Clinical features and outcome of patients with both ANCA and anti-GBM antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Patients have been described who have both anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCA) and anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibodies. We have attempted to define the true prevalence of such "double positive" patients, and describe in detail their clinical features and outcome. METHODS: We have reviewed all serologic assays performed between 1990 and 2000 in a single institution, and the case notes of patients having sera positive for both ANCA and anti-GBM antibodies. During this time 20,392 sera were initially tested for ANCA, and 4808 sera tested for anti-GBM antibodies. RESULTS: Five percent of all ANCA-positive serum samples were also positive for anti-GBM antibodies, and 32% of all anti-GBM positive samples had detectable ANCA. Of 27 patients with both antibodies, 82% had anti-myeloperoxidase specific P-ANCA. Pulmonary hemorrhage occurred in 44%. Renal biopsy showed extensive glomerular cellular crescents in most patients. Patient and renal survival rates were 52% and 26%, respectively, at one year. Sixty-eight percent of patients were dialysis-dependent at presentation, and none of these recovered renal function, despite immunosuppression with or without plasma exchange. CONCLUSION: Serologic evidence of double positivity for both ANCA and anti-GBM antibodies is common in patients with either antibody. In our study these patients have a poor prognosis when presenting with severe disease and initially behave more like anti-GBM disease than vasculitis. Recovery from severe renal failure is rare.

Urinary monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is a marker of active renal vasculitis.

BACKGROUND: Macrophage infiltration and cytokine production are important in the pathogenesis of crescentic glomerulonephritis in anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether urinary levels of chemokines, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and fractalkine, were useful tools for non-invasive assessment of renal vasculitis. METHODS: In a prospective study, concentrations of chemokines were measured in urine and serum samples using specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and related to the patients' clinical status. Renal expression of MCP-1 was studied by immunohistochemical staining of renal biopsies. RESULTS: Urinary levels of MCP-1 were significantly higher in patients with active (P<0.01) or persistent (P<0.05) renal vasculitis, in comparison with healthy volunteers, control patients, patients with inactive vasculitis and patients with extra-renal disease only. There were no differences in serum concentrations of MCP-1 between these groups. Reduction in urinary MCP-1 levels following treatment preceded the improvement of renal function by a median of 2 weeks. In one patient, rising urinary levels of MCP-1, despite immunosuppressive therapy, was associated with progression to severe renal failure. There were no differences in urinary fractalkine levels between the different groups of patients and controls. Immunohistology of renal biopsies from patients with crescentic glomerulonephritis showed increased staining for MCP-1 in glomerular and interstitial cells. Urinary MCP-1 levels correlated with glomerular, but not tubulointerstitial, macrophage infiltration (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that measurement of urinary MCP-1, but not fractalkine, is a useful non-invasive technique for the assessment of renal involvement and monitoring the response to therapy in ANCA-associated vasculitis.