Comparison of Time Within Therapeutic Range Using Anti-Factor Xa Versus Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Monitoring of Unfractionated Heparin in Children.

OBJECTIVE: To compare unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring using time in therapeutic range of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) versus anti-factor Xa activity (anti-Xa) in children. METHODS: This retrospective chart review, with data between October 2015 and October 2019, included pediatric patients younger than 18 years on therapeutic UFH infusion with aPTT or anti-Xa monitoring. Patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, dialysis, concomitant anticoagulants, prophylactic UFH, no stated goal, and UFH administered for less than 12 hours were excluded. The primary outcome compared the percentage of time in therapeutic range between aPTT and anti-Xa. Secondary outcomes included time to first therapeutic value, UFH infusion rates, mean rate adjustments, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were included, with 33 aPTT patients and 32 anti-Xa patients, representing 39 UFH orders in each group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, with an overall mean age of 1.4 years and mean weight of 6.7 kg. The anti-Xa cohort demonstrated a statistically significantly higher percentage of time in therapeutic range compared with the aPTT group (50.3% vs 26.9%, p = 0.002). The anti-Xa group also demonstrated a trend toward decreased time to first therapeutic value compared with aPTT (14 vs 23.2 hours, p = 0.12). Two patients in each group experienced new or worsening thrombosis. Six patients in the aPTT cohort experienced bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated greater time was spent within therapeutic range for children receiving UFH monitored with anti-Xa compared with aPTT. Future studies should assess clinical outcomes in a larger population.

Corrected QT Interval Prolongation in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients Receiving Methadone.

OBJECTIVES: Methadone is often used in pediatric patients to prevent or treat opioid withdrawal after prolonged sedation. Prolonged corrected QT interval is an important adverse effect of methadone because it can progress to torsades de pointes, a potentially fatal dysrhythmia. The prevalence of corrected QT interval prolongation and contributing risk factors are not well defined in hospitalized pediatric patients receiving methadone. The study purpose was to identify the frequency and risk factors of corrected QT interval prolongation in hospitalized pediatric patients receiving methadone. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic pediatric hospital, University of California Davis Children's Hospital, Sacramento, CA. PATIENTS: Cohort of 89 pediatric patients (birth to 18 yr) who received at least one dose of methadone while hospitalized. INTERVENTIONS: Retrospective data over 7.5 years were obtained from the electronic health record. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: From the cohort, 45 patients (50.6%) had documented corrected QT interval prolongation (≥ 450 ms) during the study period. No episodes of torsades de pointes were identified. In univariate analyses, higher maximum methadone doses were associated with a prolonged corrected QT interval (0.98 vs 0.59 mg/kg/d; odds ratio, 2.56; 1.15-5.70). Corrected QT interval prolongation occurred more frequently in patients with cardiac disease (63% vs 41%; p = 0.10). No factors were statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized pediatric patients receiving methadone, corrected QT interval prolongation was common, but no episodes of torsades de pointes were documented. Risk factors that have been identified in adults were not associated with prolongation in our study population.

Dexmedetomidine Use in Critically Ill Children With Acute Respiratory Failure.

OBJECTIVE: Care of critically ill children includes sedation but current therapies are suboptimal. To describe dexmedetomidine use in children supported on mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure clinical trial. SETTING: Thirty-one PICUs. PATIENTS: Data from 2,449 children; 2 weeks to 17 years old. INTERVENTIONS: Sedation practices were unrestrained in the usual care arm. Patients were categorized as receiving dexmedetomidine as a primary sedative, secondary sedative, periextubation agent, or never prescribed. Dexmedetomidine exposure and sedation and clinical profiles are described. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 1,224 usual care patients, 596 (49%) received dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine as a primary sedative patients (n = 138; 11%) were less critically ill (Pediatric Risk of Mortality III-12 score median, 6 [interquartile range, 3-11]) and when compared with all other cohorts, experienced more episodic agitation. In the intervention group, time in sedation target improved from 28% to 50% within 1 day of initiating dexmedetomidine as a primary sedative. Dexmedetomidine as a secondary sedative usual care patients (n = 280; 23%) included more children with severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome or organ failure. Dexmedetomidine as a secondary sedative patients experienced more inadequate pain (22% vs 11%) and sedation (31% vs 16%) events. Dexmedetomidine as a periextubation agent patients (n = 178; 15%) were those known to not tolerate an awake, intubated state and experienced a shorter ventilator weaning process (2.1 vs 2.3 d). CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the use of dexmedetomidine as a primary agent in low criticality patients offering the benefit of rapid achievement of targeted sedation levels. Dexmedetomidine as a secondary agent does not appear to add benefit. The use of dexmedetomidine to facilitate extubation in children intolerant of an awake, intubated state may abbreviate ventilator weaning. These data support a broader armamentarium of pediatric critical care sedation.