The Relationship between Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography and Visual Field Test Results in Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspect Patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationships between parameters of transcranial ultrasonography and results of visual field tests in patients with open angle glaucoma or suspected of having glaucoma. METHODS: This retrospective study was based on data from medical records of patients who visited the Department of Ophthalmology in Kangbuk Samsung Hospital from January 1, 2016, to October 17, 2019, and underwent transcranial Doppler ultrasonography as part of a routine health examination. Ophthalmic data were visual acuity, intraocular pressure, optical coherence tomography, and Humphrey visual field test results. Retinal nerve fiber layer defect was confirmed by a glaucoma specialist. Patients' ophthalmic data, such as average ganglion cell layer thickness, visual field index, pattern standard deviation, and mean deviation, were divided into quartiles. Each ophthalmic artery parameter from transcranial Doppler ultrasonography was compared between quartiles. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were reviewed. There was no difference in Doppler ophthalmic artery (OA) parameters between patients with or without retinal nerve fiber layer defect. None of the quartile groups of average ganglion cell layer thickness showed significant difference in any OA parameters. Patients in the low-visual field index quartile showed significant low peak systolic velocities of OAs when adjusted for age, sex, and presence of diabetes mellitus or hypertension (p = 0.016). A higher pattern standard deviation showed lower peak systolic velocity (p = 0.046). There was no significant tendency between any other OA parameter and mean deviation value. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that hemodynamic parameters of ophthalmic arteries might be associated with visual field status of patients. Further large-population studies are needed in order to better understand the relationship between visual function and ocular blood flow.

Clinical outcomes of bilateral implantation of new generation monofocal IOL enhanced for intermediate distance and conventional monofocal IOL in a Korean population.

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical outcomes of bilateral implantation of enhanced intermediate function intraocular lenses (IOLs) and standard monofocal IOLs. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, comparative controlled study, we compared the visual outcomes of patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery at the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, with either enhanced monofocal IOLs (Tecnis Eyhance, ICB00, Johnson and Johnson Vision Care, Inc) (Group 1) or standard monofocal IOLs (Tecnis, ZCB00, Johnson and Johnson Vision Care, Inc) (Group 2). The assessment included monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate (UIVA at 60 cm) and near (UNVA at 40 cm) visual acuity, uncorrected defocus curves, contrast sensitivity testing (CST), and reading speed test using Quality of vision was evaluated using the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). RESULTS: At 3-months postoperatively, monocular and binocular outcomes of UIVA and UNVA were statistically significantly better in Group 1 (P < 0.05). The binocular uncorrected defocus curve of Group 1 showed statistically significantly better outcomes at vergence ranges of -1.5 to -4.0 D (P < 0.05). Significantly higher reading speed test was also observed in Group 1 in all ranges tested (1.0 to 0.1 LogMAR) (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in CST between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral implantation of enhanced monofocal IOLs provided better vision at intermediate and near distances compared to standard monofocal IOLs, while maintaining good distance vision and contrast sensitivity.

Comparison of Longitudinal Changes in Refractive Error of Hyperopic Children with or without Refractive Accommodative Esotropia.

We investigated longitudinal changes in the spherical equivalent refractive error (SE) in hyperopic children with or without refractive accommodative esotropia (AccET). A total of 456 patients met the inclusion criteria: 190 (41.7%) in the hyperopic control group and 266 (58.3%) in the AccET group. All patients received at least 3 years of follow-up after spectacle prescription. Subgroups were divided according to age when spectacles were prescribed, presence of amblyopia, or initial SE. Longitudinal changes in SE in children with hyperopia showed a gradual decrease, although SE of younger children with AccET increased over the first 4 years and then decreased thereafter. SE in eye with higher SE was tended to decrease significantly in patient with Acc ET than hyperopic control group (group × time p = 0.015). Amblyopic eyes showed a greater decreased in SE compared with non-amblyopic eyes, but it was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). SE was significantly decreased in children with more hyperopia (≥ 3 D) compared with children with less hyperopia (<3 D) (p = 0.008). Emmetropization of hyperopia was faster in hyperopic patients without AccET and could be affected by the age of the initial spectacles prescription, initial amount of SE, or presence of amblyopia.