An exceptional cause of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome in a 10-year-old boy.

Polyuria-polydipsia syndrome is a frequent symptom in pediatrics, primarily attributed to diabetes mellitus. In the context of diabetes insipidus, this syndrome can stem from central or nephrogenic factors. Sjögren's syndrome, an uncommon autoimmune disease in children, can affect multiple organs. Kidney involvement as described in adults is usually related to glomerular or tubular impairment, often linked to distal tubular acidosis. As a kidney involvement during childhood, Sjögren's syndrome has rarely been reported. Hereby, we present the case of Sjögren's syndrome revealed by polyuria-polydipsia syndrome in a 10-year-old boy.

[Type IVa2 urinary lithiasis and associated pathologies: About 3 cases]. / Lithiase urinaire de type IVa2 et pathologies associées : à propos de 3 cas.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary lithiasis is a very common condition. The morpho-constitutional analysis of urinary stones is important for etiological diagnosis. It guides the explorations and the specific management. Type IVa2 stones are rare, have particular morphology and correspond to very targeted pathologies. We propose to report our cases of patients diagnosed with type IVa2 urinary lithiasis. METHODS: Our retrospective work focused on three cases of patients with the morphological type of renal lithiasis IVa2, collected between 2008 and 2020 in the Medicine A Department of Charles Nicolle Hospital in Tunis. RESULTS: All three patients were female; average age 37.6 years. The clinical symptomatology was identical marked by renal colic with recurrent episodes. The presence of a type IVa2 stone, isolated or associated with other components, guided the etiological investigation to look for a secondary or primary cause of distal renal tubular acidosis. We retained the diagnosis of a primary hyperparathyroidism in one case and a primary Gougerot-Sjögren's syndrome in the second case, and probable in the last case. CONCLUSION: Determination of urolithiasis nature (morphological and chemical), although carried out late, was of major interest to us and allowed us to make the diagnosis of distal tubular acidosis.

Peritoneal dialysis in the era of COVID-19: experience of a Tunisian center.

The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed the health landscape by hampering the management of patients with chronic diseases. Providing optimal healthcare has become a critical issue, especially for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving in-center dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) has the advantage of being a home-based therapy. Several papers about COVID-19 in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population have been published, but few studies focused on the PD population, with limited case series. In this paper, we share our strategy for managing PD patients during the pandemic and describe the characteristics of 24 episodes of COVID-19 that occurred in our PD patients. Also, we report the impact of the pandemic on different outcomes and discuss the challenges of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the time of COVID-19 and the advantages of PD. During the period from December 2019 to September 2021, 127 patients received PD in our center. Among them, we recorded 24 episodes of COVID-19 that occurred in 20 patients, corresponding to an incidence of 8.4 per 1000 patient-months. None of the 20 patients with COVID-19 were vaccinated and there was a significant male gender predominance in the COVID-19 group compared to the non-COVID-19 group. The prevalence of diabetic nephropathy and primary glomerulonephritis were also significantly higher in the COVID-19 group. The revealing symptoms were asthenia, dry cough, and the deterioration of general conditions in 100%, 75%, and 63% of the patients, respectively. A biological inflammatory syndrome was found in 30% of the patients. Chest computed tomography (CT) scan, performed in 5 patients, showed features of COVID pneumonia with an average extent of damage of 55%. The rate of patients starting PD during the study period was comparable to that before the pandemic. Furthermore, we did not find a significant difference between the infected and the non-infected groups regarding the incidence of peritonitis, PD technique failure, and mortality (6.1 [0-1.46] vs 3.9 [0.15-0.64] deaths per 1000 patient-months. COVID-19 does not seem to have influenced the outcomes of our patients treated with PD even before the launch of mass immunization in our country. Thus, PD can be a great option for RRT in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic since many issues could be managed remotely to avoid regular hospital visits and contribute to maintaining social distancing, which is the cornerstone of breaking the chain of transmission of the novel virus.

Renal Amyloidosis: Epidemiological, Clinical, and Laboratory Profile in Adults from One Nephrology Center.

Background: Renal amyloidosis is one of the main differential diagnoses of nephrotic proteinuria in adults and the elderly. The aim of this study with the most important series in our country is to contribute to the epidemiological, clinical, and etiological study of the renal amyloidosis. Methods: In a retrospective study carried out between 1975 and 2019, 310 cases of histologically proven and typed renal amyloidosis were selected for this study. Results: There were 209 men and 101 women with a mean age of 53.8 ± 15.4 years (range, 17-84 years). Of the 310 cases, 255 (82.3%) were diagnosed with AA renal amyloidosis and 55 (17.7%) with non-AA amyloidosis. Infections were the main cause of AA amyloidosis, and tuberculosis was the most frequent etiology. The period from the onset of the underlying disease to diagnosis of the renal amyloidosis was an average of 177 months. The most frequent manifestations at the time of diagnosis were nephrotic syndrome (84%), chronic renal failure (30.3%), and end-stage renal disease (37.8%). After a medium follow-up of 16 months (range, 0-68 months), mortality occurred in 60 cases. Conclusions: Given the high frequency of AA amyloidosis in our country, awareness of the proper management of infectious and chronic inflammatory diseases remains a priority in reducing the occurrence of this serious disease.

[Left ventricular hypertrophy in hemodialysis patient: Prevalence, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic study and associated risk factors]. / Hypertrophie ventriculaire gauche chez les hémodialysés : prévalence, étude électrique, échographique et facteurs de risque.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy is the most prevalent cardiac abnormality in hemodialysis patients. The diagnosis of this abnormality is possible by electrocardiogram and/or echocardiography. Our study aimed to assess the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in hemodialysis patients and the accuracy of different electrocardiographic criteria. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional retrospective study including 60 hemodialysis patients between 2017 and 2018. A left ventricular mass index higher than 115g/m2 and 95g/m2 respectively in men and women defines echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy. We assessed left ventricular hypertrophy prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve of fourteen different electrocardiographic criteria for identification of left ventricular hypertrophy. RESULTS: This was a cohort of 60 patients composed of 27 men and 33 women with a mean age 52.6±15,8years. Hypertension was the most common cardiovascular risk factor (82 %). The prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy at echography was 65 %. Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy at electrocardiographic varied across the different criteria ranging from 5 % (R wave in DI) to 32 % (Perugia score). The highest left ventricular hypertrophy prevalence at electrocardiographic was found with the five following criteria: Perugia score (32 %), Peguero-Lo Presti index (28 %), Sokolow-Lyon index, Cornell index, Framingham-adjusted Cornell voltage (17 %). Sensitivity was ranged from 5 % (R in DI, Gubner-Ungerleider index, and product) to 41 % (Perugia score). The specificity of most criteria was ≥90 % except for the Perugia score (85 %). The sensitivity, specificity, postitive and negative productive values and left ventricular hypertrophy prevalence using the five most accurate criteria combined were respectively 48, 90, 70.28, 77.85 and 33 %. Hypertension, duration of HD, arteriovenous fistula, interdialytic weight gain, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin <9g/dL and hyperparathyroidism were significantly associated with left ventricular hypertrophy. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy detected by echocardiography was high. All electrocardiographic criteria had a low sensibility and a high specificity in the diagnostic of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy. To improve the accuracy of electrocardiographic criteria, it is necessary to combine several electrocardiographic criteria and not often focused on a single classic electrocardiographic index.

[Etiologies and prognostic factors of acute interstitial nephritis]. / Étiologies et facteurs pronostiques des néphropathies interstitielles aiguës.

INTRODUCTION: Acute interstitial nephritis represents a clinically and etiologically heterogeneous group of kidney diseases. The aim of our study was to explore the main causes of biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis and to identify predictive factors of renal outcome. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study which included patients with biopsy proven AIN, followed in our department during the period between 1980 and 2018. The non-recovery of kidney function or an estimated glomerular filtration rate˂60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were considered as a worse renal outcome. RESULTS: A total of 65 acute interstitial nephritis patients were enrolled. The mean age of patients was 41.3±16 years with a female predominance (78%). Drug-induced etiology was the most common (29%). The most frequent culprit drugs in our study were NSAID followed by antibiotics. The renal prognosis was unfavorable in 21 cases (32%). The independent predictive factors for renal outcome were : a percentage of sclerotic glomeruli greater than 15% (P=0.004), absence of interstitial edema (P˂0.001), non-use to corticosteroid therapy (P=0.02) and a delay in initiating corticosteroid therapy greater than 21 days (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Drugs currently represent the most common cause of acute interstitial nephritis. The renal prognosis is often favorable, but the progression can be towards chronic renal failure in the event of diagnostic and therapeutic delay. Our data suggest a beneficial influence of steroids on the outcome of acute interstitial nephritis.

Predictive factors of mortality in a tunisian cohort with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has decreased with the advent of immunosuppressive therapy and the development of hemodialysis. This study aims to evaluate the survival rate, factors of poor prognosis, and causes of death in SLE in a Tunisian series. The records of all SLE patients followed up in a single center during 1974-2014 were reviewed. The causes of death were identified. Prognostic factors of survival were analyzed by multivariate analysis using the comparison of the survival rates by the log-rank test. Two hundred ninety-nine patients with SLE were included (274 women, 25 men) aged meanly of 27.52 years at diagnosis. The death occurred in 50 cases (16.7%). The mean age at death was 28.46 years (14-69 years). The patient survival rates at 5, 10, and 20 years were 83.8%, 78.6%, and 56.7%, respectively. The leading causes of death were active SLE (50%) and infectious complications (36%). Independent factors of poor prognosis identified by multivariate analysis were myocarditis (P = 0.029), splenomegaly (P = 0.0015), and worsening of renal function (P = 0.004). Remission was identified as a protective factor (P = 0.047). Our study shows that renal disease remains the primary cause and the main predictor of death in SLE, which is consistent with the literature data.