An 11-Year Review of Keratoplasty in a Tertiary Referral Center in Turkey: Changing Surgical Techniques for Similar Indications.

OBJECTIVES: Study aims to evaluate the indications and surgical techniques for corneal transplantation and to report changes in trends for preferred keratoplasty surgical techniques. METHODS: Clinical records of 815 consecutive corneal transplantations between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2014 in Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital Eye Clinic were analyzed and classified into seven broad groups according to indications. Main outcome measures were change of leading indications and trends for surgical techniques. RESULTS: Leading indications for keratoplasty were keratoconus (KCN) (27.7%), bullous keratopathy (BK) (23%), postinfectious corneal scars (13.5%), regrafts (13.1%), corneal dystrophies (12.1%), and noninfectious corneal scars (5.4%). Regrafts were the only indication with a significantly increasing trend (P<0.01). Since the introduction of lamellar keratoplasty (LK) techniques including deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), there was a significant increasing trend in number and percentage of both LK techniques (DALK; P=0.001 and P=0.007, and DSAEK; P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) and a significant corresponding decline in the percentage of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (P<0.01). Similarly, DALK and DSAEK replaced PK as the preferred surgical technique for KCN and BK indications, (P=0.007 and P=0.01, respectively). Although PK was the most common surgical technique over the 11-year period (54.7%), both anterior and posterior LK techniques showed an emerging trend as the procedures of choice when indicated. CONCLUSIONS: No major shift was observed in the clinical indications for corneal transplantation over the previous 11 years, except for regrafts. Lamellar keratoplasty techniques largely overtook the PK technique, but PK was still the overall preferred technique in the era when both LK techniques were used.

Comparison of iris-fixated foldable lens and scleral-fixated foldable lens implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular support.

AIM: To compare the outcomes of vision using two different intraocular lens (IOL) replacement techniques, iris-fixated foldable intraocular lens (IF-IOL) and scleral-fixated foldable intraocular lens (SF-IOL) in patients with insufficient capsular support. METHODS: Total 63 eyes (62 patients) with insufficient posterior capsule support underwent replacement of IF-IOL or SF-IOL between January 2008 and August 2011. Outcome measures included changes in visual acuity, slit lamp examination, refractive indices and corneal curvatures. RESULTS: The mean improvement of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was greater in IF-IOL group compared to the SF-IOL group (0.43 D±0.19 D vs 0.35 D±0.18 D, P<0.05). Moreover, 12 (38.71%) eyes in IF-IOL group and 4 (12.50%) in SF-IOL group had a higher postoperative UCVA than preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) while 9 (29.03%) eyes in IF-IOL group and 18 (56.25%) in SF-IOL group had a lower postoperative UCVA than preoperative BCVA. The myopic mean manifest sphere and mean cylinder magnitude were lower in the IF-IOL group than that in the SF-IOL group (-0.47 D±0.58 D vs 0.50 D±0.43 D, P<0.01; 0.84 D±0.53 D vs 1.23 D±0.70 D, P<0.05). No difference of corneal astigmatism and surgically induced astigmatism was found between the two groups. In addition, fewer complications were observed in IF-IOL eyes. CONCLUSION: IF-IOL implantation can give a significant improvement in vision with fewer complications than SF-IOL in patients with insufficient capsular support.

Aspheric versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy: contralateral eye study.

PURPOSE: To compare the refractive, visual, and aberrometric outcomes between wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and aspheric PRK in myopic patients. SETTING: Khatam-al-Anbia Eye Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. METHODS: One eye of each patient was randomly assigned to excimer laser wavefront-guided PRK (Zyoptix) and the other eye to excimer laser aspheric PRK (Technolas 217z). The preoperative and 3-month and 6-month postoperative refractive errors, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Ninety-six eyes (48 patients) were enrolled. At the last postoperative visit, there were no between-group differences in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (P = .987) or corrected distance visual acuity (P = .416). The mean spherical equivalent was -0.076 diopter (D) ± 0.029 (SD) in the wavefront-guided group and -0.077 ± 0.075 D in the aspheric PRK group (P = .684). Postoperatively, the mean area under the log of contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) with and without glare testing improved over preoperative values (both P < .001). There was no statistically significant between-group difference in the AULCSF with glare (P = .903) or without glare (P = .978). Total HOAs increased after PRK in both groups, although aspheric PRK induced fewer HOAs than wavefront-guided PRK (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Both PRK methods equally improved postoperative UDVA and contrast sensitivity. The HOAs increased after treatment with both methods; however, aspheric ablation induced statistically fewer HOAs than wavefront-guided ablation. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis after laser thermal keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To report a case of corneal ectasia following hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis in a patient who had previous laser thermal keratoplasty. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: We report a case of a 66-year-old emmetropic man initially presented with complaint of difficulty reading without correction. Laser thermal keratoplasty (LTK) was performed on the non-dominant right eye, resulting in successful monovision. Three years later, the patient presented with decreased unaided near vision caused by hyperopic regression of the LTK. Conventional hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was performed, again resulting in successful monovision. More than three years later, the patient returned with worsening near vision. A focal corneal ectasia was noted in the same location as the 6 o'clock LTK leukoma. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report of ectasia occuring after LASIK following LTK. Consideration should be given to performing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) instead of LASIK following thermal keratoplasty.

Anterior ciliary sclerotomy for treatment of presbyopia: a prospective controlled study.

PURPOSE: To examine the safety and efficacy of anterior ciliary sclerotomy to restore accommodation in the presbyopic eye. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized comparative single-center clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Nine presbyopic subjects with no prior ocular surgery except corneal refractive procedures were enrolled. METHODS: One eye from each subject was chosen, in consultation with the patient, to undergo anterior ciliary sclerotomy. The contralateral eye of each subject served as a control. Examinations were performed preoperatively, and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Accommodative amplitude, measured by two methods, (2) Jaeger reading vision at 14 inches wearing best distance correction, (3) manifest refraction, (4) assessment of operative complications. RESULTS: For the nine study eyes, there was no statistically significant change between the average accommodative amplitude at the preoperative visit (1.11 diopter [D]) and the 1-month postoperative visit (1.19 D, P = 0.55) nor at the 6-month postoperative visit (1.31 D, P = 0.21) in the study eyes. There was no significant difference between the study and control eyes' change in accommodative amplitude at 6 months (P = 0.43). Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution equivalent of Jaeger reading vision in the study eyes at 14 inches wearing best distance correction showed no statistically significant change from the preoperative visit (0.53 [20/70]) at the 1-month postoperative visit (0.41 [20/50], P = 0.07) or at the 6-month postoperative visit (0.48 [20/60], P = 0.22). There was no significant change in manifest refraction spherical equivalent in the study eyes at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. One eye experienced a perforation of the anterior chamber during surgery. A second eye experienced mild postoperative anterior segment ischemia manifested by sectoral iris akinesis. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior ciliary sclerotomy does not restore accommodation in presbyopic eyes and can cause significant complications.

Steroid-induced glaucoma after laser in situ keratomileusis associated with interface fluid.

PURPOSE: To report the ocular manifestations and clinical course of eyes developing interface fluid after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery from a steroid-induced rise in intraocular pressure. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS/INTERVENTION: We examined six eyes of four patients who had diffuse lamellar keratitis develop after uneventful myopic LASIK surgery and were treated with topical corticosteroids. PRINCIPAL OUTCOME MEASURE: Slit-lamp findings, intraocular pressure measurements, and visual field loss. RESULTS: All eyes had a pocket of fluid develop in the lamellar interface between the flap and the stromal bed associated with a corticosteroid-induced rise in intraocular pressure. However, because of the interface fluid, intraocular pressure was normal or low by central corneal Goldmann applanation tonometry in all eyes. The elevated intraocular pressure was diagnosed by peripheral measurement in several cases after months of elevated pressure. All six eyes had visual field defects develop. Three eyes of two patients had severe glaucomatous optic neuropathy and decreased visual acuity develop as a result of undiagnosed steroid-induced elevated intraocular pressure. CONCLUSIONS: A steroid-induced rise in intraocular pressure after LASIK can cause transudation of aqueous fluid across the endothelium that collects in the flap interface. The interface fluid leads to inaccurately low central applanation tonometry measurements that obscure the diagnosis of steroid-induced glaucoma. Serious visual loss may result.