Novel endoscopic tangential sawing technique in treatment of giant gastric bezoars: a retrospective single-center study (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The current methods for treatment of giant gastric bezoars mainly include chemical dissolution, endoscopic fragmentation, and surgical removal, which often have limited curative effects or generate multiple adverse events. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find new methods to overcome such a dilemma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of a novel guidewire-based tangential sawing fragmentation (GTSF) technique to treat giant gastric bezoars. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study was performed in the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital. Ten patients with giant bezoars were consecutively enrolled from December 8, 2019 to April 8, 2021. We treated the 10 patients with the GTSF technique, recorded the GTSF procedure, and followed the patients with gastroscopy 2 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: All patients were successfully treated by the GTSF technique, and the giant bezoar was broken into small pieces (<2 cm in diameter). The average operation time was 21.73 minutes, and the average fragmentation time was 8.06 minutes. Ten patients treated with the GTSF technique attained satisfactory treatment results, with no acute adverse events or alimentary canal injury during the procedure, and no bezoar residue remained as shown by gastroscopy 2 weeks after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The GTSF technique is a safe, effective, and feasible method for removing giant bezoars and can be considered as an alternative treatment of this disease.

PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: An update based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The efficacy of PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy (high-dose dual therapy) in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori is controversial. We aimed to investigate whether PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy is effective. METHODS: We searched several publication databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy with controls up to March 2019. Meta-analyses of eradication rates were performed using random-effects models. RESULTS: Data from twelve RCTs including 2249 patients suggested that PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy and the current mainstream guidelines-recommended therapies achieved similar efficacy (83.2% vs 85.3%, risk ratio [RR]: 1.00, 95% CI 0.97-1.03, intention-to-treat analysis), (87.5% vs 90.1%, RR: 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.02, per-protocol analysis), and compliance (94.3% vs 93.5%, RR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.78-1.59), but side effects were less likely in the dual therapy (12.9% vs 28.0%, RR: 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.76). Further subgroup analyses showed that the seven RCTs (1302 patients) that reported antimicrobial susceptibility test results also showed that PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy and the current guidelines-recommended therapies achieved similar efficacy, and PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy was as effective for rescue therapy (RR: 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.05) as for first-line treatment (RR: 0.97, 95% CI 0.93-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the current mainstream guidelines-recommended therapies, PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy has the same efficacy and compliance, and generally PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy causes fewer side effects.

High dose dual therapy versus bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) versus bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) for Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: Comparing HDDT to BQT were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases in Chinese up to March 2018. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 to compare the efficacy and side effects of these 2 therapies for H pylori infection. Dichotomous data were pooled to score the relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Four randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including 829 patients with a diagnosis of H pylori infection were assessed. Overall the meta-analysis showed that both HDDT and BQT achieved similar efficacy of intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rate, 85.5% versus 87.2%, RR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.96-1.06), P = .63, and of per-protocol (PP) eradication rate, 88.4% versus 91.5%, RR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.96-1.04), P = .99, and adherence 97.8% versus 95.0%, RR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.99-1.04), P = .32, but side effects were more likely in BQT (14.4% vs 40.4%, RR 0.42 (95% CI: 0.32-0.54), P <.00001). CONCLUSION: Both HDDT and BQT can achieve similar eradication rate for H pylori infection and adherence, and generally HDDT causes fewer side effects.

Efficacy and safety of high-dose dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori rescue therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Although some studies have reported >90% success with high-dose dual proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication, the efficacy of this therapy remains controversial. We aimed to re-evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose dual therapy on H. pylori eradication. METHODS: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of high-dose PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy as the rescue therapy on H. pylori eradication. Treatment effect was determined with a fixed-effect model using the inverse variance method and was expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Because of significant statistical heterogeneity (χ2  15.98, I2  = 69%) among the six studies that qualified, four RCTs that included 473 patients with H. pylori infection after eradication failure were assessed. The meta-analysis showed that high-dose dual therapy and guideline-recommended rescue therapies achieved similar efficacy (81.3% vs 81.5%, RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.93-1.08], intention-to-treat analysis), compliance (95.3% vs 95.4%, RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.97-1.03]), and side effects (17.9% vs 19.7%, RR 0.88 [95% CI 0.62-1.25]). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy is comparable to recommended rescue therapies for H. pylori infection. More researches are needed to determine the efficacy of high-dose dual therapy as a first-line therapy.