Diagnostic Accuracy of Color Doppler and Calcium Scoring versus Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography in the Assessment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of Lower Limb.

OBJECTIVES: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) leads to narrowing and hardening of arteries which leads to increased risk of lower extremity amputation. Hence, the accuracy of non-invasive diagnostic methods such as calcium scoring and color Doppler needs to be assessed in comparison to the gold standard dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) angiography. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of color Doppler and calcium scoring when compared to DECT angiography in the assessment of PAD of the lower limb. It is a cross- sectional retrospective study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 55 patients aged between 40 and 70 years. All the patients with symptoms suggestive of PAD underwent color Doppler study of lower limb arterial system. Afterward, the patient underwent CT angiography. The first plain images were taken for calcium scoring following which contrast was given and further images were taken. RESULTS: As compared to CT angiography assessment, Doppler assessment was 88.1% sensitive but only 69.2% specific with diagnostic accuracy of 83.6%. For angiographically detected atheromatous changes, color Doppler had sensitivity and specificity of 86.2% and 76.9%. The derived cutoff value >149.1 of calcium score in lower limb arteries was in 100% agreement with CT angiography detected PAD, whereas, for atheromatous changes, total calcium score at a cutoff value of >842.2 had sensitivity and specificity of 75.9% and 80.8%. CONCLUSION: Calcium scoring as compared to color Doppler has a higher diagnostic efficacy for the detection of DECT angiography confirmed PAD, whereas calcium score lacks adequate sensitivity at projected cutoff in the evaluation of atheromatous changes.

Characterization of Breast Lesions Using a Novel Combined Approach of Ultrasonography and Elastography Prior to Invasive Procedures: Are New Age Modalities Set to Replace the Diagnostic Giant?

Objective The goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of B-mode ultrasound and ultrasound elastography used alone and in combination for differentiating breast lesions into benign and malignant. Materials and methods Eighty-five patients were investigated with B-mode ultrasonography and elastography and provided a Breast Imaging Reporting, and Data System (BI-RADS) score based on ultrasonography, strain ratio, and elastography score (ES) based on elastography. Each lesion was then evaluated by a combination method, combining BI-RADS with strain ratio and BI-RADS with elastography score. Each modality was assessed for the successful detection and characterization of the lesion and whether combining ultrasonography B-mode imaging with strain elastography improves diagnosis and is reliable enough to replace invasive procedures such as biopsy that have been the mainstay of diagnosis. Results Of 85 lesions, 23 lesions (27%) were found to be malignant, and 62 lesions (72.9%) were benign. When used alone, BI-RADS had 100.0% sensitivity, 13% specificity, 50% and 100% positive and negative predictive values (respectively), and 72.9% accuracy. BI-RADS results were then combined with strain ratio (SR) and ES. BI-RADS with SR had 91.3% sensitivity, 95.2% specificity, 87.5% and 96.7% positive and negative predictive values (respectively), and 94.1% accuracy. Similarly, BI-RADS with ES had 91.3% sensitivity, 93.5% specificity, 84.0% and 96.7% positive and negative predictive values, and 92.9% accuracy. Conclusions The combination method performs better at diagnosing breast lesions than BI-RADS alone and can be used as an early and preliminary basis for diagnosis and in settings where invasive procedures cannot be performed. Combining strain elastography and BI-RADS also help characterize which lesions are better suited for biopsy, leading to a decline in unnecessary invasive procedures.