Stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of nonacoustic schwannomas.

OBJECTIVE: Nonacoustic schwannomas are rare tumors in contrast to the most common neuromas of Cranial Nerve VIII. The current treatment of choice in these cases is microsurgical resection, but the risk of postoperative complications is high, especially in cavernous sinus-invading tumors. In many of these cases, it is not possible to achieve complete tumor removal, resulting in the probability of recurrences. For those patients, radiosurgery (RS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) can offer an alternate treatment. METHODS: Within a 5-year period (2000-2005), 19 intracranial nonacoustic neuromas were treated with SRT-13 trigeminal neuromas, five neuromas of the lower cranial nerves (jugular foramen), and one located in the orbital region. Of these cases, there were nine women and 10 men who were, on average, 54 years of age (range, 33-83 yr). Eight patients had previously undergone surgery elsewhere and showed progressive tumor growth. All 19 patients were treated with SRT: 15 with normal fractions of 1.8-2 Gy single dose up to 54-59.4 Gy. Their irregular tumor volume ranged from 4.2 to 43.1 ccm (average: 14.1 ccm). Hypofractionation with 6 to 7 x 5 Gy was applied in four cases with an average tumor volume of 4.1 ccm (2.2-6.2 ccm). Clinical results and the efficacy for tumor control with an average follow-up of 35 months (11-63 mo) were evaluated. RESULTS: Local tumor control rate was 95% (18 of 19 cases): one patient previously operated on had a recurrence of tumor progression after SRT, followed by a second subtotal resection. A tumor regression was proved in 11 cases (one neuroma disappeared and four patients had tumor shrinkage of more than 50%, the other six experienced shrinkage between 20% and 40%). Within the first 6 months, two patients developed temporarily increased tumor volume as well as a confirmed reaction to irradiation. In one of these two cases, there were mild side effects according to CTC Grade I. No patient experienced a new or increased neurological deficit. Improvement of their cranial nerve disturbances was achieved in 11 of 19 patients and the other eight showed no clinical changes. The mostly moderate trigeminal pain decreased slowly. CONCLUSION: SRT is a low-risk and effective treatment option for intracranial neuromas. Particularly in cases of sinus cavernous-invading trigeminal and in jugular foramen tumors, SRT can be the treatment of choice. Concerning tumor regression, SRT is as effective as RS.

Special aspects of diagnostic imaging for radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations.

OBJECTIVE: Radiosurgery can be considered a well-established option for the treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The exact application of the therapeutic dose is based on the availability of imaging data sets with superior image quality that can be superimposed using an image fusion algorithm. For follow-up studies, the quantitative comparison of the respective image data sets also plays an important role. Until now, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has been a mandatory tool for treatment planning and follow-up procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a suitable computed tomographic (CT) and/or magnetic resonance (MR) angiography procedure can replace DSA and, if so, in which cases. METHODS: For 34 AVM patients, various MR data sets were used together with the stereotactically localized CT and DSA data sets for treatment planning. To define the AVM nidus precisely, all available MR data sets were fused onto the CT data set by the use of an automatic image fusion algorithm. The nidus was outlined in both localized DSA projections, resulting in the DSA target volume. Subsequently, the DSA target volume was adapted by inclusion of the available CT/MR data sets (localized and/or fused, slice by slice), resulting in the final target volume. Finally, both volumes were compared and analyzed. For precise comparison purposes, all available digital follow-up studies were fused. RESULTS: In all cases, the thin-slice MR data sets (1-mm slice width) that included T1-weighted series and time of flight angiographies have been precisely fused onto the stereotactically localized treatment planning CT. The final target volume was compared with the DSA target volume as follows. In 19 cases, the final target volume was larger than the DSA target volume; in six cases, it was smaller; and in five cases, it was approximately equal. The difference was significant (Wilcoxon test, difference <0.0001; t test, t = 3.01; P > 0.005). In four cases, outlining the AVM was not possible without DSA. In five patients, a two- or three-vessel DSA was needed because there were different AVM compartments. In cases in which a previous partial embolization had been undergone by the patient, the use of superimposed CT sets with and without contrast medium was important to define the completely embolized partial volumes that were not subject to treatment. The inclusion of the DSA images enabled a better identification of those arterialized veins that did not belong to the nidus. In six cases, the follow-up MR studies showed contrast enhancements overlapping the AVM nidus as a result of brain-blood barrier disturbances (T1-weighted series with contrast). In seven cases, perifocal reactions were primarily observed (T2-weighted series) 12 months after treatment with rather low clinical relevance. CONCLUSION: By integrating all available imaging modalities, the exact three-dimensional definition of the AVM nidus was safely realized for all patients. Stereotactic DSA data acquisition remains a crucial tool for safe nidus definition in radiosurgery treatment planning and cannot, therefore, be discarded at present. It is recommended that a quantitative comparison of all MR follow-up studies be established.

Stereotactic radiation treatment planning and follow-up studies involving fused multimodality imaging.

OBJECT: Innovative new software solutions may enable image fusion to produce the desired data superposition for precise target definition and follow-up studies in radiosurgery/stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with intracranial lesions. The aim is to integrate the anatomical and functional information completely into the radiation treatment planning and to achieve an exact comparison for follow-up examinations. Special conditions and advantages of BrainLAB's fully automatic image fusion system are evaluated and described for this purpose. METHODS: In 458 patients, the radiation treatment planning and some follow-up studies were performed using an automatic image fusion technique involving the use of different imaging modalities. Each fusion was visually checked and corrected as necessary. The computerized tomography (CT) scans for radiation treatment planning (slice thickness 1.25 mm), as well as stereotactic angiography for arteriovenous malformations, were acquired using head fixation with stereotactic arc or, in the case of stereotactic radiotherapy, with a relocatable stereotactic mask. Different magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences (T1, T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery images) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans were obtained without head fixation. Fusion results and the effects on radiation treatment planning and follow-up studies were analyzed. The precision level of the results of the automatic fusion depended primarily on the image quality, especially the slice thickness and the field homogeneity when using MR images, as well as on patient movement during data acquisition. Fully automated image fusion of different MR, CT, and PET studies was performed for each patient. Only in a few cases was it necessary to correct the fusion manually after visual evaluation. These corrections were minor and did not materially affect treatment planning. High-quality fusion of thin slices of a region of interest with a complete head data set could be performed easily. The target volume for radiation treatment planning could be accurately delineated using multimodal information provided by CT, MR, angiography, and PET studies. The fusion of follow-up image data sets yielded results that could be successfully compared and quantitatively evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the quality of the originally acquired image, automated image fusion can be a very valuable tool, allowing for fast (approximately 1-2 minute) and precise fusion of all relevant data sets. Fused multimodality imaging improves the target volume definition for radiation treatment planning. High-quality follow-up image data sets should be acquired for image fusion to provide exactly comparable slices and volumetric results that will contribute to quality contol.