Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Diagn Res ; 8(5): ZC33-6, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24995241

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare frictional resistance which was produced between conventional brackets (0.022 slot Otho-Organiser) and self ligating brackets (active Forestadent and passive Damon III) by using various arch wire combinations (0.016 Niti, 0.018 Niti, 0.017 x 0.025 SS and 0.019 x 0.025 SS). METHODS: An experimental model which consisted of 5 aligned stainless steel 0.022-in brackets was used to assess frictional forces which were produced by SLBs (self ligating brackets) and CELs (conventional elastomeric ligatures) with use of 0.016 nickel titanium, 0.018 nickel titanium, 0.017 X 0.025"stainless steel and 0.019 X 0.025"stainless steel wires. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One way ANOVA test was used to study the effect of the bracket type, wire alloy and section on frictional resistance test . RESULTS: Conventional brackets produced highest levels of friction for all bracket/archwire combinations. Both Damon III and Forestadent brackets were found to produce significantly lower levels of friction when they were compared with elastomerically tied conventional brackets. CONCLUSION: SLBs are valid alternatives for low friction during sliding mechanics.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...