrid TEVAR). Mortality, complications, and reintervention rates were compared between these four groups. The Kaplan-Meier curve and the Cox regression analysis were employed to estimate survivals and factors associated with 5-year mortality. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three consecutive patients with various aortic pathologies undergoing TEVAR were evaluated. Hypertension (79.7 %) and smoking (39 %) were the most common comorbidities in the study population. The patients were followed up for a mean duration of 58.1 ± 7.1 months to evaluate the postprocedural surveillance. Most complications occurred in the dissection and hybrid groups; however, these differences were nonsignificant. The overall 5-year surveillance and reintervention rates were 65 % and 12.1 %, respectively. A significant difference existed in 5-year survival between the patients with aneurysmal and aortic dissection pathologies based on the log-rank test (P = 0.01). On the other hand, no significant differences were observed in 5-year survival between the patients who underwent hybrid and non-hybrid TEVAR. The Cox regression analysis confirmed that chronic kidney disease, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, age >65 years, platelet counts <150∗ 103/µL, aneurysmal aortic pathology, and ejection fraction ≤ 50 % were predictors of 5-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcomes of TEVAR for various aortic pathologies disclosed that this procedure was well-tolerated in a group of patients with high comorbid conditions. The five-year survival rate of TEVAR for thoracic aortic dissections was more favorable than that for thoracic aortic aneurysms, but there were no significant differences between hybrid and non-hybrid procedures regarding the mortality rate.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation with bioprosthetic balloon expandable valve.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of the transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves with transcatheter aortic valves. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled all consecutive patients who were considered high risk for reoperations by the heart team and who underwent transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves in Tehran Heart Center, Tehran, Iran. All the procedures were performed via the transfemoral venous route under echocardiography and fluoroscopy guidance with Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). RESULTS: Ten patients underwent successful transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in the tricuspid position without any major complications or need for emergency surgical interventions. The mean age was 54.1 ± 17.1 years, and 8 patients were female. The median follow-up was 19.5 months (16-32.25 mon). The mean period between the last tricuspid valve replacement and transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation was 4.9 ± 2.2 years. The bioprosthetic valves were Hancock in three patients, Mosaic in the other three patients, and Biocor, Pericarbon, Perimount, and Epic in the other patients. After the procedure, the clinical and functional status improved significantly in all the patients. The mean transvalvular gradient decreased from 6.75 ± 2.66 mm Hg to 2.85 ± 0.89 (P < 0.001), and the postoperative tricuspid regurgitation severity decreased significantly in almost all the patients. The hospitalization period after the procedure was 4.4 ± 1.7 days. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk patients, transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation seems to be a safe and minimally invasive alternative to reoperations for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves.