Perioperative outcomes after transition from conventional to minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in a specialized center.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques are now increasingly adopted for the treatment of esophageal cancers. Benefits such as earlier functional recovery and less need for transfusion and intensive care stay should be balanced by a determination to avoid compromise to the oncologic integrity of the procedure, especially in the early phase of transition from open to laparoscopic surgery. This study aimed to compare primary outcomes including oncologic clearance, complications, and functional recovery between open and laparoscopic esophagectomy in a single center. METHODS: This prospective study recruited 75 consecutive patients undergoing Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, all treated by a single surgeon. These patients were divided into three groups. The 24 patients in group A underwent open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. The remaining patients underwent laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in two groups: 25 patients in an early cohort (group B) and 26 patients in a later cohort (group C). All the patients were treated according to the same protocol. RESULTS: The three groups were adequately matched. The findings showed trends toward a reduction in median operative time, with group A requiring 260 min, group B requiring 249 min, and group C requiring 223 min (p = 0.06), and a significant reduction in the requirement for perioperative blood transfusion between groups A (65%) and C (27%) (p = 0.02). The median lymph node yield was significantly less in group B (n = 13) than in group A (n = 24) or group C (n = 22) (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between the three groups in the length of hospital stay (median stay, 14-16 days) or the requirement for critical care beds (median stay, 3-4 days). The in-hospital mortality rate was zero, and the morbidity rate did not differ between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is associated with a reduced need for blood transfusion, a shorter operative time, and an adequate lymph node harvest. Oncologic principles are not compromised during the transition phase from open to laparoscopic esophagectomy.

Optimising laparoscopic cholangiography time using a simple cannulation technique.

BACKGROUND: Opponents of the routine use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) express concern over its technical difficulty and the length of time it takes. AIM: To evaluate the impact of our cystic duct cannulation (CDC) technique, as implemented by one consultant and his trainees, on the IOC time. METHODS: IOC is done routinely in all the laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) undertaken in our unit. We carried out a prospective audit over a period of 18 months, recording the IOC time in consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholangiography (LC) with and without laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). The total IOC time was considered to consist of two components: cystic duct cannulation (CDC) time and fluoroscopy time. The IOC time was further analysed according to the difficulty of cannulation and the operator experience. Special consideration was given to the LCBDE cases. We also describe the detailed steps of our CDC technique. RESULTS: Over a period of 18 months 243 patients underwent LC. IOC was completed in 240 patients (98.8% success rate). Of those, 194 were females (81%). The mean age was 50 years (range 18-85 years). The mean total IOC time was 6 min, with a CDC time of 2 min, and fluoroscopy time of 4 min. On further analysis, CDC was considered easy in 86% of cases with a mean CDC time of 1.5 min and total IOC time of 4.3 min. When cannulation was difficult (14% of cases) a cholangiography clamp had to be used to prevent leakage of contrast. In difficult cases, the CDC and IOC mean times were 5 and 8.5 min, respectively. As would be expected, trainees spent more time performing cannulation and completing the IOC than the specialist surgeon (3.8 versus 1.8 min, and 7.2 versus 5.6 min, respectively). These differences were statistically but not clinically significant. Similarly, the IOC time was also significantly increased in LCBDE (13 min). This was mainly due to an increase in fluoroscopy time (10 min) rather than CDC time (3 min). CONCLUSION: The IOC time could be optimised by using a simple and learnable cannulation technique to less than 5 min in most LCs. Surgeons should not, therefore, refrain from using this important investigation on selective or routine basis, subject to their policy for dealing with patients with suspected bile duct stones.