[Automated breast ultrasound vs. handheld ultrasound: BI-RADS classification, duration of the examination and patient comfort]. / Automatisierter Brustultraschall vs. handgeführter Brustultraschall: BI-RADS-Einstufung, Untersuchungsdauer und Erlebnisqualität der Untersuchung.

PURPOSE: Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is a potentially valuable adjunct to mammography in breast cancer screening. The reliability and the inter-observer variability in the BI-RADS classification, compared to handheld ultrasound (US), as well as the duration of the examination and patient comfort have only been investigated in a limited number of papers to date. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, we examined 148 breasts of 76 patients with handheld US and ABUS. The ABUS data were evaluated separately by two investigators. Patient comfort was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: The inter-observer agreement for the BI-RADS classification among the two observers using ABUS was high (κ = 0,750), the agreement with handheld US was moderate. The sensitivity in the detection of breast cancer was 87.5 % for handheld US and 75 % for the ABUS evaluation by observer 1. The sensitivity was 87.5 % for the ABUS evaluation and 83 % for mammography by observer 2. The ABUS examination was rated as completely painless by 64 % of the patients. 25 % of the patients indicated minor pain, and 10 % indicated moderate pain. Handheld US was rated as completely painless by 66 % of the patients. 26 % of the patients indicated minor pain, and 8 % indicated moderate pain. CONCLUSION: ABUS examinations focusing on the BIRADS classification have low inter-observer variability, compared to handheld US. The sensitivity of ABUS did not differ significantly from handheld US.

[Skin complications of stonefish envenomation in 6 travellers returning from the Indo-Pacific maritime region]. / Complications cutanées des envenimations par poisson-pierre chez 6 voyageurs au retour de la région maritime indo-pacifique.

Stonefish (Synanceja verrucosa) sting has been known for a long time to be a medical hazard. It is a common cause of severe marine envenomation. Immediate complications (collapsus, pulmonary oedema) have been described extensively. Late complications (oedema, tissue necrosis) have not been studied in details although they are common and a cause of invalidity and pain. We have observed six travellers with complications of stonefish sting over a 10 year-period in our department. All the patients were coming back from the Indo-Pacific maritime region. They presented with cutaneous abcess (in one) or necrotic complications (foot ulcers in two, cellulitis in three) associated with painfull oedema in two and lymphangitis in three. Surgery has been performed in four patients, two of them undergoing many operations. Two had long term sequelae. Such complications could be avoided. Appropriate initial treatment (i.e., neutralization of the venom by hot water, disinfection, antivenom and antibioprophylaxis) seems to be able to reduce late complications. Antivenom is indicated in severe systemic manifestations which are life threatening and in case of crucial pains. Prevention is the most important part of therapy and relies on appropriate information of the travellers.