Cardio-Protective Effects of Multiport Antegrade Cold Blood Cardioplegia Versus Antegrade Cold Blood Cardioplegia in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Undergoing Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the in-hospital outcomes of multiport antegrade cold blood cardioplegia through vein grafts versus conventional antegrade cold blood cardioplegia in patients with left ventricle systolic dysfunction who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods This prospective, randomized clinical study was comprised of patients undergoing on-pump CABG at the Ch. Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology in Multan, Pakistan from November 18, 2018 to December 17, 2019. Patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction < 50%) were included. In Group A (N = 73), multiport antegrade cold blood vein graft cardioplegia was given after every distal anastomosis completed for myocardial preservation. In Group B (N = 73), conventional antegrade cold blood cardioplegia was given for myocardial preservation. Results Spontaneous rhythm (without defibrillation applied) after cross-clamp removal was higher in Group A than in Group B (93.3% vs. 85.2%, p < 0.05). Duration of support, ventilation time, and hospital stay were also significantly lower in Group A than in Group B with p = 0.00001, p = 0.03, and p = 0.002, respectively. Intra-aortic balloon pump insertion (4.1% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.02) and operative mortality (0.5% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.35) were also lower in Group A than in Group B. Postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased more in Group A than in Group B, and the postoperative LVEF mean value was 44.68% in Group A versus 41.26% in Group B (p = 0.02). Conclusion Multiport vein graft blood cardioplegia provides superior myocardial protection in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction who underwent CABG. It is also easy to administer, so this technique can be adopted as a routine method for myocardial protection in patients with left ventricular dysfunction planned for on-pump CABG.

Comparing the efficacy of Morphine alone with Morphine and mgso4 in pain management after coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of Morphine alone and Morphine with MgSo4 in pain management after CABG surgery. METHODS: This randomized control trial was conducted in the department of anesthesia and critical care Choudhary Pervaiz Ellahi Institute of Cardiology, Multan from November 2016 to June 2017. All collected data was entered and analyzed by using computer software SPSS version 23.1. Quantitative data like age, VAS score was analyzed and presented as mean and standard deviation. Similarly qualitative data like gender and ASA status was calculated and presented as frequency and percentages. Independent sample T-test was applied for significance of VAS score. P value ≤0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: A total number of 150 patients of both genders were included in this study. The main outcome variables of our study were VAS score. It was observed that, in group (M), the mean VAS score after 4, 12 and 24 hours of operation was 5.24±1.61, 5.8±2.27 and 5.44±2.27 respectively. And in group (MM), the mean VAS score after 4, 12 and 24 hours of operation was 4.36±2.58, 3.48±2.10 and 4.12±1.05 respectively. It was noted that both groups had statically significant difference of VAS score, as group (M) had higher VAS score than group (MM). CONCLUSION: Morphine with Mgso4 has better efficacy as compared to morphine alone when used as analgesic agent after CABG surgery.

Myocardial Protection with multiport antegrade cold blood cardioplegia and continuous controlled warm shot through vein grafts during proximal ends anastomosis in conventional coronary artery bypass graft.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits of simultaneous aortic root and vein graft cold blood cardioplegia and continuous controlled warm blood perfusion through vein grafts during proximal aortocoronary anastomosis in conventional coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease. METHODS: The prospective randomised study was conducted at Chaudary Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology, Multan, Pakistan, from April 2013 to June 2014, and comprised patients of isolated conventional coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The patients were randomised into 2 groups; Group I had patients in whom multiperfusion set was used for cardioplegia and continuous warm blood perfusion through vein grafts during proximal ends anastomosis, and Group II had patients in whom routine aortic root antegrade cardioplegia was used with no warm blood perfusion during proximal anastomosis of vein grafts. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: There were 434 patients in the study, with Group 1 having 215(49.5%) being the study group, and Group II having 219(50.5%)being the Control group. The groups showed no significant difference in the number of grafts, and aortic cross-clamp time (p>0.05 each). Total bypass time was significantly prolonged in the Control Group (p=0.001). Incidence of intra-operative arrhythmias, peri-operative myocardial infarction, need for inotropic support and intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation and operative mortality were significantly higher in the Control group (p<0.05 each). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous aortic root and vein graft cold blood cardioplegia and continuous controlled warm blood perfusion was beneficial for myocardial protection and early patient outcome.