Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Future Oncol ; 16(36): 3045-3060, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32885666

RESUMO

Aim: Assessing treatment patterns, outcomes and clinical characteristics in advanced renal cell carcinoma clinical practice. Materials & methods: A US cross-sectional physician survey conducted February-September 2019. Results: Surveyed physicians reported first-line treatment of 445 patients involving tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy (51.0%), immuno-oncology (IO/IO combination) therapy (25.8%) or other regimens (23.1%). A total of 60.9% had physician-assessed IMDC risk. Of these 61.9, 50.9 and 27.6% of patients with favorable, intermediate and poor risk, respectively, received tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy. A total of 16.7, 26.9 and 34.5% of patients with favorable, intermediate or poor risk received IO/IO combination therapy. Complete/partial responses (∼35% patients) remained comparable across first-line treatments. Conclusion: Guideline-recommended therapies are not widely prescribed. Many patients experienced poor clinical outcomes highlighting a need for more effective treatments.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Oncologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Future Oncol ; 16(15): 1013-1030, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32326746

RESUMO

Aim: To analyze real-world data relating to treatment decision-making in stage III-IV ovarian cancer (OC). Materials & methods: Real world data were collected from a survey of physicians and their patients (n = 2413) across Europe and the USA in 2017-2018. Results: 49% had stage IVb disease. 39, 54 and 7% of patients received first-line (1L), second-line, or 7% third-line or later treatment. In the 1L (ongoing or completed), 93% received platinum-containing regimens, 26% bevacizumab-containing regimens and 1% a PARP inhibitor-containing regimen. In 1L maintenance treatment, 81% received bevacizumab, 17% platinum-containing treatments and 6% a PARP inhibitor. Conclusion: The most common 1L treatment for advanced ovarian cancer was platinum-containing chemotherapy. Of those receiving 1L maintenance therapy, 70-99% (across countries) received targeted therapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Terapia Combinada , Gerenciamento Clínico , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...