Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 22(11): 133, 2020 09 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32910342

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the global burden of hypertension continues to rise, it remains suboptimally controlled despite increased awareness. Poor medication adherence is a well-recognized although underestimated contributing factor of uncontrolled hypertension. This review focuses on medication non-adherence as an important cause of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension and its impact on patient's well-being. RECENT FINDINGS: In addition to biochemical screening, electronic technology-including electronic medication packaging devices such as medication event monitoring system, device integrated care delivery systems like digital medicine, and blood pressure telemonitoring-provides reliable objective data that enables healthcare providers to make decisions that enhance adherence and improve blood pressure control. Consistent medication adherence is a key factor to sustained blood pressure control. Evaluation and correct assessment for adherence should be an integral part of management of patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. Clinicians need to recognize key clues linked to suboptimal adherence or non-adherence that can result in poor outcomes.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Anti-Hipertensivos/farmacologia , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea , Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação
2.
Ren Fail ; 35(9): 1264-8, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23924372

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Some nephrologists remove tunneled hemodialysis catheters (TDC) at the bedside, but this practice has never been formally studied. Our hypothesis was that bedside removal of TDC is a safe and effective procedure affording prompt removal, including in cases of suspected infection. METHODS: We reviewed our consecutive 3-year experience (2007-2009) with bedside TDC removal at the University of Mississippi Renal Fellowship Program. Data were collected on multiple patients and procedure-related variables, success and complication rates. Association between clinical characteristics and biomarkers of inflammation and myocardial damage was examined using correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Of 55 inpatient TDC removals (90.9% from internal jugular location), 50 (90.9%) were completed without hands-on assistance from faculty. Indications at the time of removal included bacteremia, fever or clinical sepsis with hemodynamic instability or respiratory failure. All procedures were successful, with no cuff retention noted; one patient experienced prolonged bleeding which was controlled with local pressure. Peak C-reactive protein (available in 63.6% of cohort) was 12.9 ± 8.4 mg/dL (reference range: <0.49) and median troponin-I (34% available) was 0.534 ng/mL (IQR 0.03-0.9) (reference range: <0.034) and they did not correlate with each other. Abnormal troponin-I was associated with proven bacteremia (p < 0.05) but not with systolic and diastolic BP or clinical sepsis. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that bedside removal of TDC remains a safe and effective procedure regardless of site or indications. Accordingly, TDC removal should be an integral part of competent Nephrology training.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal/instrumentação , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrologia/educação , Nefrologia/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...