Exploring the Potential and Limitations of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) in Generating Board-Style Dermatology Questions: A Qualitative Analysis.

This article investigates the limitations of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), a language model developed by OpenAI, as a study tool in dermatology. The study utilized ChatPDF, an application that integrates PDF files with ChatGPT, to generate American Board of Dermatology Applied Exam (ABD-AE)-style questions from continuing medical education articles from the Journal of the American Board of Dermatology. A qualitative analysis of the questions was conducted by two board-certified dermatologists, assessing accuracy, complexity, and clarity. Out of 40 questions generated, only 16 (40%) were deemed accurate and appropriate for ABD-AE study preparation. The remaining questions exhibited limitations, including low complexity, lack of clarity, and inaccuracies. The findings highlight the challenges faced by ChatGPT in understanding the domain-specific knowledge required in dermatology. Moreover, the model's inability to comprehend the context and generate high-quality distractor options, as well as the absence of image generation capabilities, further hinders its usefulness. The study emphasizes that while ChatGPT may aid in generating simple questions, it cannot replace the expertise of dermatologists and medical educators in developing high-quality, board-style questions that effectively evaluate candidates' knowledge and reasoning abilities.

Issues in transgender dermatology: A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Transgender patients have many unique dermatologic needs, yet the literature concerning dermatologic care of transgender individuals is lacking. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to provide a systematic review of the literature on dermatology care in transgender individuals to provide a foundation for future research and education. METHODS: We systematically reviewed peer-reviewed published studies that examined dermatologic treatment of transgender patients. RESULTS: A total of 110 articles met the inclusion criteria for systematic review. LIMITATIONS: Because of a lack of quantitative research in transgender dermatology, much of the available literature included in this review relies on case reports and expert opinions. CONCLUSION: Dermatologists have the ability to greatly affect the care of transgender patients, and there are ample opportunities for dermatologists to expand the literature pertaining to this population.

Long-term Likelihood of Patch Testing, Academic Practice, and American Contact Dermatitis Society Membership Among North American Alexander Fisher Award Winners From 1989 to 2012.

BACKGROUND: The Alexander Fisher Award (AFA) recognizes excellence in research among dermatology residents or medical students who make formal presentations at the annual American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS) meeting. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate long-term likelihood of patch testing, academic practice, and society membership among Alexander Fisher Award winners (AFAWs). METHODS: The AFAWs from 1989 to 2012 were identified with Internet searches to obtain their current practice location. Each practice was contacted by phone, and staff was asked whether the AFAW performed patch testing. Current ACDS membership was confirmed by ACDS leadership. Academic status was assessed by university association on practice Web sites. RESULTS: Sixty-two awards were presented to 60 individuals from 1989 to 2012. Fifty AFAWs are actively practicing dermatology in the United States (n = 43) and Canada (n = 7). Of 50 practicing AFAWs, 18 (36%) are active patch testers, 29 (58%) do not perform patch testing, and 3 (6%) could not be reached or staff declined to answer. Of the 50, 14 (28%) practice in an academic setting, and 10 (20%) are current ACDS members.