Korean radiographers' awareness, experiences, and education needs in forensic medicine and forensic radiology.

This study assesses the need for education in forensic medicine and forensic radiology among radiographers by investigating the perceptions and experiences of Korean radiographers working in medical institutions. A structured questionnaire was administered to participants, collected, and analyzed. The results showed that despite receiving frequent forensic cases, Korean radiographers face difficulties in taking appropriate measures about forensic radiology due to a lack of awareness and knowledge of its forensic aspects. The participants indicated that university education in forensic medicine and forensic radiology is necessary. Therefore, it is imperative to develop and implement policies for forensic education programs to enhance radiographers' forensic knowledge and capabilities. Universities should conduct courses on forensic radiology and provide continuing education for radiographers working in this field.

Development and evaluation of a forensic nursing competency-based hybrid simulation education program: A quasi-experimental design.

AIM: This study aimed to develop and validate the effectiveness of a hybrid simulation education program designed to enhance the forensic nursing competency of emergency department nurses. BACKGROUND: Emergency nurses often bear the responsibility of conducting forensic nursing assessments and interventions, such as patient recognition and evidence collection, to safeguard patients' legal rights, given their frequent encounters with emergency department patients. Simulation methods have proven effective in training for forensic nursing care. However, there is still a need for the development of forensic nursing education using simulation methods. DESIGN: This study employed a one-group pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental design. A four-hour simulation education program was developed based on the analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation model, with a focus on enhancing forensic nursing competency. METHODS: Nurses with more than six months of clinical experience in the emergency department in South Korea were divided into an experimental group (n=23) and a baseline comparison group (n=24). Both groups completed self-evaluations of their forensic nursing competency through a survey. The experimental group underwent the simulation education program, and their forensic nursing performance was evaluated before and after the program. Following the training, participants completed a questionnaire to assess their forensic nursing competency and satisfaction with the program. RESULTS: The initial forensic nursing competency of the experimental and baseline comparison groups was found to be similar. However, the forensic nursing competency and performance of the experimental group exhibited significant improvement after the training. Regarding program evaluation, the average scores on a 5-point scale were as follows: theoretical lecture (4.79 SD 0.27), simulation education (4.78 SD 0.29), simulation design (4.42 SD 0.45), and satisfaction with the educational program (4.82 SD 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: The forensic nursing competency-based simulation education program herein improved the relevant competency and performance of emergency nurses.

Differences between Scores Assessed by Examiners and Examinees on Objective Structured Clinical Examination.

PURPOSE: Self-assessment is important for learning. But, the reliability of self-assessment has long been questioned. We investigated this problem in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) setting. METHODS: Forty third-year nursing students who participated in the OSCE were given the same checklist that was used for assessment by the examiners after they finished the OSCE. Then, the scores that were calculated by the examiners and examinees were compared, measuring the average, correlation, difference in score between examinee and examiner, difference in score according to the examinee's level, and Z-score. RESULTS: Scores that were made by the examinees were significantly higher than those of the examiners (average 72.34 vs. 64.03), between which there was a loose positive correlation (r=0.34). The correlation coefficient increased (r=0.62) when a difference in score (examinee-examiner) was compared with the examiner score. When examinees were divided into 3 groups according to their scores, the difference tended to become less as the scores of examinee rose. When the Z-score was compared with the level of the examinee, examinees who had higher scores evaluated themselves lower than the examiners, and examinees with lower scores assessed themselves higher than the examiners. CONCLUSION: According to comparison of averages or correlation analysis, self-assessment by the examinee appeared to be less reliable. But when data were analyzed using difference in score, examinee levels, and Z-score, a certain tendency developed. This pattern may be due to the heterogeneity of the examinee group. Selection of appropriate analysis methods might be important to estabilish the reliability of self-assessment skills.