RESUMO
Background: Desmopressin (1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin [DDAVP]) has demonstrated efficacy as a treatment option for patients with inherited bleeding disorders. Because of individuals' variable response to the medication, it is recommended to complete a challenge to document appropriate hemostatic response to the medication before recommending its use prior to surgical procedures or treatment of bleeding symptoms. The project aimed to reduce the errors in hemostatic response assessments for patients with bleeding disorders undergoing a DDAVP challenge (process outcome), particularly timing and number of blood samples drawn, from an error rate baseline of 36% to 0% by December 2021 and sustained for one year. Method: Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology was employed for this qualitative improvement initiative. Interventions designed and implemented included: an order set with medication doses and corresponding laboratory orders as clinically indicated for the bleeding disorder indication, clinical procedure guidelines for infusion nurses to follow, hemostasis nurse coordination of appointments with patients, and family education. Results: Baseline data on 22 patients who completed a DDAVP challenge demonstrated a 36% error rate not involving doses of medication administered. Errors encountered included improper timing of laboratory draw after DDAVP administration, incomplete laboratory evaluation, laboratory results displayed incorrectly due to testing orders released at once instead of in a sequential manner. These interventions resulted in a reduction of DDAVP challenge errors to 0% that were sustained for one year. Conclusion: Improvement in procedural medication administration and appropriate laboratory evaluation of patients undergoing a DDAVP challenge leads to a complete and reliable assessment of hemostatic response following medication administration.
RESUMO
Adult, female rats given irregular, limited access to chocolate develop binge-eating behaviour with normal bodyweight and compulsive/perseverative and impulsive behaviours similar to those in binge-eating disorder. We investigated whether (a) dysregulated central nervous system dopaminergic and opioidergic systems are part of the psychopathology of binge-eating and (b) these neurotransmitter systems may mediate the actions of drugs ameliorating binge-eating disorder psychopathology. Binge-eating produced a 39% reduction of striatal D1 receptors with 22% and 23% reductions in medial and lateral caudate putamen and a 22% increase of striatal µ-opioid receptors. There was no change in D1 receptor density in nucleus accumbens, medial prefrontal cortex or dorsolateral frontal cortex, striatal D2 receptors and dopamine reuptake transporter sites, or µ-opioid receptors in frontal cortex. There were no changes in ligand affinities. The concentrations of monoamines, metabolites and estimates of dopamine (dopamine/dihydroxyphenylacetic acid ratio) and serotonin/5-hydroxyindolacetic acid ratio turnover rates were unchanged in striatum and frontal cortex. However, turnover of dopamine and serotonin in the hypothalamus was increased ~20% and ~15%, respectively. Striatal transmission via D1 receptors is decreased in binge-eating rats while µ-opioid receptor signalling may be increased. These changes are consistent with the attenuation of binge-eating by lisdexamfetamine, which increases catecholaminergic neurotransmission, and nalmefene, a µ-opioid antagonist.