Repair integrity and functional outcomes of arthroscopic repair for intratendinous partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic repair of intratendinous partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of intratendinous partial-thickness rotator cuff tears from January 2010 to January 2015 in a single institute. Five outcome measures were used: a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the shoulder rating scale of the University of California at Los Angeles, the Constant-Murley score, and range of motion (ROM). Pain was recorded using the VAS. Active ROM was measured goniometrically. Rotator cuff repair integrity was determined via magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography at least 6 months after arthroscopic repair. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients, 29 (96.6%) returned for functional follow-up evaluation no earlier than 2 years after the operation. All functional scores exhibited significant improvements (all p = 0.000). The VAS improved from a mean of 5.8 ± 1.6 to 2.5 ± 2.6 ( p = 0.000). The mean active ROM of forward flexion changed from 149.8 ± 33.8° preoperatively to 172.4 ± 9.1° ( p = 0.001) at the last follow-up; abduction changed from 115.6 ± 50.3° to 171.3 ± 15.9° ( p = 0.000). Postoperative radiological evaluation revealed retearing in three patients (3/28, 10.7%), including two with articular-side partial-thickness retears and one with a bursal-side partial-thickness retear. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic repair of intratendinous partial-thickness rotator cuff tears was associated with a retearing rate of 10.7% on radiological follow-up and afforded significant clinical and functional improvements.

Do patients receiving workers' compensation who undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have worse outcomes than non-recipients? Retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: We compared preoperative and postoperative measures among workers' compensation board (WCB) recipients and non-recipients and determined the impact of WCB receipt on the 1- and 2-year outcomes of rotator cuff repair. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic repair between September 2011 and September 2014. Patients were divided into two groups based on WCB status: WCB recipients and non-recipients. All patients returned for follow-up functional evaluations at 1 and 2 years after the operation. Four outcome measures were evaluated: visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), and range of motion (ROM). RESULTS: Seventy patients (38 males, 32 females) were evaluated, 20 of whom were WCB recipients. At 1 year after the operation, ASES, UCLA, and VAS scores as well as abduction ROM (Abd-ROM) had improved significantly in both groups. However, non-recipients showed significantly greater improvement than did WCB recipients in ASES, UCLA, and VAS scores and in forward flexion ROM and Abd-ROM ( p = 0.000, 0.009, 0.002, 0.046, and 0.020, respectively). However, at 2 years after the operation (after the end of WCB), there were no significant differences in any clinical outcome between WCB recipients and non-recipients ( p = 0.057, 0.106, 0.075, 0.724, and 0.787, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although workers' compensation recipients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair had worse outcomes while receiving WCB benefits, the outcomes were similar after WCB benefits ended.

Clinical outcomes and repair integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using suture-bridge technique with or without medial tying: prospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: There have been few studies comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between the conventional and knotless suture-bridge techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes and repair integrity of arthroscopic conventional and knotless suture-bridge technique for full-thickness rotator cuff tears. METHODS: We prospectively followed 100 consecutive patients (100 shoulders) with full-thickness rotator cuff tears treated with the arthroscopic conventional or knotless suture-bridge technique from October 2012 to July 2014. Enrolled patients returned for follow-up functional evaluations at 1 and 2 years after the operation. There were four outcome measures in this study: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) scores, Constant scores, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores. Enrolled patients returned for follow-up magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography evaluation to confirm the integrity of the repaired cuff at 6 months post-operation (97% follow-up rate). Also, we investigated the preoperative cuff retraction of enrolled patients using preoperative MRI to find out correlation between the stage of cuff retraction and re-tear rate. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the average UCLA, ASES, Constant, and VAS scores had improved significantly to 32.5, 88.0, 80.4, and 1.3, respectively, in the conventional suture-bridge technique group and to 33.0, 89.7, 81.2, and 1.2, respectively, in the knotless suture-bridge technique group. The UCLA, ASES, Constant, and VAS scores improved in both groups after surgery (all p < 0.001), and there were no significant differences between the two groups at 2-year follow-up (p = 0.292, 0.359, 0.709, and 0.636, respectively). The re-tear rate of repaired rotator cuffs was 16.3% (8/49 shoulders) in the conventional suture-bridge technique group and 29.2% (14/48 shoulders) in the knotless suture-bridge technique group; this difference was not significant (p = 0.131). There were no significant differences between the re-tear rate of the two groups in the Patte stage I and II (p = 0.358 and 0.616). CONCLUSIONS: The knotless suture-bridge technique showed comparable functional outcomes to those of conventional suture-bridge techniques in medium-to-large, full-thickness rotator cuff tears at short-term follow-up. The knotless suture-bridge technique had a higher re-tear rate compared with conventional suture-bridge technique, although the difference was not significant.

Incomplete articular-side repair increase re-tear rate in full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

PURPOSE: This study compared the functional outcome and repair integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair according to articular-side repair state in full-thickness tears. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 80 consecutive patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears of 1.5-3.5 cm at the anterior to posterior dimension. These patients were divided into two groups according to intraoperative articular-side repair state during operation: complete and incomplete repair groups. Repair integrity was evaluated at 6 months after the operation by magnetic resonance image or ultrasonography. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. Four outcome measures were used in this study: visual analog scale pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and range of motion. RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, the average UCLA, ASES, and constant score improved significantly to 32.46, 87.94, and 79.69, respectively, in the complete group and to 32.50, 87.65, and 78.92, respectively, in the incomplete group. The UCLA, ASES, and constant score improved in both groups postoperatively (all ps < 0.000); however, there was no significant difference between the two groups ( p = 0.960, 0.921, and 0.796, respectively). The re-tear rate was 13.7% in the shoulders that underwent complete repair and 33.3% in the shoulders that underwent incomplete repair; this difference was statistically significant ( p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Regardless of the repair state of articular-side rotator cuff, the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair resulted in comparable functional outcomes between two groups at short-term follow-up. However, patients who repaired articular-side rotator cuff incompletely revealed higher re-tear rate after operation than those who repaired completely.

Anteroposterior translation of the glenohumeral joint in various pathologies: differences between shoulder MRI in the adducted neutral rotation and abducted externally rotated positions.

PURPOSE: The present study was performed to determine the translation of the glenohumeral joint in patients with and without shoulder lesions by comparing the magnetic resonance images obtained in the conventional adducted neutral rotation position with those obtained in the abducted externally rotated position. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty-five consecutive shoulders without rotator cuff tears that had been subjected to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without arthrography in the abducted externally rotated position were reviewed retrospectively. Among them, 50 shoulders without pathology were selected at random to be compared with three shoulder pathology groups, comprising shoulders with superior labrum, anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) lesions without range of motion (ROM) limitation (group I, 47 shoulders), with massive rotator cuff tears without ROM limitation (group II, 20 shoulders), and with full-thickness subscapularis tendon tears without ROM limitation (group III, 20 shoulders). Glenohumeral translation in the anterior-to-posterior direction relative to the glenoid face was evaluated using a method based on the glenohumeral contact point (CP) and humeral head centre (HHC) in the adducted neutral rotation and abducted externally rotated views, which were measured by three orthopaedic surgeons. For each shoulder, the differences in translation for the glenohumeral CP and HHC between the adducted neutral rotation and abducted externally rotated views were calculated as relative posterior translation in millimetres. RESULTS: The differences in ΔCP and ΔHHC between group I and the normal control group were not statistically significant. The differences in ΔCP (P = 0.001) and ΔHHC (P = 0.001) between group II and the normal control group were statistically significant. Additionally, the differences in ΔCP and ΔHHC between group III and the normal control group were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The MRI in abducted externally rotated view in patients with SLAP lesions or full-thickness subscapularis tendon tears diagnosed by conventional MRI alone showed no significant glenohumeral posterior translation relative to the adducted neutral rotation view in the present study. However, the abducted externally rotated view in patients with massive rotator cuff tears showed significant glenohumeral anterior translation relative to the adducted neutral rotation view.

Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: double-row versus suture-bridge technique.

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have examined repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic suture-bridge rotator cuff repair procedure. In addition, no reported study has compared outcomes between the suture-bridge and double-row techniques. PURPOSE: This study compared the functional outcome and repair integrity of arthroscopic double-row and conventional suture-bridge repair in full-thickness rotator cuff tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive full-thickness rotator cuff tears with 1 to 4 cm of anterior to posterior dimension that underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were included. A double-row technique was used in the first 26 consecutive shoulders, and a conventional suture-bridge technique was used in the next 26 consecutive shoulders. Fifty shoulders (92.5%) underwent magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated a minimum 2 years (mean, 37.2 months; range, 24-54) postoperatively using the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Constant scores. The postoperative cuff integrity was evaluated a mean of 33.0 (range, 10-54) months postoperatively. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the average UCLA, ASES, and Constant scores improved significantly, to 32.3, 90.5, and 80.7, respectively, in the double-row group and to 30.6, 88.5, and 74.0, respectively, in the suture-bridge group. The UCLA, ASES, and Constant scores improved in both groups postoperatively (all P < .001); however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups at final follow-up (P = .185, .585, and .053, respectively). The retear rate was 24% in the shoulders that underwent double-row repair and 20% in the shoulders that underwent suture-bridge repair; this difference was not statistically significant (P = .733). CONCLUSION: The arthroscopic conventional suture-bridge technique resulted in comparable patient satisfaction, functional outcome, and rates of retear compared with the arthroscopic double-row technique in full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Percutaneous reduction and leverage fixation using K-wires in paediatric angulated radial neck fractures.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the usefulness of percutaneous reduction and leverage fixation using K-wires in children with radial neck fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2008, we evaluated 13 paediatric patients with radial neck fractures who had been observed for at least two years and underwent percutaneous reduction and leverage fixation using K-wires. We measured radial angulation and radial translation using preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up radiographs, and we clinically investigated range of motion and carrying angle according to Steele's grading system. RESULTS: Excellent clinical results were achieved in 11 (84.6%) patients, good results in one (7.6%) and fair results in one (7.6%). There were no poor results. The patient in whom fair results were achieved also had an olecranon fracture, which was treated conservatively. Complications such as nonunion, infection, iatrogenic nerve injury and periarticular ossification were minimal. Radioulnar synostosis was absent between the radial neck fracture and the greenstick fracture of the olecranon. Growth arrest in the proximal radial epiphysis was also absent. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous reduction and leverage fixation using K-wires in children with radial neck fractures is a recommended surgical treatment that can achieve recovery of normal radial angulation and elbow motion.