Tolerability and efficacy of dorzolamide versus acetazolamide added to timolol.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of dorzolamide versus acetazolamide when added to once daily 0.5% timolol maleate ophthalmic gel forming solution (timolol gel). METHODS: This was a randomized, double-masked, multicenter, active-controlled, parallel group study of 215 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Following a two-week treatment period with timolol gel, patients with IOP > or = 22 mm Hg and who tolerated one week of acetazolamide 250-mg q.i.d. either were randomized to acetazolamide or dorzolamide 2% three times daily for 12 weeks. RESULTS: In 155 randomized patients (dorzolamide, N = 80, acetazolamide, N = 75), compared to the dorzolamide, acetazolamide had a statistically greater number of systemic adverse events (dorzolamide 50%, acetazolamide 75%, p = 0.001), adverse events associated with carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (CAI) therapy (dorzolamide 26%, acetazolamide 53%, p < 0.001) and discontinuations due to CAI adverse experiences (dorzolamide 8%, acetazolamide 24%, p = 0.007). Intent to treat analysis found that changes from baseline in IOP were similar at both troughs (dorzolamide 1.4 +/- 0.46 mm Hg, acetazolamide 0.8 +/- 0.47 mm Hg, p = 0.386). However, per-protocol analysis found statistically improved pressure control with acetazolamide (0.1 +/- 0.42 mm Hg) compared to dorzolamide (1.9 +/- 0.43 mm Hg) (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a greater incidence of systemic and CAI adverse experiences and discontinuations due to acetazolamide compared to dorzolamide.

A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of 0.5% timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution QD and 0.5% levobunolol hydrochloride BID in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma.

The purpose of this study was to compare the ocular hypotensive efficacy and tolerability of 0.5% timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution (timolol gel) and 0.5% levobunolol hydrochloride (levobunolol). This was a randomized, double-masked, multi-center, active-controlled, 2-period, crossover study. After a 3-week, single-masked placebo run-in phase, patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma and an intraocular pressure (IOP) > or = 22 mmHg were randomized to receive timolol gel QD or levobunolol BID for 6 weeks followed by a 3-week, placebo washout period. Patients were then crossed over to the alternate treatment for 6 weeks. IOP and heart rate (HR) were measured at 3 and 6 weeks after the start of therapy with either timolol gel or levobunolol. Of 133 patients randomized, 116 received both treatments. Timolol gel QD was comparable to levobunolol BID in reducing trough and peak IOP. At trough, HR was marginally increased with timolol gel and was decreased with levobunolol (p = < 0.001). At peak, HR was decreased with both treatments, but the decrease was significantly less with timolol gel than with levobunolol (p = 0.049). Significantly more patients experienced at least one adverse event (p = 0.024), adverse events related to special senses (p = 0.002), and burning and stinging (p < 0.001) with levobunolol compared to timolol gel. The study demonstrates that timolol gel QD has IOP-lowering effects comparable to those of levobunolol BID with fewer adverse experiences and less effect on HR.