Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in a Safety Net Hospital: Opportunities for Improvement.

Background: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a safe and cost-effective transitional care approach administered via different delivery models. No standards exist for appropriate OPAT program staffing. We examined outcomes of patients receiving OPAT via different care models to identify strategies to improve safety while reducing health care overuse. Methods: Retrospective demographic, clinical, and outcome data of patients discharged with OPAT were reviewed in 2 periods (April-June 2021 and January-March 2022; ie, when staffing changed) and stratified by care model: self-administered OPAT, health care OPAT, and skilled nursing facility OPAT. Results: Of 342 patients, 186 (54%) received OPAT in 2021 and 156 (46%) in 2022. Hospital length of stay rose from 12.4 days to 14.3 in 2022. In a Cox proportional hazards regression model, visits to the emergency department (ED) within 30 days of OPAT initiation (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.13-2.73; P = .01) and readmissions (hazard ratio, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.22-4.49; P = .01) increased in 2022 vs 2021, corresponding to decreases in OPAT team staffing. Higher readmissions in the 2022 cohort were for reasons unrelated to OPAT (P = .01) while readmissions related to OPAT did not increase (P = .08). Conclusions: In a well-established OPAT program, greater health care utilization-length of stay, ED visits, and readmissions-were seen during periods of higher staff turnover and attrition. Rather than blunt metrics such as ED visits and readmissions, which are influenced by multiple factors besides OPAT, our findings suggest the need to develop OPAT-specific outcome measures as a quality assessment tool and to establish optimal OPAT program staffing ratios.

Safety and Efficacy of Indomethacin for Reducing Chest Tube Duration After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.

Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) contain a boxed warning for use in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery due to increased risk of thrombotic events, but recent research has challenged the assumption that these risks are a class effect. One anecdotal indication for NSAIDs in CABG is reducing chest tube output. Objective: The primary objective of this retrospective study was to determine whether indomethacin was associated with reduced duration of chest tube insertion after CABG surgery, defined as total chest tube duration in controls versus duration of chest tube insertion after the first dose of indomethacin in the treatment group. Secondary objectives were comparisons of daily reductions in chest tube output volume, length of stay, and safety between groups. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center case-control review, adult patients who received indomethacin after CABG were matched 1:1 to control patients based on age, sex, concomitant valve surgery, and, when possible, diabetes status. Results: Thirty-two patients were included. The mean age was 56 years and 75% were men. The primary outcome measure was 94 hours among control patients and 82.8 hours among indomethacin patients (P = 0.041). Insignificant mean reductions in daily chest tube output were observed prior to and after indomethacin initiation (38.7 vs 87.7 mL/day, P > 0.05). Conclusion: In this small, single-center study, indomethacin appeared safe and possibly effective for reducing chest tube duration after CABG surgery. Future large, prospective, randomized studies should be conducted to confirm the results.

Minimal impact of selective susceptibility reporting on the use of piperacillin-tazobactam for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella bacteremia.

Selective cascade reporting of antibiotic susceptibilities did not have a significant impact on de-escalation from piperacillin-tazobactam (PT), duration of PT use, length of stay, or rates of acute kidney injury and Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with positive monomicrobial blood cultures with either Escherichia coli or Klebsiella spp.