National Needs Assessment for a Pediatric Trauma Toolkit: General Requirements for Moderate- and High-Volume Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Optimal outcomes have been reported for children treated at pediatric trauma centers; however, most children are treated at nonpediatric trauma centers or nonpediatric general hospitals. Hospitals that are not verified or designated pediatric trauma centers may lack the training and level of comfort and skill when treating severely injured children. OBJECTIVE: This study focused on identifying common pediatric guidelines for standardization across all trauma centers to inform a pediatric trauma toolkit. METHODS: A needs assessment survey was developed highlighting the guidelines from an expert committee review. The purpose of the survey was to prioritize needed items for the development of a pediatric trauma toolkit. Professional trauma organizations distributed the survey to their respective memberships to ensure good representation of people who care for traumatically injured children and work in trauma centers. Deidentified survey results were analyzed with frequencies and descriptive statistics provided. Data were compared by hospital trauma verification level using a chi-square test. The value of p < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 303 people responded to the survey. The majority of respondents reported a high value in the creation of a pediatric trauma toolkit for the guidelines that were included. There was variability in the reported access to the guidelines, indicating a significant need for the toolkit development and dissemination. CONCLUSION: As expected, Level III centers reported the largest gaps in access to standardized pediatric guidelines and demonstrated high levels of interest and need.

Follow-Up Care Adherence After Hospital Discharge in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors associated with follow-up care adherence in children hospitalized because of traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: An urban level 1 children's hospital trauma registry was queried to identify patients (2-18 years) hospitalized with a TBI in 2013 to 2014. Chart reviewers assessed discharge summaries and follow-up instructions in 4 departments. MAIN MEASURES: Three levels of adherence-nonadherence, partial adherence, and full adherence-and their associations with care delivery, patient, and injury factors. RESULTS: In our population, 80% were instructed to follow up within the hospital network. These children were older and had more severe TBIs than those without follow-up instructions and those referred to outside providers. Of the 352 eligible patients, 19.9% were nonadherent, 27.3% were partially adherent, and 52.8% were fully adherent. Those recommended to follow up with more than 1 department had higher odds of partial adherence over nonadherence (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 5.8, 95% CI: 1.9-17.9); however, these patients were less likely to be fully adherent (AOR = 0.1; 95% CI: 0.1-0.3). Privately insured patients had a higher AOR of full adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 20% of children hospitalized for TBI never returned for outpatient follow-up and 27% missed appointments. Care providers need to educate families, coordinate service provision, and promote long-term monitoring.

Child maltreatment in U.S. emergency departments: Imaging and admissions.

OBJECTIVE: We report imaging and admission ratios for children with definitive and suggestive maltreatment in a national sample of emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: Using the 2012 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), we generated national estimates of ED visits for children <10 years with both definitive and suggestive maltreatment. Outcomes were admission/transfer ratios for children <10years and screening ratios by skeletal surveys and head computed tomography (CT) for children <2 years with suspected physical abuse. We compared hospitals with low, medium, and high pediatric ED volumes using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The 2012 national estimate of U.S. ED visits (children <10years) with definitive maltreatment is 14,457 (95% CI: 11,987-16,928). Suggestive child maltreatment was seen in an additional 103,392 (95% CI: 90,803-115,981) pediatric ED visits. After controlling for patient case mix, high volume hospitals had a significantly higher adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of admission/transfer among definitive cases (AOR=1.74, 95% CI: 1.08-2.81), and medium volume hospitals had a higher odds of admission/transfer among suggestive cases (AOR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.50) when compared with low volume hospitals. In hospitals with reliable reporting of imaging procedures, high volume hospitals reported skeletal surveys (age <2 years) significantly more often than low volume hospitals, AOR=3.32 (95% CI: 1.25-8.84); the AORs for head CT did not differ by hospital volume. CONCLUSIONS: Low volume hospitals were less likely to screen by skeletal survey, but head CT ratios were not affected by ED volume. Low volume hospitals were also less likely to admit or transfer.

Standardizing the initial resuscitation of the trauma patient with the Primary Assessment Completion Tool using video review.

BACKGROUND: Major trauma resuscitations at pediatric trauma centers have an elevated risk for error because of their high acuity and relatively low frequency. The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) treatment paradigm was established to improve the management of trauma patients during the initial resuscitation phase and has been shown to improve outcomes through a standardized approach. The goal of this quality improvement project was to decrease assessment physician variability and improve the compliance with the ATLS primary assessment for major resuscitations. METHODS: A video review tool was developed to score the assessment physician on completion of the primary survey components using ATLS format. Interrater reliability and content validity were established for the tool. Data were collected through video review of the trauma response team in the emergency department for all Level 1 trauma alert activations with general consent. Chi-square and regression analyses were used to evaluate the data at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year from the baseline period. RESULTS: A total of 142 patient videos were scored between July 28, 2015, and August 1, 2016. Eleven patients were reviewed during the baseline period, and only 9.1% of the total scores were ≥85. Thirty days following project implementation, 37.5% were ≥ 85. Six months following project implementation, 64.4% scored ≥85. One year following project implementation, 91.5% scored ≥85. These were statistically significant changes (p < .0001) with less variability over time. CONCLUSION: Effective leadership using a standardized approach during the trauma resuscitation has been found to have a positive effect on task completion and the overall functioning of the trauma team. This focused quality improvement project improved compliance with ATLS format and decreased variability by the assessment physician, potentially improving patient safety and outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level IV.

Establishing Standards for Trauma Nursing Education: The Central Ohio Trauma System's Approach.

Trauma nursing requires mastering a highly specialized body of knowledge. Expert nursing care is expected to be offered throughout the hospital continuum, yet identifying the necessary broad-based objectives for nurses working within this continuum has often been difficult to define. Trauma nurse leaders and educators from 7 central and southeastern Ohio trauma centers and 1 regional trauma organization convened to establish an approach to standardizing trauma nursing education from a regional perspective. Forty-two trauma nursing educational objectives were identified. The Delphi method was used to narrow the list to 3 learning objectives to serve as the framework for a regional trauma nursing education guideline. Although numerous trauma nursing educational needs were identified across the continuum of care, a lack of clearly defined standards exists. Recognizing and understanding the educational preparation and defined standards required for nurses providing optimal trauma care are vital for a positive impact on patient outcomes. This regional trauma nursing education guideline is a novel model and can be used to assist trauma care leaders in standardizing trauma education within their hospital, region, or state. The use of this model may also lead to the identification of gaps within trauma educational systems.

Managing moderately injured pediatric patients without immediate surgeon presence: 10 years later.

PURPOSE: Beginning in 2003, the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physician replaced the surgeon as the team leader for all level II trauma resuscitations at a busy pediatric trauma center. The purpose was to review the outcomes 10 years after implementing this practice change. METHODS: Trauma registry data for all level II activations requiring admission were extracted for the 21 months (April 1, 2001-December 31, 2002) prior to policy change (period 1, **n=627) and compared to the admitted patients from the 10 subsequent years (2003-2013; period 2, n=2694). Data included demographics, length of stay (LOS), injury severity score (ISS), readmissions, complications, and mortality. RESULTS: Mean ISS scores for admitted patients during period 1 (8.5) were higher than during period 2 (7.8). During period 1, 53.6% of patients underwent abdominal CT versus 41.8% in period 2 (p<.001), and the median ED LOS was 135 versus 191 minutes in period 2. From 2000 to 2003, 91% of patients seen as level II trauma alerts were admitted compared to 56.6% of patients in period 2 (p<0.001). There were no missed abdominal injuries identified, and readmission rate was low. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that level II trauma resuscitations can be safely evaluated and managed without immediate surgeon presence. Although ED LOS increased, admission rate and CT scan usage decreased significantly without an increase in missed injuries.

A comparison of paper documentation to electronic documentation for trauma resuscitations at a level I pediatric trauma center.

INTRODUCTION: Although the electronic medical record reduces errors and improves patient safety, most emergency departments continue to use paper documentation for trauma resuscitations. The purpose of this study was to compare the completeness of paper documentation with that of electronic documentation for trauma resuscitations. METHODS: The setting was a level I pediatric trauma center where 100% electronic documentation was achieved in August 2012. A random sample of trauma resuscitations documented by paper (n=200) was compared with a random sample of trauma resuscitations documented electronically (n=200) to identify the presence or absence of the documentation of 11 key data elements for each trauma resuscitation. RESULTS: The electronic documentation more frequently captured 5 data elements: time of team activation (100% vs 85%, P<.00), primary assessment (94% vs 88%, P<.036), arrival time of attending physician (98% vs 93.5%, P<.026), intravenous fluid volume in the emergency department (94% vs 88%, P<.036), and disposition (100% vs 89.5%, P<.00). The paper documentation more often recorded one data element: volume of intravenous fluids administered prior to arrival (92.5% vs 100%, P<.00). No statistical difference in documentation rates was found for 5 data elements: vital signs, treatment by emergency medical personnel, arrival time in the emergency department, and level of trauma alert activation. DISCUSSION: Electronic documentation produced superior records of pediatric trauma resuscitations compared with paper documentation. Because the electronic medical record improves patient safety, it should be adopted as the standard documentation method for all trauma resuscitations.

A multicenter prospective analysis of pediatric trauma activation criteria routinely used in addition to the six criteria of the American College of Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons has defined six minimum activation criteria (ACS-6) for the highest level of trauma activations at trauma centers. The verification criteria also allow for the inclusion of additional criteria at the institution's discretion. The purpose of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the ACS-6 as well as commonly used activation criteria to evaluate overtriage and undertriage rates for pediatric trauma team activation. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected at nine pediatric trauma centers to examine 29 commonly used activation criteria. Patients meeting any of these criteria were evaluated for the use of high-level trauma resuscitation resources according to an expert consensus list. Patients requiring a resource but not meeting any activation criteria were included to evaluate undertriage rates. RESULTS: During the 1-year study, a total of 656 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 8 years, a median Injury Severity Score of 14, and mortality of 11%. Using all criteria, 55% of patients would have been overtriaged and 9% would have been undertriaged. If only the ACS-6 were used, 24% of patients would have been overtriaged and 16% would have been undertriaged. Among activation criteria with more than 10 patients, those most predictive of using a high-level resource were a gunshot wound to the abdomen (92%), blood given before arrival (83%), traumatic arrest (83%), tachycardia/poor perfusion (83%), and age-appropriate hypotension (77%). The addition of tachycardia/poor perfusion and pretrauma center resuscitation with greater than 40 mL/kg results in eight criteria with an overtriage of 39% and an undertriage of 10.5%. CONCLUSION: The ACS-6 provides a reliable overtriage or undertriage rate for pediatric patients. The inclusion of two additional criteria can further improve these rates while maintianing a simplified triage list for children.

The role of the trauma nurse leader in a pediatric trauma center.

The trauma nurse leader role was developed by a group of trauma surgeons, hospital administrators, and emergency department and trauma leaders at Nationwide Children's Hospital who recognized the need for the development of a core group of nurses who provided expert trauma care. The intent was to provide an experienced group of nurses who could identify and resolve issues in the trauma room. Through increased education, exposure, mentoring, and professional development, the trauma nurse leader role has become an essential part of the specialized pediatric trauma care provided at Nationwide Children's Hospital.

Variation in DVT prophylaxis for adolescent trauma patients: a survey of the Society of Trauma Nurses.

We performed a survey of the Society of Trauma Nurses to explore current practice patterns for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in adolescent trauma patients and analyzed responses from 133 institutions. The majority of adult prophylaxis protocols include older adolescents. Only 41% of adult programs identified patient age as "very" important in prophylaxis decision making. Pelvic fracture, spinal cord injury, and expected immobilization were rated most important. Pharmacologic prophylaxis in 11- to 15-year-olds was infrequent, with 60% of centers using never or rarely. Use was much higher but variable among older adolescents. No consensus on deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in adolescent trauma emerged from our survey.

Pediatric sledding trauma: avoiding the collision.

During 2006-2007, a midwest pediatric level I trauma center and affiliated urgent care centers treated 181 children for sledding-related trauma. Twenty-one children required hospitalization for injuries. Some children sustained injuries that were severe including cervical fracture with spinal cord injury, splenic laceration, pulmonary contusion, and head injury. The most frequent mechanism of injury was collision with an object or a person. Although most injuries are minor, some are serious and may have life-changing outcomes. Sledding in unobstructed areas may decrease injuries. An increased public awareness of the risks of serious injury associated with sledding is needed.

Pediatric trauma nursing education requirements: a national overview.

This study describes current trauma nursing education requirements and nursing perception for additional pediatric trauma education. A web-based survey was electronically distributed to members of Society of Trauma Nurses. Overall, a lack of consistent standards across the United States for what constitutes pediatric trauma education was noted. Many hospital trauma programs expend time and money developing their own hospital course. Strong support exists for the development of an additional pediatric trauma course with a skills station. Basic concepts of primary/secondary survey, airway management, and fluid management for hypovolemic shock should be a high priority within this curriculum.

History and development of trauma registry: lessons from developed to developing countries.

BACKGROUND: A trauma registry is an integral component of modern comprehensive trauma care systems. Trauma registries have not been established in most developing countries, and where they exist are often rudimentary and incomplete. This review describes the role of trauma registries in the care of the injured, and discusses how lessons from developed countries can be applied toward their design and implementation in developing countries. METHODS: A detailed review of English-language articles on trauma registry was performed using MEDLINE and CINAHL. In addition, relevant articles from non-indexed journals were identified with Google Scholar. RESULTS: The history and development of trauma registries and their role in modern trauma care are discussed. Drawing from past and current experience, guidelines for the design and implementation of trauma registries are given, with emphasis on technical and logistic factors peculiar to developing countries. CONCLUSION: Improvement in trauma care depends on the establishment of functioning trauma care systems, of which a trauma registry is a crucial component. Hospitals and governments in developing countries should be encouraged to establish trauma registries using proven cost-effective strategies.

A leap in faith: the impact of removing the surgeon from the level II trauma response.

BACKGROUND: Limitation of resident work hours has created the need to explore alternatives to surgeon presence during initial assessment and resuscitation for selected life-threatening injuries in children. We recently eliminated the requirement for surgeon presence during Level II alerts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of this change on patient care. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of trauma alert activity was performed using data from our trauma registry. In March 2003, responsibility for level II alerts was transferred from the pediatric surgeons (PSs) to the Emergency Department (ED) physicians. We compared the activity in the 18-month period before this change (period 1; n = 627) to that afterward (period 2; n = 587). Outcome measures included injury severity score, emergency department length of stay, missed injuries, abdominal computed tomography use, and mortality. Data were analyzed using log-rank statistic, chi2, or t test, where appropriate, with significance level at P < .05. RESULTS: During the entire study period, 1499 patients met the trauma alert activation criteria of which 1214 (81%) were level II alerts. The mean injury severity score for period 1 (8.5 +/- 7.3 SD) was similar to period 2 (9.0 +/- 7.1 SD). When ED physicians replaced PS for Level II alerts, ED length of stay increased from 135 minutes to 165 minutes (P < .001). In addition, the use of abdominal computed tomography was significantly decreased (53.6% vs 42.6%; P < .001). However, there were no missed injuries and no significant differences in the rate of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: When ED physicians replaced PS for Level II alerts, trauma room length of stay was increased, but use of abdominal imaging was decreased with no differences in rate of missed injury or mortality. Emergency Department physicians can safely replace PS during Level II alerts. These findings may be useful to institutions experiencing surgical workforce limitations for trauma alerts.

The risk of child abuse in infants and toddlers with lower extremity injuries.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the risk of child abuse in children younger than 18 months admitted to a pediatric trauma service with lower extremity injuries. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective case series of children admitted to a regional pediatric trauma center with lower extremity injuries from 1998 to 2002 (n = 5497) was performed. Factors analyzed included age, injuries, and injury mechanism. RESULTS: Among 5497 trauma patients, the incidence of abuse was 104 (2%) of 4942 children 18 months or older and 175(32%) of 555 children younger than 18 months (odds ratio [OR], 21.4 +/- 2.9, P < .001). There were 1252 (23%) patients with lower extremity injuries in the entire sample, and 66 of these were younger than 18 months. In the extremity trauma group, for patients 18 months or older, 16 (1%) of 1186 were abused compared with 44 (67%) of 66 patients younger than 18 months (OR, 146 +/- 53, P < .001). Among all trauma patients younger than 18 months, 41 of 55 lower extremity fractures were linked to abuse, whereas 134 of 500 other injuries were caused by abuse (OR, 8.0 +/- 2.6, P < .001). Among the 41 abuse-related fractures, femur fracture was the most common (22), followed by tibia fracture (14). CONCLUSIONS: Among children 18 months or older, abuse is an uncommon cause of lower extremity trauma. In children younger than 18 months, lower extremity injuries, particularly fractures, are highly associated with child abuse. Clinicians must thoroughly investigate lower extremity injuries in this age group.