Effects of the selective orexin-2 receptor antagonist JNJ-48816274 on sleep initiated in the circadian wake maintenance zone: a randomised trial.

The effects of orexinergic peptides are diverse and are mediated by orexin-1 and orexin-2 receptors. Antagonists that target both receptors have been shown to promote sleep initiation and maintenance. Here, we investigated the role of the orexin-2 receptor in sleep regulation in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover clinical trial using two doses (20 and 50 mg) of a highly selective orexin-2 receptor antagonist (2-SORA) (JNJ-48816274). We used a phase advance model of sleep disruption where sleep initiation is scheduled in the circadian wake maintenance zone. We assessed objective and subjective sleep parameters, pharmacokinetic profiles and residual effects on cognitive performance in 18 healthy male participants without sleep disorders. The phase advance model alone (placebo condition) resulted in disruption of sleep at the beginning of the sleep period compared to baseline sleep (scheduled at habitual time). Compared to placebo, both doses of JNJ-48816274 significantly increased total sleep time, REM sleep duration and sleep efficiency, and reduced latency to persistent sleep, sleep onset latency, and REM latency. All night EEG spectral power density for both NREM and REM sleep were unaffected by either dose. Participants reported significantly better quality of sleep and feeling more refreshed upon awakening following JNJ-48816274 compared to placebo. No significant residual effects on objective performance measures were observed and the compound was well tolerated. In conclusion, the selective orexin-2 receptor antagonist JNJ-48816274 rapidly induced sleep when sleep was scheduled earlier in the circadian cycle and improved self-reported sleep quality without impact on waking performance.

The effects of FAAH inhibition on the neural basis of anxiety-related processing in healthy male subjects: a randomized clinical trial.

Acute pharmacological inhibition of the anandamide-degrading enzyme, fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), prolongs the regulatory effects of endocannabinoids and reverses the stress-induced anxiety state in a cannabinoid receptor-dependent manner. However, the neural systems underlying this modulation are poorly understood. A single site, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study was conducted with 43 subjects assigned to receive once daily dosing of either placebo (n = 21) or JNJ-42165279 (100 mg) (n = 22) for 4 consecutive days. Pharmacodynamic effects were assessed on the last day of dosing and included evaluation of brain activation patterns using BOLD fMRI during an (1) emotion face-processing task, (2) inspiratory breathing load task, and (3) fear conditioning and extinction task. JNJ-42165279 attenuated activation in the amygdala, bilateral anterior cingulate, and bilateral insula during the emotion face-processing task consistent with effects previously observed with anxiolytic agents. Higher levels of anandamide were associated with greater attenuation in bilateral anterior cingulate and left insula. JNJ-42165279 increased the activation during anticipation of an aversive interoceptive event in the anterior cingulate and bilateral anterior insula and right inferior frontal cortex. JNJ-42165279 did not affect fear conditioning or within-session extinction learning as evidenced by a lack of differences on a subjective and neural circuit level. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that JNJ-42165279 at this dose shares some effects with existing anxiolytic agents in dampening response to emotional stimuli but not responses to conditioned fear.

Characterization of JNJ-42847922, a Selective Orexin-2 Receptor Antagonist, as a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Insomnia.

Dual orexin receptor antagonists have been shown to promote sleep in various species, including humans. Emerging research indicates that selective orexin-2 receptor (OX2R) antagonists may offer specificity and a more adequate sleep profile by preserving normal sleep architecture. Here, we characterized JNJ-42847922 ([5-(4,6-dimethyl-pyrimidin-2-yl)-hexahydro-pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrol-2-yl]-(2-fluoro-6-[1,2,3]triazol-2-yl-phenyl)-methanone), a high-affinity/potent OX2R antagonist. JNJ-42847922 had an approximate 2-log selectivity ratio versus the human orexin-1 receptor. Ex vivo receptor binding studies demonstrated that JNJ-42847922 quickly occupied OX2R binding sites in the rat brain after oral administration and rapidly cleared from the brain. In rats, single oral administration of JNJ-42847922 (3-30 mg/kg) during the light phase dose dependently reduced the latency to non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and prolonged NREM sleep time in the first 2 hours, whereas REM sleep was minimally affected. The reduced sleep onset and increased sleep duration were maintained upon 7-day repeated dosing (30 mg/kg) with JNJ-42847922, then all sleep parameters returned to baseline levels following discontinuation. Although the compound promoted sleep in wild-type mice, it had no effect in OX2R knockout mice, consistent with a specific OX2R-mediated sleep response. JNJ-42847922 did not increase dopamine release in rat nucleus accumbens or produce place preference in mice after subchronic conditioning, indicating that the compound lacks intrinsic motivational properties in contrast to zolpidem. In a single ascending dose study conducted in healthy subjects, JNJ-42847922 increased somnolence and displayed a favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profile for a sedative/hypnotic, thus emerging as a promising candidate for further clinical development for the treatment of insomnia.

Visual, cognitive, and language assessments at 39 months: a follow-up study of children fed formulas containing long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids to 1 year of age.

OBJECTIVE: Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) are long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids found in breast milk and recently added to infant formulas. Their importance in infant nutrition was recognized by the rapid accretion of these fatty acids in the brain during the first postnatal year, reports of enhanced intellectual development in breastfed children, and recognition of the physiologic importance of DHA in visual and neural systems from studies in animal models. These considerations led to clinical trials to evaluate whether infant formulas that are supplemented with DHA or both DHA and ARA would enhance visual and cognitive development or whether conversion of linoleic acid and alpha-linolenic acid, the essential fatty acid precursors of ARA and DHA, respectively, at the levels found in infant formulas is sufficient to support adequately visual and cognitive development. Visual and cognitive development were not different with supplementation in some studies, whereas other studies reported benefits of adding DHA or both DHA and ARA to formula. One of the first trials with term infants that were fed formula supplemented with DHA or both DHA and ARA evaluated growth, visual acuity (Visual Evoked Potential; Acuity Card Procedure), mental and motor development (Bayley Scales of Infant Development), and early language development (MacArthur Communicative Developmental Inventories). Growth, visual acuity, and mental and motor development were not different among the 3 formula groups or between the breastfed and formula-fed infants in the first year of life. At 14 months of age, infants who were fed the formula with DHA but no ARA had lower vocabulary production and comprehension scores than infants who were fed the unsupplemented control formula or who were breastfed, respectively. The present follow-up study evaluated IQ, receptive and expressive vocabulary, visual-motor function, and visual acuity of children from the original trial when they reached 39 months of age. METHODS: Infants were randomized within 1 week after birth and fed a control formula (n = 65), one containing DHA (n = 65), or one containing both ARA and DHA (n = 66) to 1 year of age. A comparison group (n = 80) was exclusively breastfed for at least 3 months after which the infants continued to be exclusively breastfed or were supplemented with and/or weaned to infant formula. At 39 months, standard tests of IQ (Stanford Binet IQ), receptive vocabulary (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised), expressive vocabulary (mean length of utterance), visual-motor function (Beery Visual-Motor Index), and visual acuity (Acuity Card Procedure) were administered. Growth, red blood cell fatty acid levels, and morbidity also were evaluated. RESULTS: Results were analyzed using analysis of variance or linear regression models. The regression model for IQ, receptive and expressive language, and the visual-motor index controlled for site, birth weight, sex, maternal education, maternal age, and the child's age at testing. The regression model for visual acuity controlled for site only. A variable selection model also identified which of 22 potentially prognostic variables among different categories (feeding groups, the child and family demographics, indicators of illness since birth, and environment) were most influential for IQ and expressive vocabulary. A total of 157 (80%) of the 197 infants studied at 12 months participated in this follow-up study. Characteristics of the families were representative of US families with children up to 5 years of age, and there were no differences in the demographic or family characteristics among the randomized formula groups. As expected, the formula and breastfed groups differed in ethnicity, marital status, parental education, and the prevalence of smoking. Sex, ethnicity, gestational age at birth, and birth weight for those who participated at 39 months did not differ from those who did not. The 12-month Bayley mental and motor scores and 14-month vocabulary scores of the children who participated also were were not different from those who did not. At 39 months, IQ, receptive and expressive language, visual-motor function, and visual acuity were not different among the 3 randomized formula groups or between the breastfed and formula groups. The adjusted means for the control, ARA+DHA, DHA, and breastfed groups were as follows: IQ scores, 104, 101, 100, 106; Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 99.2, 97.2, 95.1, 97.4; mean length of utterance, 3.64, 3.75, 3.93, 4.08; the visual-motor index, 2.26, 2.24, 2.05, 2.40; and visual acuity (cycles/degree), 30.4, 27.9, 27.5, 28.6, respectively. IQ was positively associated with female sex and maternal education and negatively associated with the number of siblings and exposure to cigarette smoking in utero and/or postnatally. Expressive language also was positively associated with maternal education and negatively associated with the average hours in child care per week and hospitalizations since birth but only when the breastfed group was included in the analysis. The associations between maternal education and child IQ scores are consistent with previous reports as are the associations between prenatal exposure to cigarette smoke and IQ and early language development. Approximately one third of the variance for IQ was explained by sex, maternal education, the number of siblings, and exposure to cigarette smoke. Growth achievement, red blood cell fatty acid levels, and morbidity did not differ among groups. CONCLUSIONS: We reported previously that infants who were fed an unsupplemented formula or one with DHA or with both DHA and ARA through 12 months or were breastfed showed no differences in mental and motor development, but those who were fed DHA without ARA had lower vocabulary scores on a standardized, parent-report instrument at 14 months of age when compared with infants who were fed the unsupplemented formula or who were breastfed. When the infants were reassessed at 39 months using age-appropriate tests of receptive and expressive language as well as IQ, visual-motor function and visual acuity, no differences among the formula groups or between the formula and breastfed groups were found. The 14-month observation thus may have been a transient effect of DHA (without ARA) supplementation on early vocabulary development or may have occurred by chance. The absence of differences in growth achievement adds to the evidence that DHA with or without ARA supports normal growth in full-term infants. In conclusion, adding both DHA and ARA when supplementing infant formulas with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids supports visual and cognitive development through 39 months.